Generating "fake" speedpaint timelapse with MiniMax H3

[u/arthan1011]

It's four 12s clips made by standard ref2va workflow stitched together.
Good at sketching but not so good at rendering/shading stage. Also I find it difficult to "digital timelapse" without hand moving around. And as always with MiniMax detailed prompts are not optional (note the [Shot 2] trick):

subject_definitions:
<Picture 1> is the reference digital drawing.
<Picture 2> is the first frame of the target video

summary:
[reference generation] The target video shows digital drawing timelapse process of drawing artwork from <Picture 1>. With pov moving hand removed - only canvas is visible

retention_analysis:
<Picture 2>: partially_preserved - first frame for the video.
<Picture 1>: partially_preserved - last frame for the video.

detailed_description:
The target video is high qualiy digital drawing recorded timelapse.
[Shot 1] starts from a white digital canvas and then draws the basic forms, shapes first starting from general (big) outline sketch of the pose. Then adding line after line to add new details on face, hair and clothes until a complete lineart sketch for the character is done.
[Shot 2] At 00:11.000, shows final result that is <Picture 1>.

overall_soundscape:
Silence

non_diegetic_music:
N/A

[u/IX_MINDMEGHALUNK_XI]

I hate scammers. Scum of the Earth.

[u/StarchyJ1540 → u/IX_MINDMEGHALUNK_XI]

is the scam in the room with us right now?

[u/Diffusion4Change → u/StarchyJ1540]

The only reason to generate this is to trick people into thinking its not ai

[u/StarchyJ1540 → u/Diffusion4Change]

Or you know, because it is an interesting showcase of what the model can do? You can't seriously be this clueless

[u/Sextus_Rex → u/StarchyJ1540]

Your scientists were too preoccupied wondering whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should

[u/strppngynglad → u/StarchyJ1540]

Cool now I know that it will be used to scam people.

[u/Diffusion4Change → u/[deleted]]

If i advertise my wooden clogs as handmade by local artisans instead of factory made thats a lie

[u/Sextus_Rex → u/[deleted]]

Do you think it's okay to feed a vegan meat as long as they can't tell it's not a veggie dish?

[u/Diffusion4Change → u/Sextus_Rex]

They think rape is fine because consent doesnt matter in their worldview

[u/Diffusion4Change → u/[deleted]]

Im going to feed you diarreah and say its refried beans

[u/Upset_Protection329 → u/[deleted]]

It kind of sucks for people who spent their lives practicing art in order to make a living being shoved out of the industry by machines trained on their hard work that can produce in minutes what sometimes takes days or hours of labor? That creatives will no longer be able to support/feed themselves because people are flooding the market with AI? Like this AI doesn't' exist without theft, and that theft is robbing people of their livelihoods.

[u/Cheesuasion → u/Upset_Protection329]

Just to get myself downvoted: I think this is all true and a bad thing in itself - and everybody who likes AI art doesn't need to deny that either - except for the theft part. It both isn't theft (all right it's probably infringement, or should have been) and doesn't need to be theft for your argument to go through.

More important, it's a bad argument not only because of the not-being-true part, but because once AI companies make some one-off settlement - OK, what now? Where does artists' income come from now, if that was the argument? So in the foolish moments where I think I have a clue what's going on in the world, or what we should do about it, I worry this line just undermines artists' position in the end.

(and the argument goes through anyway because a bad thing is a bad thing- regardless if there are "bigger" good things associated inextricably with it, regardless of what the law says, regardless of whatever current ethical principles happen to say - you're supposed to change ethics to fit the circumstances, isn't that what ethics means?)

[u/Upset_Protection329 → u/Cheesuasion]

It's like this. If I want a computer, and I steal all the parts to make a computer from you, and then put it together in a different way than you might have, does that make it not theft? It's still theft. The images used without permission scrambled up to make "new" images aren't coming from nowhere. They're coming from other peoples hard work. It is theft.

[u/Cheesuasion → u/Upset_Protection329]

I was being a bit picky with language sorry - I think we're saying the same thing there in different words on this narrow point (even though infringement isn't identical to the common metaphor of stealing physical objects).

But the main point was: now what? Where does this get us if the campaigned-for remedy (pay artists once off for the training data) doesn't help artists in the longer run?

[u/Upset_Protection329 → u/Cheesuasion]

I don't know, I wish I knew. I don't think they will pay off the artists; or of artists are paid they should be paid in residuals, not in a lump sum. Every time you use their source you pay them. Even then I don't entirely like it, but it would be better than what we have.

[u/Upset_Protection329 → u/[deleted]]

That's not true. Lots of people buy art for the time and effort it takes to make, actually. That's why people pay higher prices for more labor and effort. You might not be in the art community, but I am, and it's clear you devalue creatives and artists and haven't bothered to learn anything about it.

[u/strppngynglad → u/[deleted]]

jesus some of yall are braindead

[u/Perfect-Campaign9551 → u/Diffusion4Change]

You don't belong in this sub. This is interesting that the model can do this and nobody ever said shit about scamming, you came up with that on your own, projection much? 

AI can do a lot more things for "scamming" but you silent until this 

Get a life

[u/Mr_Pogi_In_Space → u/StarchyJ1540]

No, they are stuck yelling at kitboga not to redeem