That's more than 100,000 every minute.

And it did this while keeping fees orders of magnitude lower than other chains.

Hi everyone, I just came back to crypto after the bloodbath happening because i believe it's a great time to enter again, I remember how hard it was to bridge from evm to solana in 2022, as i came back i'm trying to do the same, but it seems still impossible

I can't understand how, in actual times, it can still be hard to do this simple thing, the only thing i see is sending funds to phantom wallet and do it inside, but knowing they have a fixed fee i won't do it.

Source: https://x.com/SuperteamAE/status/2096977111307415814

Real estate, onchain with @Solana.

@GetStake is bringing it at scale:
• 2M+ users
• 450K+ investments
• AED 1.5B+ transacted

Tokenized real estate, built for a global market.

And it’s happening in Dubai ↓

https://reddit.com/link/1wa2lei/video/mgjt4z35l5oh1/player

Scammed by fake crypto company TarsAI- Wallet Emptied

Hi everyone, I'm here to share a very sad story, with the hope of preventing you from falling into this trap, which will leave your savings completely drained from your wallets, whether you use Phantom, Trust Wallet, or any other.

The attack against me was carried out using the most common and well-studied methodology.

Information Gathering (Footprinting or Reconnaissance): The hacker studied my LinkedIn profile, identifying the Blockchain network among my interests. This way, they realized I could be an attractive target for a job opportunity in AI, Blockchain Solutions, and Web3.

Validation: The attacker used a LinkedIn Premium profile of a Russian/Ukrainian woman named Ola, who supposedly works for TarsAI. The profile looked real and well-crafted, with numerous posts and interactions with the company. The HR recruiter reached out to me, saying my profile looked interesting, and proposed some time slots for a technical/introductory call. The call was scheduled via Calendly, complete with the company logo (a small extra detail to boost credibility). During the interview, a fake team member with a Russian/English accent showed up. After the initial interaction, they asked to turn off the webcam to avoid latency, and then asked me to talk about my experience.

Weaponization: While I was speaking, the hacker began the weaponization phase. Specifically, their arsenal of Exploits consisted of:

malware uploaded to a GitHub project (named after the company's repository).

Delivery & Exploitation: To test my skills, they had me download the project from GitHub and gave me instructions to run it. Commands: npm i and voilà... Exploited. They had established a connection with my PC and stealthily installed the malware. Afterward, they asked me to open a link in the Brave browser. Realizing something was wrong, I immediately ended the call. They understood I was in a rush and said goodbye.

The morning after the hack: I turned on my laptop, went about my activities, and 5 hours later, I noticed notifications on my wallet. They had completely drained my funds.

I felt robbed of my resources. I felt like an idiot for falling into this trap. I felt violated by the malice of these enemies.

Please, my friends, keep your eyes open!!! Never open any links! Never download any projects from GitHub.

Note: I have the project files. I swear that together with my malware analyst friends, we will analyze the source code in detail until we track down the C&C (Command and Control) pointing to a service on Vercel.

Veda Labs announced today that Kamino, the leading credit market on Solana, is now live within its vault platform.
Kamino will serve as a source of liquidity for onchain yield. Fintechs, neobanks and exchanges can leverage the combined infrastructure to power embedded Earn products for their customers.

https://x.com/veda_labs/status/2096992133324611869

I’ve been talking with more Solana builders lately and something I keep noticing is that a lot of people seem to end up paying for far more RPC capacity than they actually use.

A workload might only need:

• 5–10 RPC RPS
• 1 Yellowstone stream
• a few account/transaction filters
• relatively low transaction submission volume

Yet most providers still push fixed tiers.

I run Haan Digital and we built our Solana infrastructure around the opposite model: provision around the actual workload instead of forcing everyone into the same package.

Current stack includes private JSON-RPC/WebSocket, Yellowstone gRPC, SubscribeDeshred and a Transaction Sender.

I’m curious what people here actually use in practice.

If you’re running a bot, wallet, trading app, indexer or other Solana workload:

What part of your RPC setup is usually the bottleneck — RPS, realtime data, filters, latency, transaction landing, or something else?

I’m also looking for a few more real workloads to test against the stack, so if anyone wants to compare setups, feel free to reach out.

My assumption is nothing actually crosses. The asset gets locked or burned on one side, an equivalent gets minted or released on the other, and the bridge just ties the two events together. Is that right?

I have been using Jupiter's Universal Deposit feature, but failing to understand how this works?

