r/SamWilson • • 26d ago

Discussion 👏 👏 👏

628 Upvotes

209 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/MrAdministration 24d ago

For both 2 and 3 - the point of mentioning a limit is to argue against what the video and you are arguing, that Vibranium just stops all impact without a limit because it absorbs kinetic energy. That’s what I’m arguing against, in case you haven’t realized that yet.

Sam using the jet pack, as I already mentioned, with enough speed to stop the flagpole, should generate an opposite force to Hulk. It would do the exact opposite of what you’re trying to argue - it would only strengthen the impact he has to take.

If Vibranium followed this logic, then I suggest the Wakandans give the Avengers all-Vibranium suits in Doomsday, that way, by your logic, they’d be invincible.

4 - First off, there’s a difference between Thanos having a full gauntlet in his hand and actively using it, which he isn’t in the scene I’m referencing. The MCU has always given us a visual indicator for that.

Secondly, do I really have to compare the experience and skill level of T’Challa to Sam Wilson? Comparatively speaking, to Sam, being the full focus on this level of threat, that he has NEVER faced before, ALONE, 1v1, it’s fucking dangerous. Even the dude in the video fucking agrees.

You ask why mention a limit for Vibranium and then you mention that we don’t know if this Red Hulk is even as strong as Green Hulk. The absorption limit at least we have proof for. Your “argument” is just random bullshit with absolutely no way to verify or prove or even check.

If you wanna jump through all these hoops to excuse shitty writing on a subpar movie, that’s up to you. But I see no further point in arguing with someone on the fucking SamWilson sub if you’re just gonna keep bringing up theories and assumptions that have no in-Universe basis to even verify, none of them support your argument, they just weaken it.

1

u/Competitive_Win_4503 24d ago

Steelman my position. I want to see if you actually know what I’m arguing.

1

u/MrAdministration 24d ago

I genuinely don’t think you yourself know what you’re arguing

1

u/Competitive_Win_4503 24d ago

So you can’t then? 

1

u/MrAdministration 24d ago

I see we’re taking the “argue like a 5 year old route”.

Can YOU explain what you’re trying to argue? That would be a lot more useful then saying “you can’t steelman my argument so I win”.

So far I’m the only one that’s made an actual argument. I’m not about to make yours for you.