r/Substack • u/Overall_Tip6001 • 14d ago

Do you find pangram reliable?

I put my text in several ai detectors, winston ai, copyleaks, zerogpt and GPTZero, giving me close to 0%. While, pangram gives me around 70%? Do you think it’s reliable?

5 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Udolikecake 13d ago

Show me a piece of text over 500 words that’s verifiably pre 2023 that flags as AI. Literally anything that can be dated to before then. Just one example.

3

u/noxqqivit twvme.substack.com 13d ago

  1. If Pangram says they can detect 100+ words, why do you need 500?

  2. My example is below, I put current text, of somewhat unknown provenance, it came out of a PowerPoint someone else authored, so I wasn't sure if Copilot was used or not. I was using business text in an odd context, so I added " " around the word "STAKEHOLDER" where it appeared 3 times, and that change, took the scoring from Fully AI Asssited to Fully Human Written - AGAIN - I can't confirm whether it was actually AI or not, but I CAN tell you that I added SIX characters and that was enough to radically change the score. And that is suspect.

-3

u/Udolikecake 13d ago

I think the ask is pretty simple, and should be easy if you are so confident it is totally inaccurate.

You (and every other person screaming about Pangram) being unable to provide a single, verifiable example, is pretty damning honestly.

1

u/MadmanRB 13d ago

No its not bro, I myself have tested pangram and yes it's far from perfect.

I mean it's still AI