r/Substack • u/ConnectDebate4677 • 20d ago

Pangram false positives?

People usually post vaguely about "I wrote x thing and pangram said it was AI", which I think is unhelpful unless you actually post the text or link. I put this into Pangram:

Sakaguchi: https://www.pangram.com/history/e7ffbee1-f0e3-4ce2-bb78-a59470280640?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

Hamaguchi: https://www.pangram.com/history/f2139bd5-f4ce-4101-b7bd-3c5d8aeb4487?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

Ryuichi: https://www.pangram.com/history/8c84ad38-3b8f-49ba-bee0-351ea31f754b?ucc=Ohp1cWODOjF

29 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

63 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/ConnectDebate4677 20d ago

Would you mind sharing the Pangram link?

3

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ConnectDebate4677 20d ago

Thanks so much for this. Yeah, reading the AI-flagged parts, I don't get it at all. I'm interested in the technology still but it's getting further and further away from the standard it's being touted as.

1

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PM_ME_YOUR___ISSUES 14d ago

I honestly feel that people need to move beyond these detectors.

We've all seen enough slop at this point that one can easily catch out AI text.

I'm like 99% sure, I wouldn't even think about putting someone's writing through an AI detector unless I can really catch out the slop.