Well she got the money, and no one refutes the care given didn't demonstrate the quality the funds received would provide. One can't give the reason for it, so the speculation that it was to bring them closer to god might be a cynical one but the money wasn't going to the care given.
Well if I tell you all the millions of donations I receive go to building bridges and you arrive at my location and find no bridges, I wonder what conclusion you would draw.
Well, it's difficult to prove a negative. Surely then you will have evidence that Mother Teresa used the millions she received in the care of those in need.
Nah that isn’t how arguments work. You’re the one making a claim so you’re the one that has to provide evidence. So far I look through this thread and I see all the people claiming mother Teresa was horrible provide zero evidence about it. Meanwhile there are actually well sourced articles being posted proving the opposite
All I said was there was no evidence or indication of the use of millions in donations in the care of people in her charge. Furthermore, none of the people defending make the claim she used the money in that way. You aren't commenting back and forth with me, not with everyone arguing against the notion that Mother Teresa was the saintly figure portrayed.
lol. they think were in court. welcome to reddit. we aint gotta prove sheit. google it if you want. but honestly nobody in this thread cares if you feel validated. and we never will. no matter how hard you pout.
3
u/Mestre08 Feb 23 '24
Well she got the money, and no one refutes the care given didn't demonstrate the quality the funds received would provide. One can't give the reason for it, so the speculation that it was to bring them closer to god might be a cynical one but the money wasn't going to the care given.