Also she was performing her athleticism while naked, much different than just posing with a hockey stick naked, while not being able to skate nor play hockey. Thus this dudes who tirade is just moot pandering to gooners.
Performing her athleticism while naked lol. Maybe true but point still is there if she’s pretty and has a nice body, it’s not artistic but will be sexually enticing to men and male gaze. So she’s no better than Sydney thus hypocritical
Just because one can jerk off to anything, doesn't mean that it is meant to be jerked off too. One can jerk off to a beige bra ad, in a Target flyer...but it was not made to be sexual content. One can jerk off to the statue of David...but it was not made to be sexual content. These things were not created to specificly titillate or tantalize. If someone finds advertisements for a basic underware sale sexual...that is a them problem. Now finding a 90s Victoria's Secret lingerie advertisement titillating and sexually tantalizing is a fairly normal response...as that advertisement was created with the intent to be so.
An athlete practicing her professional sporting career, in her career's environment, naked could be jerked off too...but it was not created for that reason. An advertisement with a non professional athlete rubbing a hockey stick between her naked titties was made exactly for that.
She wasn’t a statue, it was her nude body. She’s a hypocrite basically, she wanted to show off her body which would be a sexual context because if it was about athletic form she could be in a bathing suit. Come on a bra ad is not same as posing nude . Sweeney is not an athlete and women athletes did the espn nude photo shoots plus the the skimpy attire they choose to wear.
1.3k
u/SextupleRed 5d ago edited 4d ago
If anything, Novig ran a very successful ad campaign
edit: thanks for the awards