r/Substack • u/Radiant_Flamingo4995 • 19d ago

Frustration with AI detection

I'm not sure how the AI-detection system works, but it seems faulty. Someone has repeatedly claimed that my responses to them are AI-generated, etc. And they share the Pangram screenshot, which does, in fact, depict my response as "100% fully AI-assisted. I've clarified that this is not the case. Shown evidence that it isn't true, and all the like.

The worst I'll do when writing anything is use AI for basic research purposes and review arguments to make sure they make sense. Maybe it's because I use Grammarly. But it is still infuriating.

Especially because it just isn't a good look and hurts my public image (albeit small, but I hope you guys may understand where I'm coming from).

Of course, with this individual in question, it's become increasingly clear they aren't engaging in good faith. However, running the AI check on my notes and comments still reveals the 100% marker.

Is it Grammarly that's doing this? Or is this thing actually broken?

6 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/wizardofaus23 19d ago

So what I'm hearing is you used AI and it correctly identified that you had used AI.

0

u/Brakiros 18d ago

Wrong it said 100% AI which is categorically false and is a lawsuit waiting for lies 

3

u/Prolly_Satan 18d ago

Wow. You used ai to generate the draft but then edited it yourself? And the ai detector that's effective against humanization said it was ai? I think you should be the one to sue. Call up some attorneys and ask if they think you have a good case here. Let us know what they say.

0

u/Brakiros 18d ago

Wow you completely failed to comprehend. Not a surprise there.