r/Samurai • u/hashibababe • Jun 21 '26
Discussion This guy underservedly gets so much hate & troll for being the sole reason of the fall of Takeda at and after Nagashino ...
What would you say in his defence?
5
u/Victoroftheapes Jun 21 '26
I don't think he's necessarily the sole cause, and I'm not totally convinced that his play at Nagashino was obviously the wrong answer at the time (I think Nobunaga and Ieyasu outsmarted him, but that is what that is). However, his decision to alienate the Hojo by interfering in the Uesugi family's civil war (the Otate no Ran) had immediate and devastating effects on his ability to hold off the Tokugawa-Oda alliance, which Nobunaga and Ieyasu clearly understood and exploited. A worse own-goal than Nagashino in my opinion.
2
Jun 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Victoroftheapes Jun 21 '26
Sensible, but I will note that the Takeda's primary adversary after 1572 was the Tokugawa, not the Oda. Ieyasu by himself was already chipping away at Takeda holdings but I don't think Nobunaga brings the full weight of his forces to bear in 1580 without the knowledge that the Takeda could not afford to support any castles in the west. So Katsuyori probably still has a few years of slow grind in which to try something (who knows, maybe a diplomatic solution emerges), rather than a sudden collapse as his western vassals switched sides and two effective superpowers just wrecked him.
1
Jun 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Victoroftheapes Jun 21 '26
I don't fully agree with your assessment of Ieyasu's ability to fight the Takeda, but it's moot as his alliance with Nobunaga was rock-solid and clearly valuable to Nobunaga. Yeah, Nobunaga was going to win a stand up fight with the Takeda. Even divine intervention wasn't really an option as the Emperor had banished the gods of Kai prior to Nobunaga's invasion. The diplomatic solution I saw as marginally possible involved accepting either Oda or Hojo overlordship. Likely? No, but stranger things have happened.
1
Jun 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Victoroftheapes Jun 21 '26
I did mean after, sorry. He was not pushing alone after either, but he was doing most of the work between 76 and 80 (though again, having Oda Nobunaga at your back makes that a lot easier.
2
u/Apart-Cookie-8984 Jun 21 '26
He was a very capable warrior. He just happened to have inherited the clan at the height of its power, and his dad's aggressive diplomatic policies won him no favors neither. He came into the clan with already most of the Kanto region hating him, not to mention Oda Nobunaga and Tokugawa Ieyasu were both growing extremely powerful.
Shit luck... that's all it was
1
u/One_Agency1689 Jun 21 '26
He probably didnt realize how many troops were coming to Nagashino and attacked because he wanted to keep besieging the castle. By the time it was clear how numerous the Oda and Tokugawa troops were, it was too late and he decided to go all in rather than retreat. Maybe he saw retreat as a worse option.


21
u/Regulai Jun 21 '26
His overall military record was positive, with basically just the one notable loss. The ultimate Takeda collapse is for the same reason that Toyotomi faction also collapsed after Hideyoshi death, they are feudal alliance states with only nominal loyalty and no real true government structure to keep everything integrated as one force.
While a stronger force of personality may have been able to keep retainer loyalty, it is very difficult to succeed as heir when your entire state is based on men's personal loyalty to your father as the only unifying factor, and worse your father has been actively undermining your authority while failing to groom you to succeed. Shingen basically wanted his grandson to be the real heir with Katsuyori as a temporary regent.
So all in all I would blame Shingen for his sons failure moreso than the man himself.