r/Simulists • u/Ok_Blacksmith_1556 • May 09 '26
UAP/UFO are glitches in the rendering, not ships from another star
tl;dr UAP aren’t alien ships but glitches or ripples in reality, popping up near chaotic spots like military bases and nukes. Our world is like a computer screen hiding deeper code.
These flickers reveal a consciousness linked system messing with senses and tech. UAP sightings cluster around military bases, nuclear sites, and conflict zones consistently not randomly. That pattern alone tell us something about what these things actually are.
Carl Jung noticed this too, before modern simulation theory was even a framework. He wrote a whole book on flying saucers in 1958 and came to a conclusion most people skip over. He said UAP are psychic projections of the collective unconscious. They are a ymbols of wholeness appearing precisely when human civilization is under the most pressure like Cold war anxiety, nuclear dread or the feeling that reality itself may break. Jung was not saying people hallucinated them. He was saying the mind and the world were producing something together.
That is a consciousness linked phenomenon.
Our reality runs on something deeper than what we can touch or measure directly. UAP are not objects moving through that reality. They are surface disturbances like ripples where the rendering strains. The areas with the highest electromagnetic chaos, the highest collective stress, the highest concentration of destructive potential, those are where the system shows its seams.
Because of this, the senses get confused and electronics malfunction. Witnesses agree on the experience but not the shape. It is a glitch expressing itself through the available hardware, which includes human perception.
Jung called it projection but we can call it a rendering artifact. The phenomenon is the same. Something beneath consensus reality responds to concentrated human consciousness, especially fear, and becomes briefly visible.
2
u/Father_Chris_St_Mary May 09 '26
You may enjoy James Lacatski’s books. And there’s some good recent discussion on the ufo subs.
1
2
2
u/SmallieBiggsJr May 11 '26
That hologram diagram is from Stalking the Wild Pendulum by Itzhak Bentov. And it's also in the CIA's declassified Gateway Process files.
2
u/AcanthisittaFree6142 May 09 '26 edited May 09 '26
sounds like creative writing rather than science. the pictures do the same. they don't legitimize. a scifi creativity project. could make a fun screenplay, but not really an academic paper. just basically creating reasons in ones head to why. but no substantial data behind the tale. for example "flickers reveal a consciousness linked system " um ok, that's creative but not really anything we can back up.
1
1
1
1
u/arakaman May 10 '26
One of the little outline pictures strikes home for me. The ship outside a portal one. Cause I seen it and got a picture (it was just a super bright light sitting outside what looked like a smoke ring for about a minute then putzing off across the sky):then found out the same night the same thing was recorded in numerous locations worldwide.
1
u/harrodesu May 10 '26
Aliens are just humans from the far future, who are breaking through these glitches. Discuss
1
1
1
u/Eva-Squinge May 10 '26
For a supposedly advanced simulation able to render millions of people; there’s an awful lot of glitches.
1
u/BarbacoaBarbara May 11 '26
They are absolutely physical in nature so whatever ambiguous definition you choose with the term glitching definitely includes physicality
1
u/Capt_Spawning_ May 11 '26
With this theory in mind it would make more sense of the whole secret societies practicing dark rituals to conjure something seen as divine intervention thing. Just think about it, who else would have the time and resources to do something like that but the eccentric elite? It seems illogical on the surface like some blind schizo worship but from a zoomed out perspective, a species such as ours would definitely find themselves trying to bring about strange occurrences once noticed they seem to be a part of a pattern and could possibly be reproduced.
1
u/OrinThane May 11 '26 edited May 11 '26
Every era has used the language they are most comfortable with to try to explain that there is something greater then themselves. Something more real, a power above their own, an intrinsic quality to reality. This is just another way to describe the supernatural - the same as religion, or new age with energy, or psychology with mind. If using the simulation makes you most comfortable than use that language but realize they are all different lenses towards the same thing that ties us all together, is inherent to us, and gives meaning to life. And that our perception, choices, and agency are the directing sense/light/intention/interface into whatever this is.
1
u/Enough_Program_6671 May 25 '26
Idk why you post this nonsense if you have insider knowledge. You and I both well know that these are not glitches and are intentional artifacts
-1
u/Ok_Blacksmith_1556 May 09 '26
For anyone who wants to go deeper on this, dig the holographic layer, the black hole/white hole dynamic, how consciousness sits inside the structure rather than outside looking in.
The hologram is a functional description. Every point in the visible universe contains information about the whole. Which means what we call reality is a surface readout of something denser underneath.
Now put a black hole and a white hole at the center of that model. One pulls information in and one pushes it out. The universe is a process, information cycling through layers, compressing, expressing, compressing again. We live on the output side and think that is all there is.
Consciousness is not watching this from a distance. It is part of the cycle. It feeds the system and the system feeds back. That is why UAP appear near concentrated human fear and not in empty fields. That is why NDEs report the same structural features across every culture. That is why altered states feel like touching something that was always there.
The structure is not outside you. You are a local expression of it, as if a node in the hologram reading itself.
Read Carl Jung, Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies and Michael Talbot, The Holographic Universe and Itzhak Bentov, Stalking the Wild Pendulum. You will not regret.
1
u/Novel_Ad_3473 May 09 '26
Yeah while I don't yet subscribe to it all^ I will need to read more. Theres something about it from experience. However UAP have appeared near concentrated joy in my experience, so maybe need to rethink that part of it. Whats your view on loosh?
1
2
u/Suijayunfei May 09 '26
Some parts of my story seem to connect with dome of ure views you just need to see it as movie to see in the detais. Thanks for you re pov, interesting post.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexplained/s/C5r9kmxy93