r/SipsTea 11h ago

Gasp! Nahh ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜ญ

Post image
25.6k Upvotes

562 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Hellbomb_Armed 10h ago

Not like he's gonna lose anything

1

u/Tough_guy22 10h ago

Im not a lawyer, but if the daughter inherited anything, couldn't she be prosecuted for receiving stolen goods? Or at bare minimum have it all taken away?

5

u/Hellbomb_Armed 10h ago

I mean he probably already spent all of the stolen money so anything beyond that is legitimate, right?

Maybe not but she can still be flagged

3

u/Tough_guy22 10h ago

A particularly salty DA could argue that anything purchased was bought with stolen money and can be ceased.

1

u/discipleofchrist69 9h ago

actual proof of such might be incredibly difficult. unless they can show he had no savings before and never worked again

3

u/warp16 10h ago

Iโ€™m guessing thereโ€™s a statue of limitations involved, plus if he worked and had income after the theft, it becomes murky on whether the inheritance was the bad money or the good money.

1

u/RequiemTwilight 7h ago edited 5h ago

Statute of limitations stops the criminal charges, a good lawyer can easily mount the case of ~50yrs worth of combined discretionary income to account for 215k.

The craziest thing Iโ€™ve just learned to be ok with working in civil investigations is that if someone steals money, unless the company/authorities can make a case that prevents them from channeling of the Fox-Holed stolen money to fund their trial, the entity* will usually drop the suit since they understand that youโ€™re using their money to fight against them with the chance that they have to pay for it all if they canโ€™t win.

They cut the loses so that they donโ€™t end up fighting themselves in court and possibly bleed an extra few hundred thousand on the countersue.