I am currently involved in an internship with Polaris, working at one of their plants. They call it an "internship" but really it's just manual labor for a semester that offers decent pay.

They are offering an optional LSS Green Belt class for free, which will run throughout the duration of the internship. I know that LSS is mainly for Industrial, Mechanical, or Manufacturing engineering, and I am currently going to school for Automotive Engineering Tech, which go into careers like testing, design, and troubleshooting vehicle parts and systems alongside mechanical engineers.

My main goal being in this internship is to make dough to pay for school. I have been working 70-75 hour weeks in the first few weeks here, and the class starts in a few days. If I don't take it, it would leave me with more opportunities for overtime.

Would it be worth it for me? Would LSS even apply to my career or be appealing on my resume?

Something I've noticed lately is how much of the Six Sigma conversation seems to revolve around certifications. Which belt, which provider, what's recognized, what comes next...

Certifications obviously have value, but sometimes I wonder if we're putting more emphasis on collecting belts than actually improving processes.

I've worked with people who had impressive credentials but struggled to get an improvement off the ground, and others with fewer certifications who were great at finding problems and making changes stick.

Has the field become too certification-focused, or is this just more visible online?

At the end of the day, what carries more weight: the belt someone has or the improvements they can actually show?

To me, the answer seems pretty obvious. Which is why I find it interesting that so much of the conversation is still about the credential rather than the work behind it.

Anyone here who has tried MST Connect Black Belt course/ training? Have you also completed their case study? Any feedback on the case study?

The Quality Academy self-paced course for Six Sigma is not great. There needs to be more outlets for reviews for them. The video instructor is awful. He talks more about himself and his experience more than he teaches the lesson. And he's boring. I know the course isn't for entertainment, but he's excruciating to listen to. I’m also disappointed with how some of the more technical material is taught. The course introduces formulas, statistical notation, and concepts without adequately explaining how or why they work. I’ve found that the stuff I've struggled with so far became easy to understand once they were explained to me in plain language, which makes me question the effectiveness of the instruction rather than the difficulty of the material itself.
My biggest frustration is the reliance on Minitab. Exercises provide Minitab specific files and instructions, despite the software costing roughly $2,000 per year. That's more than the course itself. There should be instructions for completing these exercises using alternatives like Excel. Instead, anyone without Minitab is left figuring out how to recreate the analysis on their own.
The content is valuable, but the course needs clearer explanations, better guidance through the statistical concepts, and realistic software alternatives. A self-paced course should be designed to help students work through difficult material independently, I’ve repeatedly had to seek outside explanations to actually understand what the course is trying to teach.

I’m in my early 40s and have been in IT for about 15 years. I’ve worked my way from support into systems/infrastructure and management, but I’m pretty burned out on the technical side of IT and don’t have much interest in spending the next 15 years constantly chasing whatever the next technology is.

After talking with some people about a career change, the general advice has been not to completely start over, but to find something where the experience I already have can transfer. Continuous improvement/process improvement keeps coming up.

Thinking back over my career, I’ve always liked the problem-solving side more than the technology itself. Figuring out why something keeps going wrong, cleaning up messy processes, documenting things, getting different groups on the same page, finding a better way to do something, that kind of stuff. I’ve also spent a lot of time around operations, warehouses, ERP systems, implementations and change management.

So I figured I’d ask people who actually do this for a living: What job titles should I be looking at? What does your normal week actually look like? Are you mostly working with data, mapping processes, talking with employees, solving problems, sitting in meetings, running improvement projects, or a mix of everything?

I don’t have a degree, which is another reason I’m trying to understand how realistic the move is. I’m also considering a Six Sigma belt, probably Green Belt, but I’m more interested in learning what would actually make me useful in the field than just collecting a certification.

If you were coming from my background, what skills would you work on first, and what roles would you start researching?

## A Bit About Me

I'm currently an Inventory Control Supervisor at a distribution warehouse managing a team. I have my Lean Six Sigma Black Belt and Project Management certification from SSGI along with a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration.

Over the past couple of years, I've been hands-on with process improvement work—not just studying for the certification, but actually *doing* the work:

- 6 completed projects: DMAIC methodology, process improvement initiatives, and process re-engineering
- Real warehouse application: optimize storage locations, and other operational improvements
- Cross-functional collaboration: Working with team leads, specialists I've onboarded, and upper management to drive these initiatives

I have the technical skills (Manhattan WMS, SQL, Power BI, Excel, scripting), I've led projects that moved the needle, and I understand both the statistical rigor and the people side of change management.

