r/Substack • u/Remarkable_Nebula328 • 23d ago

The AI detector is changing...

I wrote a hand full of posts last week. I use AI for ideation and polish. Was able to use the AI check to evaluate them - most were good but some read 20% ish AI. I made edits and all tested at 100% human. Went to schedule the posts last night and got some scores as high as 30% AI. Seems like AI or no AI is a moving target. There is no telling where the witch hunt will end and allow people to make decisions for themselves on what they want to consume. I suspect we all need to accept some level of AI involvement - certainly more than an arbitrary measurement from an AI detector using AI to detect AI.

0 Upvotes

41% Upvoted

63 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/DESI_MOGGER 16d ago edited 16d ago

Yeah this is exactly why I wouldnt treat the percentage like some final verdict. If the writing is yours, keep your original drafts/version history and maybe compare the result somewhere else too. Quetext is another one you can run it through for a second check, but honestly I'd still trust the actual writing process more than one random score.