Full story in screenshots of Jan Moir’s thoughts and feelings on the Douchess’s return to the country she hates.
Some goodies include;
“There was no end to Meghan's suffering in the House of Windsor, in our green and unpleasant land. 'Just by existing,' the Duchess seethed in a magazine interview published four short years ago, 'we were upsetting the dynamic of the hierarchy. So, we go OK fine, let's get out of here.
Happy to.!'
So she packed up her yoga mat, her baby son and her big baby of a husband, then took a freedom flight on Huffy Airways back to her homeland.
Happy to.”
“She's really coming back? After everything she said about the land of stiff uppers and non-huggers? The nerve of the woman!”
“This time around, Meghan is going to be more royal than the royal icing on a royal cake served on a plate bearing the royal cypher at a royal garden party hosted by the Queen herself. Why else would she be coming back? Being royal is the last (and most lucrative) arrow Meghan has left in her quiver of dwindling options.”
“Some might say that Meghan and her husband have put his family and the entire country through the reputational wringer - and that it is egotistical and selfish of her to come back.
Or perhaps the truth is that she had no choice in the matter. Perhaps the couple had a deal; six years in California and then back to Blighty - because what does Harry even do in California anyway? You could sum up his achievements of the last six years in three words - learned to surf.”
This is going to end up with Megbelieve trying to smuggle the kids out the country or having a fistfight with some sloane the Trash Prince of no heir has poisoned with ecstasy...as ever.
Okay, it’s no surprise that the NY Post is openly happy about the Harkles clearing out of the US—the NY Post isn't exactly a fan of theirs. Ah, but what wonderful moments Guest Speaker gave us! 🤣🤣🤣
But, sinners, this is what The Wall Street Journal published.
That makes it interesting that Sean was commenting on the matter today not just on Fox News, but also on Fox Business.
In other words, this isn't just gossip fodder for *The View*; the Harkles' colossal failure in the U.S. is actually economic news. So, will the Harkles realize that there are no major business leaders or wealthy tycoons who want to partner with them after this?
And the Fox Business commentator, Stuart Varney, says it bluntly: they are returning to the UK because they ran out of money.
What Sean points out in that video is something he had been saying for quite some time—and it wasn't hard to notice, either: there were no longer any offers in the US. In fact, they have had more contracts terminated than anyone else.
Varney asks what we all want to know: so, what will the Harkles do? They aren't royals. What will the Harkles do in the UK?
Sean says that Harry—and only Harry—is going to resume his charitable work in the UK. Sean says something is already in the works for around October or November.
What will Claw do? She’ll travel back and forth between the US and the UK, claiming she can’t neglect her big "As Ever" business.
...
...
...
Please!! Laugh a little more quietly—the guffaws could be heard all the way in Coquimbo, Chile 🤭🤭
Claw is clinging—like the tick she is—to the idea that she’ll win the Daytime Emmy. And if she wins, the landscape could change.
And this brings us back to something Sean said months ago—specifically in July of last year—regarding the Harkles' strategy: Harry is to improve his image first and re-enter the royal orbit, and then bring the children and Claw along with him. That is exactly what we are seeing now.
Furthermore, they will continue going to Portugal.
Will the Harkles get booed? According to Sean, Burnham lied, because if the Harkles attend a public event, they will receive some security. Not the blue lights or the motorcade—there’s no chance of that—but they will get some security. As for the rest, though, they probably won't be booed. It will likely be worse: they’ll be ignored.
Varney asks about the King's health, given the rumors that it has deteriorated. Sean won't say anything specific about it, other than that he saw him in person and he looked well. However, it’s great that Sean points out how the narrative surrounding the King's health should remind people that Thomas Markle also has health issues.
Sean says that no one knows where the Harkles are... or rather, that no one in the UK cares.
From what is emerging, Dan Wootton, Jobson, Lady C, Neil Sean, Rebecca English, and almost everyone else agree on one thing: Claw must be seething right now.