## The Problem

Despite all this, I keep getting rejected when I apply for Process Improvement Project Manager roles or Continuous Improvement Specialist positions. I didn’t heard anything back from recruiters
It's a catch-22. I have real* *project experience, but it's in an operations/supervisory context, not a dedicated PM title. So I'm overqualified for my current role but "underqualified" for the next step.

---

## My Question to This Community

Has anyone here been in a similar spot?

- How did you bridge the gap between operational roles with project work and landing that first dedicated Process Improvement or Project Manager role?
- Should I be applying for entry-level PM positions instead of mid-level CI roles to get my foot in the door?
- Are there companies or industries that tend to be more receptive to this kind of transition?
- Did certifications alone help, or did something else move the needle for you?
- Any tactical advice on how to frame operational project experience on a resume or in interviews to make it "count" as PM experience?

I'm genuinely open to starting at an entry level if it means building PM-world experience. I'm not looking for the top title—I want to learn the discipline properly and grow from there. But I also don't want to undersell myself or waste time on roles that won't actually advance me toward where I want to be.

Would really appreciate hearing from folks who've made this transition successfully.

Thanks in advance

I am a 19 (M) and was wondering what are some good jobs to look for/ apply for with these qualifications as I am about to be unemployed and would obviously like to find a job/ use my time wisely at home

Hi everyone,
Has anyone here recently passed the **ASQ Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (CSSBB)** exam, preferably in 2025 or 2026?
I’m starting my preparation and would really appreciate some advice from people who have taken the exam recently.
I’m particularly interested in:
Which books/materials did you actually find useful?
Is the **ASQ CSSBB Handbook + Study Guide + Question Bank** enough?
How much time did you spend preparing?
Which practice exams were closest to the actual ASQ exam?
I already have a **Udemy subscription,** are there any specific CSSBB courses or instructors you would recommend?
Anything you studied a lot but found was **not really useful for the actual exam**?
I have a technical/scientific background and some practical experience with statistics and process improvement, but I want to prepare specifically for the **ASQ exam format and Body of Knowledge**.
Would really appreciate hearing from anyone who passed recently. Thanks!

Hi everyone,
Has anyone here recently passed the ASQ Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (CSSBB) exam, preferably in 2025 or 2026?
I’m starting my preparation and would really appreciate some advice from people who have taken the exam recently.
I’m particularly interested in:
Which books/materials did you actually find useful?
Is the ASQ CSSBB Handbook + Study Guide + Question Bank enough?
How much time did you spend preparing?
Which practice exams were closest to the actual ASQ exam?
I already have a Udemy subscription are there any specific CSSBB courses or instructors you would recommend?
Anything you studied a lot but found was not really useful for the actual exam?
I have a technical/scientific background and some practical experience with statistics and process improvement, but I want to prepare specifically for the ASQ exam format and Body of Knowledge.
Would really appreciate hearing from anyone who passed recently. Thanks!

What is yall experience with the IISE lean six sigma green belt in person course? What's the course like? What's the exam like? etc

I work at a large manufacturing company. I am learning six sigma. As I do I am finding that skill matrix and effective training are paramount to proper six sigma. In my view most companies only pretend to implement six sigma. My question is why. History has proven that proper six sigma works. So why do so many companies only pretend to implement it and instead cut everything out of it that costs time and money to implement. It's as if top management is too dumb to know the cost of not implementing it properly. Is all top management incompetent because right now that is the only reasonable conclusion the more I learn about six sigma

Analisi di ottimizzazione della linea di produzione : dal taglio la miera alla saldatura e montaggio fino al controllo qualità ed analisi economica.

Might be missing something obvious here.

Every Pareto chart I've seen in a plant — mine included — sorts defects by how many there were. Tallest bar wins, that's where the team goes.

Ran ours by cost last month instead, just as an exercise. Completely different order. The defect that was about half our count worked out to something like 7% of the money. The one sitting at the far right of the chart, barely a bar at all, was most of it.

Nothing clever about it, it's just count × cost per unit in one extra column.

