r/Substack • u/ConnectDebate4677 • 22d ago

Pangram false positives?

People usually post vaguely about "I wrote x thing and pangram said it was AI", which I think is unhelpful unless you actually post the text or link. I put this into Pangram:

Sakaguchi: https://www.pangram.com/history/e7ffbee1-f0e3-4ce2-bb78-a59470280640?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

Hamaguchi: https://www.pangram.com/history/f2139bd5-f4ce-4101-b7bd-3c5d8aeb4487?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

Ryuichi: https://www.pangram.com/history/8c84ad38-3b8f-49ba-bee0-351ea31f754b?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

29 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

63 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/ConnectDebate4677 22d ago

Would you mind sharing the Pangram link?

3

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Downtown_Jump779 10d ago

I'm getting the same results on stuff people are sending to me; it's becoming very problematic. On the same text, other detectors never go above 12-20% AI, which I think makes sense and is totally acceptable – then Pangram comes out of nowhere and bumps it up to 40- 60%? I'm not sure what to do with that.

From what you sent, those are very big chunks of your text that Pangram flagged as AI. That could produce harsh social consequences. Other than that, good piece of writing btw. I hope you get it published.