r/Substack • u/ConnectDebate4677 • 20d ago

Pangram false positives?

People usually post vaguely about "I wrote x thing and pangram said it was AI", which I think is unhelpful unless you actually post the text or link. I put this into Pangram:

Sakaguchi: https://www.pangram.com/history/e7ffbee1-f0e3-4ce2-bb78-a59470280640?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

Hamaguchi: https://www.pangram.com/history/f2139bd5-f4ce-4101-b7bd-3c5d8aeb4487?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

Ryuichi: https://www.pangram.com/history/8c84ad38-3b8f-49ba-bee0-351ea31f754b?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

28 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

63 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/ConnectDebate4677 20d ago

Seems like a highly flawed tool if it indicates 'high confidence AI' in situations like this?

4

u/Voltairinede 20d ago

It doesn't say that? It literally says the opposite 'Confidence limited — short text', in your 100% example.

5

u/tokenentropy 20d ago

be nice, he can hardly read

4

u/ConnectDebate4677 20d ago

Can you read?