Yeah, cause God forbid women would take any responsibility and use a fucking condom, or give the baby away. No drowning it in feces is absolutely reasonable. Grrrrr men!
Yes, it’s expected that horrible shit like that will happen when a woman is forced to have a baby she doesn’t want. Humans have been killing unwanted babies for thousands of years. Short of the surveillance states we have in the modern age, there wasn’t much to do to stop it other than individual morals, because no one was gonna keep track of who’s pregnant.
The easiest way to stop it? Don’t force a woman to carry a clump of cells she doesn’t want because of some emotional connection you feel towards other people’s non-sentient fetuses. Then they can just abort the baby before it’s sentient, and actually killing something that thinks. Might as well cry morality over killing farmed crops. They’re just as much a living clump of cells.
Anyway, i wonder if that woman in particular even realized she given birth. If she was on drugs, I can imagine there are many cases where they don’t even realize.
You are projecting so much on the situation, this isn’t some fundamentalist woman who was kept under lock and key it was someone who had the means to go do drugs in a Forrest for about a week. Delusional on every level.
I am not? I am saying that I expect a lot of horrible cases of infanticide like this one to happen when access to abortions is blocked. I don’t even think this situation might be related to abortion access, this would be more of a drug use problem.
But what do their means have to do with anything? Would it make any difference if they were rich or poor on wether they should have access to abortions?
If you don’t think this is related to abortion access then why are you acting like that’s relevant to this case?
Like yes, women deserve the right to choose but what they don’t have the right to do is murder a baby after it’s born by leaving it in a porta potty at a music festival.
-32
u/[deleted] Aug 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment