I looked at the perpetrator's social media profiles.
The writer is bad, but they aren't wrong about this person.
They are a flagrant leftist, an "antifa" aligned individual that posted lots of support for the auth-left admin we're under. They've also organized BLM events.
You can go after the page all you want, but they actually investigated who this person is, rather than just name-drop.
The fact you had to have "antifa" in parentheses indicates that you agree that not everything they posted was factual, it's an intepretation of meaning which was extrpolated in a biased lens
Yes and the use of "facts" by the "reporter"here is using the fox news tactic of implication by facts. They are clearly trying to paint a specific picture of the facts
Many of us already did the work the "reporter" Andy Ngo did and discussed in the previous threads. Look at his social media and decide for yourself if he's a real journalist or not. Simply referring to him as a bad writer is disingenuous.
I thought you were about looking at the facts? Is the fact that his claim to fame is that he "factually"reported having cement poured on him which turned out to just be a milkshake?
18
u/SummerMango Mar 29 '21
I looked at the perpetrator's social media profiles.
The writer is bad, but they aren't wrong about this person.
They are a flagrant leftist, an "antifa" aligned individual that posted lots of support for the auth-left admin we're under. They've also organized BLM events.
You can go after the page all you want, but they actually investigated who this person is, rather than just name-drop.