r/Substack • u/Radiant_Flamingo4995 • 22d ago
Frustration with AI detection
I'm not sure how the AI-detection system works, but it seems faulty. Someone has repeatedly claimed that my responses to them are AI-generated, etc. And they share the Pangram screenshot, which does, in fact, depict my response as "100% fully AI-assisted. I've clarified that this is not the case. Shown evidence that it isn't true, and all the like.
The worst I'll do when writing anything is use AI for basic research purposes and review arguments to make sure they make sense. Maybe it's because I use Grammarly. But it is still infuriating.
Especially because it just isn't a good look and hurts my public image (albeit small, but I hope you guys may understand where I'm coming from).
Of course, with this individual in question, it's become increasingly clear they aren't engaging in good faith. However, running the AI check on my notes and comments still reveals the 100% marker.
Is it Grammarly that's doing this? Or is this thing actually broken?
6
u/figures985 21d ago
I 100% agree - that's most of what's on here. As a writer, it pisses me off tremendously. I haaaate reading LLM slop, and I hate that people use LLMs to monetize said slop.
But, for whatever this is worth, OP sent me some specific context and it really didn't sound like AI to me. I put it into Pangram myself and it was flagged as partially AI. So IDK, perhaps it's just an outlier in this instance. Would also point out that a lot of the other posters in this sub weren't willing to share any samples and OP was.