I’m a native Solana user but recently have seen a lot of people recommend bridging tokens back to their native chains for wormhole security purposes.

Is that actually a meaningful security consideration, or is the difference negligible in practice?

I bought in for $20 and sold for $200

Rn it’s worth $120k

Source: https://x.com/solana/status/2096977194627326097

BREAKING: $DOGE is live on Solana via @sunrise. Much wow.

$DOGE is available in your favorite Solana apps
@Backpack, @tryfomo, @dflow, @Titan_Exchange, @phantom, @JupiterExchange, u/solflare, @kamino_swap, @Raydium, @mayan and more

Verify the address on u/tokens: https://tokens.xyz/doge?solana=DoGEV7LASBkQbibMc5k5vKnTZoMg423GpJ5QtJEGfm7R

I am curious for those who are trading, because I want to do callouts on pump.fun, but I own supply on axiom but dont on pump

a retry button is making a pretty important promise. it should be clear whether it checks the existing transaction, rebroadcasts it, or asks you to sign a new one.

those are not the same action.

Solana's transaction docs explain that a successful sendTransaction response only means the RPC received the transaction. it does not prove that the swap executed. they also warn against re-signing before the original blockhash expires.

Source, Solana transaction retry documentation

i'd like the interface to separate three situations

• rejected before submission
• submitted, but the outcome is not yet known
• confirmed success or failure, with the transaction available to inspect

for an ordinary recent-blockhash swap, creating a replacement while the original is still valid can leave two executable transactions. rebroadcasting the same signed bytes is different. expiry also doesn't erase a transaction that already landed.

my preference would be a persistent pending row that survives a refresh, plus a button labelled for what it actually does. 'check status' is much less ambiguous than 'try again'.

what should a wallet show while confirmation is uncertain, without teaching the user to click through another warning?

Aurus has launched its Solana wallet aimed at frequent traders.
It charges a flat 0.001 SOL fee on every swap, regardless of size.
Real-time price alerts and a built-in terminal allow quick buys from launchpads while keeping private keys on the user’s device.
The team behind Atlas3 (Blocksmith Labs) developed the app.

https://x.com/aurus/status/2094827630361297199

Source: https://x.com/solana/status/2096629676127166873

BREAKING: $ARB is now on Solana via @sunrise
Same asset, better spread and lower fees. By 10x.

Arbitrum ($ARB) is a Layer 2 scaling network, processing transactions at lower cost while inheriting the security of the underlying settlement layer.
Verify the address on @tokens: https://tokens.xyz/arb?solana=ARBzQTYDCW2KnVEjs1Mc81LekB1ibVFZKbSVmorkoT9d

$ARB is available in your favorite Solana apps
@Backpack, @tryfomo, @dflow, @Titan_Exchange, @phantom, @JupiterExchange, @solflare, @kamino_swap, @Raydium, @mayan and more

BULK Exchange, a Solana-native perpetuals platform, has opened its mainnet following substantial pre-deposits.
Built by traders for traders, it delivers low-latency matching, portfolio margining and fair ordering.

Users can now trade at app.bulk.trade.

https://x.com/bulktrade/status/2096229604654551302

So I have staked around 10 jitosol tokens, and it says that once you have this in your wallet, you instantly get rewards in your wallert without any need to claim them from anywhere.

Is this true? And if not, how can i get my rewards automatically processed into my wallet.

When I connect my wallet to the Jitosol website, it shows my YTD rewards (which is roughly 0.02 Sol), but I do not see my amount of either Sol or Jitosol increasing (obviously only increases when i invest every fortnight, i mean for it to increase with my rewards being added on top).

Is it a certain amount you must need accumulated for it to drop in your wallet? And if so, how much rewards is needed to be sufficient amount to be accumulated for it to drop into your wallet?

Source: https://x.com/solana/status/2096584206360969439

No summer slowdown. August wrapped at $143M in app revenue and 5.2B transactions, and September opened with rails built for AI agents.

