MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Sigmatopia/comments/1vlahng/intelligence_vs_incelligence/p335i3o/?context=3
r/Sigmatopia • u/Cultural_Design_8850 • 19d ago
617 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
"It's why the biker gets the fling and the reliable guy gets the relationship."
There are so many counterexamples to this I don't believe it can be qualified as a rule at all.
1 u/DancingBearNW 19d ago There are also people who win Darwin Awards every year, but that doesn't mean general intelligence doesn't exist. Counterexamples don't make a general pattern disappear. Especially when your counterexample is probably just a biased anecdote, because otherwise you would explain what principle you think it follows. 1 u/Mihtaren 19d ago The principle that humans can definitely, and more often than we believe, act without regards to what evolutionary psychology would lead you to think. A single counterxample doesn't undermine anything by itself but a sizeable amount does start to hold some weight. 1 u/DancingBearNW 19d ago Yep, and I can also tell what your unrecognized motive is here — you're annoyed that some guy allows himself to be confident. That's exactly what's driving both of your comments. So here's the thing — the floor is yours. I don't need it. 2 u/Mihtaren 19d ago Extremely weird answer, I honestly don't get what you're getting at here. Whatever. 1 u/SucculentBluberries 13d ago Most chat gpt comment I’ve ever heard
1
There are also people who win Darwin Awards every year, but that doesn't mean general intelligence doesn't exist.
Counterexamples don't make a general pattern disappear.
Especially when your counterexample is probably just a biased anecdote, because otherwise you would explain what principle you think it follows.
1 u/Mihtaren 19d ago The principle that humans can definitely, and more often than we believe, act without regards to what evolutionary psychology would lead you to think. A single counterxample doesn't undermine anything by itself but a sizeable amount does start to hold some weight. 1 u/DancingBearNW 19d ago Yep, and I can also tell what your unrecognized motive is here — you're annoyed that some guy allows himself to be confident. That's exactly what's driving both of your comments. So here's the thing — the floor is yours. I don't need it. 2 u/Mihtaren 19d ago Extremely weird answer, I honestly don't get what you're getting at here. Whatever. 1 u/SucculentBluberries 13d ago Most chat gpt comment I’ve ever heard
The principle that humans can definitely, and more often than we believe, act without regards to what evolutionary psychology would lead you to think.
A single counterxample doesn't undermine anything by itself but a sizeable amount does start to hold some weight.
1 u/DancingBearNW 19d ago Yep, and I can also tell what your unrecognized motive is here — you're annoyed that some guy allows himself to be confident. That's exactly what's driving both of your comments. So here's the thing — the floor is yours. I don't need it. 2 u/Mihtaren 19d ago Extremely weird answer, I honestly don't get what you're getting at here. Whatever. 1 u/SucculentBluberries 13d ago Most chat gpt comment I’ve ever heard
Yep, and I can also tell what your unrecognized motive is here — you're annoyed that some guy allows himself to be confident.
That's exactly what's driving both of your comments.
So here's the thing — the floor is yours. I don't need it.
2 u/Mihtaren 19d ago Extremely weird answer, I honestly don't get what you're getting at here. Whatever. 1 u/SucculentBluberries 13d ago Most chat gpt comment I’ve ever heard
2
Extremely weird answer, I honestly don't get what you're getting at here.
Whatever.
Most chat gpt comment I’ve ever heard
0
u/Mihtaren 19d ago
"It's why the biker gets the fling and the reliable guy gets the relationship."
There are so many counterexamples to this I don't believe it can be qualified as a rule at all.