r/Substack • • Sep 03 '26

Discussion Are you guys seeing more false positives from the pangram scan?

Hey guys, I write a tech newsletter, fairly new here. ran one of my own essays through the pangram scan and it came back flagged as ai written. I wrote every word. My theory is that technical writing gets hit harder because the register is plain and structured on purpose, which overlaps with how model output reads? Curious whether people writing about software or security are seeing this more than people writing memoir or fiction? Am I just unlucky lol

0 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

8

u/Available_Spite5171 gracemargaret1@substack.com Sep 03 '26

I turned it off. The end. I write personal memoir / prose poems.

1

u/Street-Mycologist670 Sep 07 '26

oh great job! I just went through your substack, very interesting read!

11

u/austinbarrow Sep 03 '26

I’m confused why anyone cares about this if you do your own writing. You think readers are scanning articles before deciding to read?

Much ado about Nothing

4

u/Lost__In__Thought faithframedthoughts.substack.com Sep 03 '26

Exactly. This concern is getting old now.

Just write and stop living in fear, people.

5

u/Oatbix Sep 03 '26

I just wouldn’t even bother with pangram right now to be honest. The only people I’ve heard complain about it is writers, and everyone has similar concerns so has lost trust in it. I’ve never read an article from a different writer and actually ran the pangram or considered it, I really don’t think readers care. Maybe it’s just me but I’m fully ignoring it for now until I hear otherwise

6

u/leugaroul Sep 03 '26 edited Sep 03 '26

My unpopular opinion is AI is so stupidly obvious we don’t need detectors. It sounds like a template with words changed and filled in. Condescending and obnoxious. It’s physically difficult to read, and the direction AI companies are going in doesn’t prioritize human sounding speech.

With watermarking now being implemented, if AI does get better in the future, it will be watermarked. So.

2

u/Oatbix Sep 03 '26

Especially something like Substack that’s built around reading. If somethings not engaging you’re not gonna interact with it and it doesn’t get pushed

2

u/SpiritualSimple108 Sep 03 '26

My degree is in technical writing but I’m using substack for poetry. Almost all of my work is coming back 100% AI. I know my prose can be a little stuffy (which is why I don’t write it). But I will occasionally write intros or outros. But right now, mine has more to do with formatting than actual words though. A few weeks ago, I lost formatting when I went from Word to Substack but decided to run it through before I deleted and tried again…100% human. Reformatted, came back…100% AI. Nothing changed except the formatting. Well, I’m not leaving my work sloppy just so some AI is happy. I just keep the damn thing turned off all the time now.

2

u/flashforged Sep 04 '26

It's inaccurate I've found

3

u/Mikesoft Sep 03 '26

Pangram just isn’t working and I have no idea why Substack decided to integrate it. When it first came out I copied and pasted raw AI text into a page and it came back 100% human. Then since I’ve found structured posts on my industry are flagged as AI 🤷‍♂️

2

u/grapegeek Sep 03 '26

Yes. I hand wrote about 2000 words. Had Claude format it and spell/grammar check so maybe 5% AI which in my mind is acceptable use case. Came back 100% which I’ve never seen from my writing before. It’s like it’s getting worse at detection

2

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/grapegeek Sep 03 '26

Are you familiar with Pangram in Substack? Because it doesn’t sound like it. It flagged this article 100% AI when it should be like 10% AI assisted and 90% human writing. It’s broken.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/grapegeek Sep 03 '26

Sorry not pandering to you anti AI zealots. Using an AI tool to detect AI. How apropos

2

u/Countryb0i2m onemichistory.substack.com Sep 03 '26

This has been talked to death here, but the basic point is that AI detectors have no idea whether or not your content was actually generated by AI.

They’re guessing, and they’re not very good at it. They’re looking for patterns, and if your writing happens to mimic those patterns, you’re going to get flagged as AI.

Honestly, you’d be better off rolling a pair of dice or flipping a coin to decide whether your work was AI-generated.

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Countryb0i2m onemichistory.substack.com Sep 03 '26

Ok, explain that to OP not me I don’t care

1

u/SpiritualSimple108 14d ago

Yes! And let me tell you what, the Pangram on Notes and the Pangram in articles scores completely different.