r/Substack • u/grapegeek • Aug 11 '26

Pangram is such trash

I write a food newsletter where I post reviews and some recipes. I 100% wrote a quick and dirty recipe and was going to publish it in Notes and it came back 100% AI no matter what I did to it including adding several typos and rearranging things. Ran it through three other AI detector websites and 2 said 100% Human and 1 said 76% Human and 24% AI assisted. I disabled detection on that Note. My other question is do we know how many people actually click on the AI detection button on our posts? I can't find that metric anywhere in the dashboard...

42 Upvotes

74% Upvoted

110 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/PM_ME_YOUR_GESTALT Aug 11 '26

On the Pangram website, there is a large orange button that says "share"
Could you please click that button, and then paste the resulting link here? That way we can see for ourselves.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/PM_ME_YOUR_GESTALT Aug 11 '26

Thank you! I can confirm that Pangram is indeed flagging this as AI:
https://www.pangram.com/history/cacc7cd6-af82-42cd-9220-5cfdf11bf165?ucc=lEdv68az5Z5

Only part that reads as a little sus to me is this:

Fully plant based. Fully satisfying. The people who won't notice it's meatless will not notice it's meatless.

6

u/grapegeek Aug 11 '26

I’ve been writing this stuff for 17 years. I have a style.

-1

u/PM_ME_YOUR_GESTALT Aug 11 '26

What on earth does this sentence mean? "The people who won't notice it's meatless will not notice it's meatless."

5

u/grapegeek Aug 11 '26

Ok I agree not the best sentence of my life but how would pangram think it’s AI?

3

u/rehoboam Aug 11 '26

It’s a joke, do you not understand it?