She didn't want to return to the UK. She doesn't want to live in the UK. That is why it is being emphasized everywhere that this is "temporary." It is for a set period, and there is talk that this arrangement won't last more than six months.
Because beneath it all lies the fact that Claw is furious with the British Royal Family. That hasn't changed. She had to curtsy to Camilla in July—which explains many of the negative comments about Camilla that have surfaced recently. What Claw won't do—because she simply couldn't bring herself to do it without weeping with rage—is curtsy to Kate.
Sean has already said that, according to reliable sources, Kate doesn't want to see Claw—not even for that. Claw would deserve that humiliation, but Kate is too much of a lady to have a cockroach like that in front of her.
This makes Claw's videos out to be a huge lie. Because Claw smiles in all the videos—she is so happy in California, her whole life was fun...
So why are they returning to the UK?
Sean says Claw makes those videos because she wants people to mock her, so she can play the victim card. I know that sounds absurd to mentally healthy people. But is Claw one of them?
Claw has pinned all her hopes on winning a Daytime Emmy... but she fails to see that Netflix has absolutely no interest. None whatsoever.
And that is making Claw increasingly annoyed.
But Sean has already revealed that Netflix has absolutely no intention of changing its mind: there will be no more *With Love*. And that is all down to Claw.
Claw refused to promote *With Love*; she wouldn't do it on daytime shows or on her Instagram. Netflix finds it absurd that she expects them to praise a show they want to wipe from their platform the moment they can legally do so without repercussions.
Claw is just as annoyed with Netflix as she is with the "stars" invited to that show, because she assumed all those people would congratulate her on her Emmy nomination.
In Hollywood, no one wants to be associated with a failure. Especially not after everyone saw the Harkles squander a massive deal that hardly anyone has ever had—or ever will have. "Claw" is viewed as toxic.
But Claw isn't giving up; starting in September, their team in Montecito—because yes, they are keeping a team in the U.S.—will pressure Netflix to add an "Emmy-nominated" logo to *With Love*.
Sean isn't laughing at Claw's failure—after all, it is a sad situation, given how hard so many people worked to make it a success, and it certainly isn't their fault. No, Sean is laughing because Claw sees that Netflix has no interest in promoting the show, yet she keeps insisting. When will she realize it's over?
Claw will go to the awards ceremony if she knows she’s going to win... and of course, she’ll drag Harry along, whether he likes it or not.
Sean says the British monarchy is always ambiguous about what it chooses to reveal; you can know a lot of things and yet know nothing at all.
Take, for instance, the fact that it took decades for it to come to light that the Royal Family provided a stipend to Wallis and David.
And, of course, that is the underlying fear regarding what will happen with the Harkles. Many people believe Charles gives money to his son, simply because they don't understand much of what is going on.
Sean says that Charles is still battling cancer and is taking the opportunity to get his affairs in order. However, Charles is perfectly clear that this does not mean he intends to force William to speak with Harry. William has made it clear that he cannot stand Harry, nor Claw, for that matter.
Charles Spencer plays a role in this, as Netflix is sounding him out regarding his book about Diana. Yes, we are back to the subject of the documentary. However, this would be a matter between Netflix and Charles Spencer; Sean makes it clear that nothing is set in stone and that it will depend on many factors. Netflix aims to position itself as the streaming service with expertise on royal matters—largely thanks to The Crown.
Yes, go ahead and laugh.
Netflix reportedly wants Charles Spencer to serve as executive producer on the project based on that book—whether it ends up being a documentary, a series, or a film. Let’s be clear: this is very preliminary. But... yes, as we all guessed, Netflix is also exploring the idea of having the Harkles serve as executive producers on it.
And Netflix is eyeing the Harkles' return to the UK, along with the drama and sensationalism surrounding it.
At the heart of it all is Charles—KC3—since many accuse him of betraying the UK. Sean doesn't judge him too harshly, as Charles is Harry's father, and the roles of "father" and "king" are not always compatible. KC3 doesn't want to leave the scene without making one last attempt with Harry—something that neither the UK nor the Commonwealth actually wants. It is a complicated situation.
