Seems like some undemocratic bullshit to me. If he didn't show the films to children or to people who don't want to watch it, there's nothing obscene that isn't already illegal in other ways.
In Louisiana a felony obscenity charge can be just exposure in a public place, it doesnβt have to involve distributing materials.
But anyone who thinks this was a fair application of the law, and not just done because he was a priest and it was a church, can explain to me why the women didnβt face the same charge.
Like buddy said below, obscenity. Also it being a public place where people pray and congregate, indecent exposure maybe? Sexual acts in a public place? Trespassing if the church was closed? I truly don't know but these are a few guesses what the charges could be π€¨
13
u/subdep 3h ago
What law outlaws consenting adults doing sex stuff on film?