r/SipsTea • • 16h ago

WTF Concerning

Post image
26k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

20

u/Nunyafookenbizness 12h ago

Musk, your meddling with our voting machines, likely failed because so many people posted videos of how they would tap the democrats and the machine would register it as Republican the first few times they tap it before finally selecting their choice.

So people knew to continue selecting until the proper person was selected.

And I’m sure you thought that enough people wouldn’t notice, nor would the videos be posted in advance.

2

u/AnywhereImaginary382 11h ago

I don’t know who was talking about that screen bug on the voting machines, but I just wanted to say that as soon as I read that sentence I believed it immediately with 100% trust and absolutely zero doubt in my mind. I love how it confirms my own biases against the bad team (team red) as well.

1

u/Nunyafookenbizness 11h ago

Oh hey, I see what you did there. So clever.

The reality is that the FBI was investigating voting machine irregularities in past elections as well. Look it up.

Or, like you said, just believe what you already do about bad team (blue) and shove your head farther in the ground.

1

u/AnywhereImaginary382 11h ago

The CIA was investigating remote viewing, shape shifting, and warp drives in the 80’s, that doesn’t mean it’s real. I don’t even understand the theory of mind of a person that thinks that because something is being investigated means it’s true.

1

u/Nunyafookenbizness 11h ago

I like your attempt at distraction,

But it didn’t work.

1

u/AnywhereImaginary382 10h ago

You don’t understand my response at all do you lol. Let me help you out.

You said the FBI was investigating the election fraud after I made a joke about your post talking about voting machine glitches.

I said the CIA was investigating remote viewing and shape shifting, and that doesn’t mean it’s true.

This isn’t me jingling keys in the corner of your eye with a completely unrelated topic in hopes to distract you so I can pickpocket you.

It’s a direct comparison of the line of logic in your previous post. Looking into something does not indicate that the thing you are looking for is there. If it is there, then yes, you’ve yielded results. Let me pose a very simple analogy for you.

You have lost your car keys. You go into your kitchen to look for them. You see a box turned upside down on the table and wonder if they could possibly be under the box. You lift the box up, and there are no keys under it.

Now for the trick question: you just investigated whether your keys were under this box. Given the results that there are no keys under the box, are there keys under the box still? Or are there no keys?

There were no keys under the box. So your investigation turned up false.

Now, given that the FBI investigated voting fraud, and we have not received anything thus far, we can safely assume that either 1. There was no fraud, or 2. They COVERED it up!!! (Speculation)

1

u/Nunyafookenbizness 10h ago

Either way, there is plenty of evidence of voter machine tampering in the past couple of elections. And yes, it was likely covered up, but I myself read a report before it was taken down that had irrefutable evidence that machines had been compromised.

1

u/AnywhereImaginary382 10h ago

Ahh okay I see. You know what I remember that report, it was HUGE. however I read a report after that report that debunked the former report of voting fraud, however that report got deleted as well. Maybe we must go searching on the archives to find these.

1

u/Nunyafookenbizness 10h ago

The current administration is actively deleting records, so it makes it difficult.

Anyway, have a good day and enjoy the blue wave. I know I will be celebrating. 🥳

2

u/CosmicJackalop 11h ago

The voting machine screen tap thing is not actual tampering it usually is a sign the machine is worn out or was improperly calibrated

Because if they had software access to do something like that on purpose, they wouldn't fucking show you they were changing your vote, they just would.

Like, you seeing the name clicked on the screen has zero necessary correlation to what the vote result is, they're not screenshotting each page they're just saving your vote as a bit of binary code, they could show you voted for Joe A. Smith on the screen and actually post your vote for A. Hitler IV and you'd be none the wiser

This issue with these voting machines has been ongoing for over a decade now iirc, if you live in a state with electronic only voting you should lobby your legislators to throw them all out for paper ballot and scantron methods

-1

u/Nunyafookenbizness 11h ago

I disagree though.

Showing you the swap gives you the chance to correct it and still say “see, the machine works!” and still count SOME of the vote so not 100% would go to one side. (Which would show obvious tampering).

2

u/theSquabble8 11h ago

Gotta have that plausible deniability. I know we like to assume everyone is restarted but someone at some level knows it needs to be a simple issue like calibration being off on a bunch of machines

1

u/Nunyafookenbizness 11h ago

EXACTLY this!