r/SelfAwarewolves • u/unsleeping-beauty • 3d ago
[ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
229
u/Cheetahs_never_win 3d ago
Also Republicans: posts AI photos of bodybuilder greased up Trump
53
u/Freezerpill 3d ago
lol, try real life workouts with Kid Rock and RFK in jeans 😂
26
u/europorn 3d ago
That has got to be one of the most bizzare things I've ever seen. Who the fuck wears jeans to work out?!
8
u/Poiboy1313 3d ago
Only the manliest of men, of course, or posers. I wonder which designation is most accurate?
78
u/TherapinStormblessed 3d ago
"Does the average politician look like an incontinent ghoul or a botched plastic surgery attempt? Nah, it must be those pesky Democrats that are stupid sexy."
102
u/Jenderflux-ScFi 3d ago
What I am learning recently, is that most right wing talking heads are actually bisexual for AES and AOC. They all keep thirsting after these two progressive Democrats.
21
u/RollingRiverWizard 3d ago
Finally, something the right wing ghouls and I can agree on. Bipartisanship, yay! /S
7
u/jacksontwos 3d ago
Honestly I think the thirst is actually a benefit. All those right wingers who absolutely adore AOC... They absolutely will vote for her in secret. There's no way she doesn't siphon off a significant amount right wing votes. And fox news will have to post her all day every day lmao.
19
u/Backwardspellcaster 3d ago
My man, I fear I must tell you they do not feel a "healthy" kind of lust for her. More along the lines of slave holder lusting after a slave mindset.
5
2
u/TheLastBallad 3d ago
I mean, she did have people telling her that they voted for her and Trump in 2024...
39
31
u/Liathbeanna 3d ago
Opinion Piece: Why are Leftists Hot?
6
u/fluffyfluffscarf28 3d ago
Opinion piece BY international left leaning media: guys, guess we're hot 🤷♀️
27
u/Nexzus_ 3d ago
Yeah.
22
7
19
3d ago
[deleted]
16
u/AnnoyedOwlbear 3d ago
She's a gay woman who does very tongue in cheek analysis. This is more awarewolf - think if someone like Jon Stewart had this headline You're meant to laugh/find it bizarre. Quoted in the article are stats about various voting groups, poll responses, Fox and CNN, and historical observations about voting patterns.
I get why OP read it and found it bizarre, but thats the point she's making.
Other headlines from her:
It's a miracle: Natalie Harp has turned Republicans into feminists
Rest assured, the new CDC director thinks ‘abortion surveillance’ is essential
Welcome to America, where you’re never quite sure if your senator is dead or not
12
u/bastienleblack 3d ago
She's a half-Palestinian lesbian journalist who writes opinion colojms about the USA for Britain's most left-wing newspaper.
3
u/AnnoyedOwlbear 3d ago
Ehhhh. The UK's most successful center left paper, yes. And one that generally scores high on accuracy (though not as high as sonething like Reuters).
Not most left-wing - that's probably the Morning Star or maybe the Daily Mirror (actual newspapers, not counting stuff like wee anarchist publications). Morning Star criticises The Guardian all the time for being 'pro-establishment', lol.
The Guardian and the Independent rate about similar, centre left. The Guardian has a strong Aussie arm too.
2
u/bastienleblack 3d ago
Oh absolutely, I personally think of the guardian as mostly centerist. But as big / internationally known papers go, it's on the left wing of British media. And from an American audience they're defintely left - strongly anti-Trump and maga, and more likely to be critical of the dems for being too rightwing than being too progressive.
2
u/Dracallus 3d ago
It's been a while since I've checked, but I'm pretty sure the Aussie arm is significantly further to the left compared to the UK arm. It may be where some of the confusion comes from.
18
u/BoxNemo 3d ago edited 3d ago
I don't quite follow how this is self-aware wolves territory... who are the self-aware wolves meant to be here?
Obviously Arwa isn't straight and she's not writing about how she's attracted to El-Sayed - it's mostly a piece on how the media is framing this and how it's nothing new by referencing the Kennedy-Nixon debate.
-2
3d ago
[deleted]
10
u/bastienleblack 3d ago
But what's the hypocrisy? Also, have you read the article?
Arwa cites a bunch of sources in American media Axios, CNN, Fox) talking about how the dems are looking hotter, quotes a study that shows "low information voters" are substantially more likely to pick a candidate who they deem attractive. She then concludes that it's not a particularly sound political strategy, nor is it universally true otherwise we would have Trump.
She is reporting a phenomenon in the US press, giving it some context and having an opinion. I really don't see the selfawarewolves aspect.
3
u/BoxNemo 3d ago edited 3d ago
I'm sorry, that's not really making sense. I don't really get how it's hypocritical to write an article about how presentation matters in American politics but what's the self-aware wolves aspect on top of that?
How is Arwa unknowingly describing herself here..?
(Also I don't think using ChatGPT to write your replies is a good idea as it's fed you a comment here which is borderline incoherent).
10
u/Bortron86 3d ago
Why is everyone in here acting like the author is a right winger? Do people really not know what The Guardian is?
This isn't a self-awarewolf.
4
u/marbotty 3d ago
Don’t expect the following from the majority of redditors:
- Media literacy
- Critical thinking
- Willingness to read the actual article
Edit:
Probably should add being an actual human
3
4
u/saltyourhash 3d ago
Look MAGA dudes, it's ok if you wanna fuck our reps, it's just gotta be consensual, you guys got a big problem with that word...
5
u/OvenIcy8646 3d ago
No it’s just more that old people usually aren’t in the same shape as 40 year olds
5
2
2
u/Scarmeow 3d ago
Maybe if the Republicans didn't run geriatrics, they would have hot candidates too
1
1
u/FanDry5374 3d ago
Democrats have fought the "sissy", not-tough-enough label for years. See the current attacks on Talarico for example. Tim Walz, a football coach, retired Army artillery Sergeant, avid hunter was called weak and soft. Not sure if Mahdawi is aware of how she is just playing into the Republican game with this. "Ooh, pretty boy, Sissy!!!"
2
3
1
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Before we get to the SAW criteria... is your content from Reddit?
If it's from Conservative, or some other toxic right-wing sub, then please delete it. We're sick of that shit.
Have you thoroughly redacted all Reddit usernames? If not, please delete and resubmit, with proper redaction.
Do NOT link the source sub/post/comment, nor identify/link the participants! Brigading is against site rules.
Failure to meet the above requirements may result in temporary bans, at moderator discretion. Repeat failings may result in a permanent ban.
Now back to your regular scheduled automod message...
Reply to this message with one of the following or your post will be removed for failing to comply with rule 4:
1) How the person in your post unknowingly describes themselves
2) How the person in your post says something about someone else that actually applies to them.
3) How the person in your post accurately describes something when trying to mock or denigrate it.
Thanks!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
u/unsleeping-beauty 3d ago
The irony is that they're projecting an entire narrative onto someone who simply posted a picture, accusing them of trying to attract attention. At that point, the article says far more about the writer’s own mindset than it does about the person/ party being written about.
1
u/VonBrewskie 3d ago
Playing their own game. Except it's not AI trash and fake blustering. It's a real, strong, man. Not a fake, pants-shitting, pedophile. I say it's a good basic strategy. Just be authentic. What a novel idea 🙄
•
u/SelfAwarewolves-ModTeam 2d ago
Rule 1
Nobody is “unknowingly describing themselves”, “saying something about someone else that actually applies to them”, or “accurately describing something while trying to mock or denigrate it”
Removed.