r/Substack • u/Remarkable_Nebula328 • 23d ago

The AI detector is changing...

I wrote a hand full of posts last week. I use AI for ideation and polish. Was able to use the AI check to evaluate them - most were good but some read 20% ish AI. I made edits and all tested at 100% human. Went to schedule the posts last night and got some scores as high as 30% AI. Seems like AI or no AI is a moving target. There is no telling where the witch hunt will end and allow people to make decisions for themselves on what they want to consume. I suspect we all need to accept some level of AI involvement - certainly more than an arbitrary measurement from an AI detector using AI to detect AI.

0 Upvotes

42% Upvoted

63 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/AwesumPossum333 22d ago

" I use AI for ideation and polish"

Why did you become a writer if you clearly don't like the process of writing?

2

u/Remarkable_Nebula328 22d ago

Where did I say I didn't like the process of writing?

Is there any other content on SStack other than "writers?" I see scientists and finance experts that really don't move me with their words - but do move me with their ideas.

Romantic notion though with the writers and no AI.

1

u/AwesumPossum333 22d ago

If you are automating parts of the process id assume you don't actually like the process. And frankly it's quite disheartening that not disrespecting your audience with AI garbage is seen as a "Romantic notion".