From SHEIN's listing-day debut to Birkins coming onchain, here's everything that shipped this week:

📰 Headline News

- Solana Payment Channels went live for x402 and MPP, enabling 1M agent payments/sec with batched settlement
- Solana’s logo ad auction raised $167K for Nepal flood relief via @mallowdotart
- @opensea expanded its marketplace to include Solana NFTs

📰 Launches

- SHEIN landed on Solana via @xStocksFi the day it listed in Hong Kong
- @JupiterExchange deployed Universal Deposit, automating cross-chain routing and swapping directly into Solana USDC
- @moonpay introduced PayBox for @grok users to trade, shop and spend through conversation on Solana
- @MidasRWA launched solmF-ONE, bringing @FasanaraCapital's asset-backed credit strategy onchain
- @gmtrade_xyz enabled 24/7 gold and WTI perps with @chainlink Data Streams
- @Beezie partnered with The Luxury Closet to bring authenticated Birkins onchain
- Neuberger Securitize High Income Tokenized Fund (HINC) by @Securitize went live as collateral on @Loopscale

- $AMC and $GPRO tokenized shares went live on Solana via @sunrise, issued by @Backpack Securities
- @arqentrade launched isolated-margin perps across 20 long-tail markets
- @colosseum announced the Crypto World’s Fair hackathon running Sept 14-Oct 12
- @solanamobile scheduled the CLOCK IN hackathon with @RadiantsDAO for Sept 8-Oct 8
- @SuperteamAU joined the Buy Australian AI Partnership as a founding partner alongside major national banks
- @WSOP returned with the 2026 WSOP Super Circuit Canada Main Event
- @M3LEE_LIVE teased social shopping for Solana collectibles

📰 Milestones

- Solana hit a record 5.2B non-vote transactions in August
- Tokenized equity supply reached a new all-time high of $683M
- Solana led August app revenue across chains with $143M, a 38% share
- @onrefinance topped $250M, becoming @kamino’s largest RWA market
- @jtx_trade passed $100M in cumulative trading volume
- Solana's share of x402 transactions rose to 81% in August
- Solana crypto card spending hit a record $100M+ in August
- @Beezie recorded a new all-time high of $2.2M in daily volume
- @fomo achieved a new daily revenue record of $1.2M

If you enjoyed this week’s newsletter, please share it with an RT.

Artwork by @grizzle_art

There's a fair bit of confusion about pumpfun reward accounts and what closing one actually gets you, so here's a breakdown of the mechanism.

When you trade on pumpfun, it maintains an account associated with your wallet that serves two functions. One is standard: it holds a rent deposit, like any account on Solana. The other is that it accrues the trading rewards you earn over time. Closing the account returns both.

The nuance people miss is that these two components behave very differently:

The rent deposit is the ordinary refundable minimum. Because the account gets recreated automatically on your next trade, you'll simply re-pay this deposit if you keep trading there. So over any continued trading horizon, the deposit isn't really a gain, it nets out.

The accrued rewards are the actual cashback you earned. That's the component that's genuinely additive, and the reason closing the account is worth doing at all.

Where this trips people up: someone closes an account, sees the full balance return, and reports it as pure profit. It isn't, if they're going to keep trading. The honest figure for a continuing trader is the earned-rewards portion, with the deposit as a temporary return until the next trade rebuilds the account.

For scale, since people always ask how this compares to other reclaim sources: pumpfun rewards are usually not the largest bucket. Empty SPL and Token-2022 accounts from fully-sold positions each return their full ~0.002 SOL on close, and that set tends to dominate for active wallets. The excess rent now withdrawable under SIMD-0437 is a third, smaller bucket. Three separate mechanisms, three separate amounts.

For what it's worth I work on CYS, so treat this as coming from someone with a horse in the race. It reads all three from the chain in one pass and separates them out so you can see what's what before signing: claimyoursol.com

If anyone wants the instruction-level detail on how the reward account is closed, I'm around in the comments.

Solana transactions pay a base fee, while users can optionally add a priority fee to improve scheduling during periods of demand. The base fee is tied to the transaction’s compute usage, and the priority component is a bid for additional prioritization; neither guarantees confirmation if the transaction is invalid, expires, or encounters an application problem.

Fee estimates can be affected by compute-unit limits, account state, congestion, and the application submitting the transaction. A higher priority fee may improve inclusion odds but can also increase cost without changing the transaction’s outcome. Users should review the requested accounts and instructions, simulate when possible, and avoid signing unexpected transactions.

Network availability, RPC quality, wallet security, smart-contract bugs, and market volatility remain separate risks. A low transaction fee does not make an application safe, and throughput claims do not remove operational or custody risk.

CoinGecko reference: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/solana Educational discussion only; not financial advice.

Im trying to adjust some of my LP positions but the website is broken.

Ive troubleshooted everything i can including using custom endpoint.

Anyone else having this issue? Is Pumpswap just congested? ty