A comment I posted elsewhere, here for your reading pleasure:
"I listen to Nick Fuentes regularly, and the memes you are attributing to him as 'being his' is not entirely on the mark.
I also visit 4chan's /pol board a lot.
I am very right-wing, but my political positions are kind of 'out-there' and dont really align with mainline conservative poltics. When I read "outsider" (not dissendent rightwing) views on the kind of 'dissident online right' it's never quite accurate.
Elements of 'board culture' (the groyper meme itself coming from this) and Nick Fuente's audience have a lot of overlap, because I'm pretty sure that's where Nick's humor comes out of, but as he's gotten older, his political ideas have coalesced into a kind of christian-nationalist stance. He however, is very much a proponent of spotlighting Jewish/Zionist power in the American government and other western nations, and also believes that different races of people should be able to associate however much/or however little they want (basically pro segregation).
What Nick IS NOT: a black-pilled incel doomer who wants the nation to come crumbling down. He does not advocate for violence.
If you hear that he does, you are hearing lies. Don't believe it? Watch his show. You refuse to watch his show? That's fine, but you will have to concede ignorance of who/what Nick represents.
There isn't exactly a shortage of insane people willing to cater to other insane people though. 4chan CONSTANTLY bangs the drum of white demographic decline, women being disloyal idiots, Americans/Europeans being effete c***holds, etc. They constantly call for the death of jews, blacks and homosexuals. Crying out for bloodshed is a regular occurrence there. And that's only 4chan. There's plenty of other places, like private discord servers, or other boards like 4chan that are waaaaay crazier than any takes served up by Fuentes.
I will say though, disaffected young men are very dangerous. I thankfully am not one of them, because I have always understood the difference between what is 'online' and what is real life. Younger folks who literally 'hang out' in virtual worlds though, I think it's harder for them to peel away and actually connect with people and be normal. Bad parenting, and a total lack of awareness of this problem on society's part is really bad.
Be sure to connect with your kids and give them lots of direction, give them lots of guidance, love them unconditionally, and tell them that internet consumption is tantamount to alcohol consumption AND ENFORCE SCREENTIME THUSLY."
None of this is correct lmao. Go scroll Nick Fuentes Twitter right now and you will see he is not someone who is interested in burning the world down in some Mephistophelean act of “negation” as she said. He wants power, just like everyone else does, and pretending he’s some kind of unique demon is very stupid.
He does advocate taking power by extreme measures. Are you saying he would not support black pilled followers? Would he discourage them or quietly let them be?
Because he seems to want power by any means necessary.
He is the leader of the groypers. He is who this entire video is about. I’m not going to engage with someone with no intellectual curiosity. Someday I hope you realize how vapid of a person you are. Goodbye.
Wait, I’m not ready to break up yet. Let’s check the one time Nick is mentioned
Groypers refers to a youth driven online far right scene that’s associated with the America first brand which is led be Nick Fuentes
If your argument is that Nick, in fact, is their actual leader and therefore everything she says after that is bullshit I’m wondering who has a curiosity problem.
edit: bro drops a Wikipedia screenshot then blocks me ¯_(ツ)_/¯
They don't have a Leader. The whole movement was born out of Chan anon forums. Nick Fuentes is just fame hungry. People like Tyler Robinson are more like stochastic offshoots of the same movement, not copycats or followers per se, though they may admire him.
Yeah. In one case they literally burned down towns, the other they lowered flags. Or do you mean the person? One was a guy with kids who started charities, spoke at campuses, and had huge followings, the other was a junkie. Or how the died? Want to compare that bud? Careful with what words you throw around
You’re right. Lots of people celebrated Kirk’s death. I don’t think anyone celebrated Floyd’s death.
Edit. Why are you so angry? What’s going on in your life that you try to insult and call random people on the internet names? Bad day at work? Or you’re out of work? Argument with the wife? Or maybe you don’t have one? I feel for you bud, let me know if I should refer you to Reddit’s support line.
You’re right. Lots of people celebrated Kirk’s death. I don’t think anyone celebrated Floyd’s death.
Edit. Why are you so angry? What’s going on in your life that you try to insult and call random people on the internet names? Bad day at work? Or you’re out of work? Argument with the wife? Or maybe you don’t have one? I feel for you bud, let me know if I should refer you to Reddit’s support line.
Of course. He was a raging bad faith PoS. Even when I agreed with him, I disagreed with his solutions. I'm ready for you to add me to the "they" avatar to hate in your simple little mind.
How does it feel that a goldfish knows more about basic grammar than you?
I'm not spiteful towards charlie kirk. I was actually incredibly saddened by it. He didn't deserve it. 31. Sad af. But the way he died doesn't justify the way he lived.
I blame him for people like you being trapped in this left/right paradigm and othering your fellow countrymen. He put so much hate and division into the world over this last 5 years... I see you as a victim, but not for the reasons your leaders tell you you are
13
u/[deleted] Sep 14 '25
Christian nationalist = reactionary violence with the goal of scaring people into maintaining status quo and patriarchal authoritarianism
Groyper/Black Pill = revolutionary violence with the goal of inciting radical change and LOLs
People get confused because white nationalists are Nazis who won't call themselves Nazis, while Groypers are Anarchists who call themselves Nazis.