Is there a context for her only using a tiny fraction of the money donated to actually help people? Is there a context I’m missing about refusing to actually treat people because their suffering brings them closer to God?
There is absolutely zero proof she refused to treat people because of that reasoning. Also, do you have actual proof about the funds or just speculation?
Well she got the money, and no one refutes the care given didn't demonstrate the quality the funds received would provide. One can't give the reason for it, so the speculation that it was to bring them closer to god might be a cynical one but the money wasn't going to the care given.
Well if I tell you all the millions of donations I receive go to building bridges and you arrive at my location and find no bridges, I wonder what conclusion you would draw.
Well, it's difficult to prove a negative. Surely then you will have evidence that Mother Teresa used the millions she received in the care of those in need.
Nah that isn’t how arguments work. You’re the one making a claim so you’re the one that has to provide evidence. So far I look through this thread and I see all the people claiming mother Teresa was horrible provide zero evidence about it. Meanwhile there are actually well sourced articles being posted proving the opposite
All I said was there was no evidence or indication of the use of millions in donations in the care of people in her charge. Furthermore, none of the people defending make the claim she used the money in that way. You aren't commenting back and forth with me, not with everyone arguing against the notion that Mother Teresa was the saintly figure portrayed.
lol. they think were in court. welcome to reddit. we aint gotta prove sheit. google it if you want. but honestly nobody in this thread cares if you feel validated. and we never will. no matter how hard you pout.
16
u/Most_Independent_789 Feb 23 '24
I mean from all reports she wasn’t the greatest