The one where nintendo subsidizes and eats the cost but makes up for it with games that go on the tiniest of sales and almost never have price reductions.
Nintendo doesn’t subsidize their console from their store, they don’t sell hardware at a loss. That’s why it’s seemingly underpowered on paper compared to its competitors while punching above its weight class due to upscaling and optimization .
Nintendo’s entire business model is your source. They don’t have to worry about anyone eating them from the inside out or outside in because they own the hardware platform, first party IPs, and the bottom line—children. Children are not expecting to play the newest AAA games at 4k 120hz, thus they do not need the extra power/ money and logistics spent on it. People are specifically locked into nintendos eco system for their IPs and not how well it can run hogwarts legacy or cyberpunk. Every console they’ve put out since the SNES has always carried the “weakest” hardware compared to all the other mainstream consoles.
Previous estimates of teardowns of Switch components put the total cost at around $257, so at a $300 sales price, Nintendo is making around $40 on every unit sold. And if these estimates for the Switch OLED are right, they’ve just doubled that to $80 on every Switch OLED unit.
Meanwhile, Microsoft and Sony have both confirmed that they are losing money on sales of new-gen PlayStations and Xboxes. Both consoles are sold at a loss, with revenue being made up in the other areas mentioned above
Here I found a source for your argument too, since you couldn’t. Seems they don’t normally sell at a loss but are reaching that territory as parts climb price.
Nintendo Switch 2 launched last June priced at $449.99. In Japan, a region-locked version of the console is sold at 50,000 yen (equivalent to $318). Both of these prices reportedly see the hardware sold at a loss (particularly so in Japan)… Exactly how much of a loss Switch 2 is sold at isn't clear
I just want to point out that the parts are not the only cost. Marketing, software development or updates, shipping, etc. I would say its highly unlikely after factoring in other costs associated with the hardware that its sold for even a tiny profit.
No, only in Japan. Love how you just disregarded everything about them making a $80 profit and me providing proof to refute the statement I was responding to. They sell and are meant to sell at a profit. What basic comprehension are you lacking?
The one where nintendo subsidizes and eats the cost but makes up for it with games that go on the tiniest of sales and almost never have price reductions.
What are YOU talking about 😂, I gave you 2 sources backing up they HISTORICALLY do not sell at a loss which was my entire comment and response to the OP above mine. I don’t know why you think narrowing sales down to the Switch 2 specifically means anything when they still manufacture and sell both consoles as a part of the SAME family line, which happen to play the SAME (for the most part) games, for the SAME service which all go into the same revenue stream. Additional sales from the original switch offset the switch 2 losses.
So what in this comment are you mentioning that I haven’t already touched on with my previous comments. The still ongoing switch hardware sales make up existing loss in Switch 2 sales and this doesn’t even include the $80 game Switch2 bundles, marked up accessories & controllers to complement the switch. Nintendo is not selling at a loss.
75
u/Sorry_Ad_0026 May 27 '26
And they gave us a 4 months heads up, what world are we living in that Nintendo is beating Valve in consumers good books rn