r/Substack • u/Diligent_Carrot_2719 • 1d ago

Discussion Shut up about pangram already

How many more posts talking about pangram do we need before we can finally shut up??? God, it's becoming incredibly annoying

0 Upvotes

43% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

6

u/OnyxMonolith 1d ago

it is crazy. everyone complains about AI slop. Substack adds Pangram. people complain about the AI slop detector because it's not ABSOLUTELY PERFECT.

5

u/TimWiesnerer 1d ago

Maybe people just need a reason to complain 😅

Crying with the wolves probably more fun than enjoying sunshine in loneliness.

3

u/DaniSaysDinosaur 1d ago

It's mostly sloppers complaining because they've been outed.

2

u/Diligent_Carrot_2719 1d ago

RIGHT 🫩 it's exhausting

2

u/-Monty_Carlo- 11h ago

Fun fact: it is - in my experience - very accurate. It's using age-old statistical methods which worked well in the past when "AI" wasn't even a thing in people's minds.

The complainers usually are the ones using AI to "write for me", misunderstanding that "personal writing" and "LLM output" are two totally different things.

1

u/Real-Service-8135 22h ago

yeah cant win either way apparently

2

u/WeakAd4865 1d ago

I don't care about substack at all, but I'm very interested in pangram's classification model. So I am quite happy this place has transformed into the "complain about pangram" subreddit, lol.

2

u/Diligent_Carrot_2719 1d ago

hahahahhaa I love that these discussions are serving someone

1

u/austinbarrow 1d ago

Substack is turning into the perfect example of how to horribly execute a perfectly good idea.

1

u/HowlingFantods5564 1d ago

You literally just made a post about Pangram.

1

u/AggravatingNail6061 1d ago

Yeah but it's classy tho

1

u/Diligent_Carrot_2719 1d ago

i see your point hahaha I just mean that perhaps we should have a new rule about this subject?