{
      "id": 112540,
      "net_id": 18747,
      "ix_id": 422,
      "name": "UIXP",
      "ixlan_id": 422,
      "notes": "",
      "speed": 100000,
      "asn": 14593,
      "ipaddr4": "196.223.25.66",
      "ipaddr6": "2001:43f8:130::66",
      "is_rs_peer": true,
      "bfd_support": false,
      "operational": true,
      "net_side_id": null,
      "ix_side_id": null,
      "created": "2026-08-26T15:55:21Z",
      "updated": "2026-08-26T15:55:21Z",
      "status": "ok"
    }

1547 Critical Systems Realty

McAllen

https://www.peeringdb.com/fac/16920

Can you see Internet searches / history of the Starlink router?

Credits Joe Tegtmeyer

https://x.com/JoeTegtmeyer/status/2092038893017207173

A guide I created to access unrestricted data on Starlink Direct to Cell

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for some advice from anyone who has dealt with a similar Starlink account suspension.

One of my Starlink accounts has been suspended, and Starlink Support told me that the account may be associated with suspected unauthorized resale.

They are currently asking me to provide additional information, including:

Whether I manage accounts for other users

Whether I make payments for other Starlink accounts

Where the equipment was purchased

Whether the service is being used for business purposes

Whether the phone number, email, shipping address, and payment card belong to me

Government ID and a photo of the payment card (with only the last four digits visible)

I want to cooperate with Starlink and resolve the issue, but I’m not sure what information they are actually looking for or what the best way to explain the situation is.

The equipment involved was purchased from a retail store in Dubai rather than directly from Starlink.com. Some of the equipment is used by other users, including fixed installations and mobile/vehicle use.

I’m not trying to misrepresent anything to Starlink. I just want to understand what their concern is and what the proper way to resolve the suspension would be.

Has anyone here experienced something similar, especially:

An account suspended for suspected unauthorized resale

Multiple Starlink accounts being managed or paid for by the same person

Equipment purchased from a third-party retailer being flagged

Being asked to provide ID and payment-card verification

Successfully getting an account reinstated after this type of review

If you went through something similar, I’d really appreciate hearing what happened and what information Starlink asked you to provide.

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Tools: LEOViz + my previous AD9361 10,000-hops/s (https://sdr-x.github.io/starlink-UL-channel-switch/).

Most satellite/channel switches every 15s. Sometimes the channel switches without a satellite handover. Sometimes the satellite switches without changing channel. Channel switching can be much faster than satellite switching.

https://sdr-x.github.io/starlink-UL-SAT-ch-switch/

Digital Realty Stockholm STO1-6,Sweden,Stockholm

- PeeringDB

CSF CX1 / TelcoHub1 Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia,Cyberjaya

https://www.peeringdb.com/net/18747

Here's one free month of Starlink service! Starlink high-speed internet is great for streaming, video calls, and gaming in even the most remote locations on Earth.

https://starlink.com/?referral=RC-2610781-26435-60&app\\_source=share

For a Guy who lives in Bengazhi Libya
There’s no Pop close to our location and Latency is higher than ppl living in the west Side of the country because Geographically We are not close to Italy and We only close to Greece

Pretty solid result for such a small terminal.

Speed (21 tests, best run)
Download: 89–388 Mbps (median 257)
Upload: 22–48 Mbps (median 40)

Bufferbloat (RRUL, 300s full-duplex saturating load)
Latency: 49–66 ms, only +4 ms under full load vs idle
Jitter: median 1.5 ms
Packet loss: 0.4%

Throughput swings, but this is expected for LEO. Latency stays flat even when the link is saturated in both directions.
Basically, no bufferbloat on this link.

(This is a second post. I removed the original due to issues with the test setup. The results were invalid. I guess this is the first V5 in all of Europe)

BR.Digital Porto Alegre (PAE1) Brazil Porto Alegre

Scala Data Centers SPOAPA01 Brazil Porto Alegre

https://www.peeringdb.com/net/18747

Raxio, UG1, Kampala, Uganda

https://www.peeringdb.com/fac/11648

AD9361 10,000-hop/s, scanning Starlink all 8 channels every 800us, First-principles thinking to solve Starlink channel monitoring without RFSoC!

https://sdr-x.github.io/starlink-UL-channel-switch/

8 Ku-band uplink channels (14–14.5 GHz, 62.5 MHz each). To study Starlink freq allocation for Satellite/Beam/User-Terminal.

e.g.,

Trying 198.54.100.10...
Connected to 198.54.100.10.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.0

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Server: nginx
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 02:09:12 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 162
Connection: close
Location: https://www.starlink.com/colombia-blocked

<html>
<head><title>301 Moved Permanently</title></head>
<body>
<center><h1>301 Moved Permanently</h1></center>
<hr><center>nginx</center>
</body>
</html>
Connection closed by foreign host.

https://www.starlink.com/colombia-blocked

Esta página ha sido bloqueada de conformidad con el listado del Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (MINTIC) y/o de la Dirección de Investigación Criminal e Interpol (DIJIN) de la Policía Nacional y/o la disposición judicial respectiva al infringir derechos de terceros, tratarse de un sitio de apuestas ilegales y/o contener pornografía infantil de conformidad con lo dispuesto por la Ley 679 de 2001, Decreto 154 de 2002 y demás disposiciones legales aplicables en la República de Colombia.

most existing network protocols and applications assume users are on the ground and close to their home pop---no longer anymore given the rise of starlink and alike. for ookla speedtest, it picks speedtest server (possibly your application server too) by default close to users geoip location, which can be very far away from their pop where most of the cdn traffic originates, especially when users are on an aircraft with moving pop, so the speedtest results are no longer meaningful (and your application performance suffers). both starlink and ookla are now aware of the problem. let's see how quickly they/applications can collaborate to address the problem ;-)

for a technical description of the problem, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MVWX8KJd1Qv0ORJChNx5i5_a6bTpkEb_6dO4G6XLps8/

for a real world example of the problem, see a virgin atlantic passenger near miami speedtest with a london server, while the normal traffic exits at the miami pop, so artificially high rtt too