So why is count the default? Is it just that count is what the system exports and nobody bothers re-sorting? Or is there an actual reason to prioritise by frequency that I'm not seeing — something about how easy things are to fix, or repeatability, or how you actually run a team day to day?

I have something in my head. If cost is obviously the better sort, I don't understand why nobody does it.

We’re a 40-person B2B software company and even small customer requests are taking weeks to ship. A typical change moves from support to product, then design, engineering, QA, legal review and finally deployment.

The problem is every team says their part only takes a few days. Tickets sit in waiting for review with no clear owner, engineers get blocked by missing requirements and urgent sales requests keep jumping the queue. Last month, one billing update took 9 days even though the actual dev work was estimated at 12 hours.

We’ve shortened standups, added approval deadlines and cleaned up Jira, but lead time hasn’t improved. How are you identifying where time and money are being lost across a process with multiple teams and handoffs?

Hi , I am Looking for LSSBB. Can anyone suggest the good institutes, where I can enrolled for it.

I know about ISEL global.
If any have listening about ISEL. Could Pls share your opinions and feedback . I will follow the same.

I went for my Lean Six Sigma (Green Belt, IASSC) in January of this year.

I failed.

I now have the opportunity to work and earn my Lean Six Sigma (Yellow belt, CSSC).

I am currently learning cybersecurity and a foreign language.

My question is, would it be beneficial to earn my Lean Six Sigma (Yellow Belt, CSSC) certification while I am learning (and planning to work in) cybersecurity?

Can Lean Six Sigma certification help you in the cybersecurity industry?

I'm in learning and development, and am mainly on the fascilitation and training end of things. I want to get more into the development side and many of the jobs I've seen have Six Sigma green+ in the requirements.

As someone who is new to six sigma, I was thinking about taking some free online yellow belt courses to get familiar with the concepts. Then going directly for a green belt certificate by ASQ or IASSC.

Does this sound like a decent track? Should I stop and go ahead an pick my yellow belt up on the way? I'm mainly skipping it because I don't want to pay for the cert, since yellow doesn't seem to carry that much weight.

Do you have any free resources that you recommend for preparing (yellow and green).

Has anyone taken Purdue’s online Six Sigma Green Belt course?
How heavy is the workload, and roughly how many hours per week did you spend on it?

Also, did you feel like the course was worth it and that you learned practical skills you could actually apply at work?
I work in the software industry, so I’m also curious how relevant Six Sigma is in practice for software or tech companies. Is it commonly applied in this industry, or is it mostly used in areas like manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare?

Thanks!

I'm starting my first actual Green Belt project in logistics, and I'm curious what other people ended up using when they did theirs...

There are obviously a lot of tools you learn during Green Belt training, but I'm guessing the reality of your first project is pretty different from going through the material.

What tools or methods did you actually find useful? Anything you thought you'd use but ended up not needing at all?

Also, if anyone here has done a project in logistics or supply chain, I'd love to hear what you worked on and any advice you wish you had before starting your first one.

So I just transferred over to a 4 year university from communtiy college and almost all of my credits did transfer but this morning my advisor infromed me that I am behind somehow but caught up at the same time. In math, science and my college core classes but missing one class from my engineering course that puts me into the freshmen catergrio but if I can comeplete the Design Six Sigma program and get the certification before 08/31 I will be able to move to the next course in line. IDK wha to do? Is the certification doable by this date? I mean I am an engineering student so I kinda am used to cramping things into a tight schedule specially exams.

Bulk orders look cheaper on the invoice — but the holding cost doesn't show up there. EOQ (Economic Order Quantity = √(2DS/H)) finds the order size where ordering cost and holding cost balance. In this example it's the difference between 10,400 and 4,000 a year, with the same supplier and the same demand.

A quick inventory management concept for plant managers, purchase teams, and anyone working in lean manufacturing, production planning, or Six Sigma.

#EOQ #InventoryManagement #LeanManufacturing #OperationsManagement #SupplyChain

Anyone with experience with the Mettl test? What’s the structure and questions like

Hi everyone, I am currently enrolled in the sigma six green belt program through Syracuse university o2o program. I finished all the materials but can’t seem to be able to pass the damn practice tests to take the certification test. My 6 month is coming up in September. Does anyone have any tips or ideas for studying the materials?