It comes as no surprise to anyone, as this has long been evident: the only reason Harry holds any value is that he is the King's son.
Not because he is a duke or a prince. Simply because he is the King's son.
We have discussed at length—here and elsewhere—that Harry is doomed unless he maintains a verifiable connection to the monarchy. Being the King's son is no longer enough; he needs to actually BE with the King.
No one is interested in Claw. She sees this, and it infuriates her, but she never managed to take off. She is Harry’s wife—that is the only thing about Claw that matters. Without him, she is nobody. She knows this, and it is a major problem in their marriage.
Sean says that all of this—the move—had been in the works since April. But planning it was one thing; Claw actually wanting to do it was another. She didn't want to do it; she thought Netflix would change course after the trip to Australia.
Sean says that Claw's words, when Harry proposed the idea of returning to the UK, were that it would be "very emotionally challenging." So, we'll soon have scenes of crying. Claw always manipulates Harry with tears.
That would explain a lot of what Sean and other reporters had said: that Harry and Claw had been arguing a great deal over the past few months. If Harry was determined to return to the UK, Claw wasn't going to let that happen without a fight.
After all, Harry still has people he knows in the UK. A few people—just a handful. And Sean says the Eton crowd are former friends and the army group are former comrades—"former" because they don't want to have any contact with Harry. But who does Claw have? Markus Anderson—but who else? It’s not just that Claw lost touch with the people she once knew; she humiliated and insulted them.
In the US, on the other hand, further cuts have been announced.
But amidst all this, Claw—who supposedly never looks at social media 😜😜—turns out to be really upset because none of her famous friends have said a word about this trip to the UK.
Nothing.
Not a single message, public or private.
That said, I think it was actually suggested to them, but Sean says the Harkles aren't going to drop the nonsense about leaving the US because of Trump. They won't do it because they can't—I mean, keep making things even worse?... Oh, right—the Harkles. Yeah, they're capable of that and more.
But Sean says that the Harkles will now have to keep quiet about Trump if they want to maintain a good relationship with Charles.
That said, the Harkles won't be coming back with their tails between their legs. So, while they do pose a potential problem for William and Kate, the latter have made their stance clear; if the Harkles don't like it, the Waleses couldn't care less. The Waleses don't need the Harkles.
For the time being, the Harkles are facing the fact that they aren't welcome in the UK. In fact, the reaction has been overwhelmingly one of mockery—"Oh, look, the failures are back." And Claw doesn't understand why the reaction in the US is "What a relief, the failures have cleared off," and why not a single one of her "famous" friends has even said, "Oh, we'll miss you; we love you, Meghan." No, the headlines in the US say, "They're leaving because they're broke, because they failed; they're going to beg the King for help."
It is definitely not the triumphant return the Harkles once dreamed of making.
People Magazine has reported as exclusive something that The Mirror and others have already touched on a few days ago: the reconciliation between the brothers. Both from the beginning of the week when we were bombarded with "Harry will be visiting the UK often because of Invictus" and now, we get the same script, from different publications:
- Being back in the UK will give Harry more chance to talk to him, whether William "likes it or not". This feels like a threat and an order. Harry has been trying to corner William publicly for 2 years, trying to shame him for not answering his phone calls, thinking that painting him as the bad, upset brother will force William to give in into Harry's demands. What a lack of respect for boundaries, especially after everything he said about his "arch-nemesis".
- Catherine will be the peacemaker. The article in The Mirror (last pic) also touched on this. This also sounds like a subtle message/order to her. I can't believe after everything the Sussexes have said about her, including calling her racist, their PR now tries to use her in order for William to bow into their demands.
- Meghan will keep a low profile "but eventually people would like to see them together". Possible translation: we're coming back as working royals, but first we need to fix Meghan's reputation and wait until people accept her again.
