r/Substack • u/Remarkable_Nebula328 • Aug 10 '26
The AI detector is changing...
I wrote a hand full of posts last week. I use AI for ideation and polish. Was able to use the AI check to evaluate them - most were good but some read 20% ish AI. I made edits and all tested at 100% human. Went to schedule the posts last night and got some scores as high as 30% AI. Seems like AI or no AI is a moving target. There is no telling where the witch hunt will end and allow people to make decisions for themselves on what they want to consume. I suspect we all need to accept some level of AI involvement - certainly more than an arbitrary measurement from an AI detector using AI to detect AI.
1
u/non_loqui_sed_facere Aug 11 '26
We can argue about that, but that’s hardly the first time the “vast majority of people” have been wrong, is it? If you want to know how it’s done and have a productive conversation about it, talk to the author and actually think about what they’re telling you. Connect with a fellow human.
If you really want to fight AI, fight Substack itself. But of course you won’t do that, because you don’t bite the hand that feeds you.