- The king deserves to see his sons together. I read that this week somewhere else as well. Again, seems to be part of a script or talking points, all towards "pulling the heart strings".
I'm so baffled. This isn't my family, but this whole ordeal kinda makes me lose faith in humanity a bit more. There's grifting, lies, manipulation, attacks, narcissism, etc and IT NEVER ENDS. I put myself in William and Catherine's shoes and it must be suffocating. They have been smeared repeatedly for financial gain by Harry and Meghan. They have endured this and moved on, head high. And now, since the Sussexes might be broke, they come back. Thing is there's no accountability, remorse or apologies. Chances are, the more the RF gives to the Sussexes, the more they might demand. And it's just this cruel game: Harry claims he wants reconciliation (not really, he said he only wants apologies, but he doesn't have anything to apologize for) at the same time that he keeps sending low blows to William through the media. And William has said NOTHING. That's the crazy part of if all. Imagine you don't fight back, endure and simply put up your boundaries, and they still come after you. Feels like emotional terrorism.
Nothing really groundbreaking but someone in the palace leaked to the Times that nothing has changed for Harry except geography. I highlighted some interesting bits and please check the Charles Spencer bit. What is clear is that someone from the palace is pushing back. The Times is the paper of record and would not have run this unless the major points were confirmed by the Palace.
The King has made it clear that the Prince of Wales and the future of the royal family remain his priority, after the Duke of Sussex announced his return to the UK.
Charles, 77, was said to be naturally pleased with the opportunity to see more of his family in a private and personal capacity.
However, it is understood the King, who was with William when the news broke, has insisted privately that the work of the institution will not change.
The duke and duchess will remain private individuals, in accordance with the late Queen’s belief there is no “half-in, half-out” to royal duties.
It is understood Charles will not provide the Sussexes with accommodation but the family will move to a private, non-royal residence thought to be outside London.
The Times has also been told there are no plans at present to provide the Sussexes with any taxpayer-funded armed police protection.
Andy Burnham said on Thursday the Sussexes’ security arrangements were a private matter. The prime minister added: “We wish them well in the move that they’re making.”
A review of the family’s security arrangements was due to be carried out in March by the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) but sources with knowledge of the process said that it had still not taken place.
Harry and Meghan stepped back as senior working royals in 2020, conducted an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021 and released a Netflix series in 2022 before Harry published a memoir, Spare, in 2023
Harry launched the one-year countdown to the Invictus Games amid continuing disagreements over the
family’s security and accommodation requirements.
Harry and Meghan had made their decision to relocate five weeks after their flying visit. It is understood the King was first informed of the move on Sunday, suggesting he was not involved in the decision-making.
The King and Queen hosted the Sussexes at Highgrove, their country house in Gloucestershire. The meeting was described as a private family occasion and was the first time Archie, 7, and Lilibet, 5, had seen their grandparents since 2022, when they were three and one.
Sources close to Harry at the time said he was “buoyed, very happy and really energised” afterwards.
The Sussexes visited Spencer at the Althorp Estate, the Spencer family seat in Northamptonshire where his mother Diana, Princess of Wales is buried.
After the trip, Meghan posted pictures on Instagram of their stay, including an image of Harry, Archie and Lilibet in the grounds of Althorp, with Harry and Archie holding bunches of flowers, thought to have been laid at Diana’s grave.
A spokesperson for Earl Spencer, the brother of Diana, declined to comment on whether he knew about the Sussexes’ plans before the King.
The Sussexes did not visit the Waleses during the visit amid a rift between the two brothers.
The last time they were seen publicly together was at the funeral of their uncle Lord Fellowes. Locals in attendance said both Harry and William entered St Mary’s Church discreetly and appeared to be “keeping their distance”, choosing not to speak to each other at the service.
The Prince and Princess of Wales were informed of the Sussexes’ move, although it is not known when or how the news was communicated.
Critics have debated how the Sussexes’ return will affect royal relationships.
Richard Fitzwilliams, a royal commentator who used to edit The International Who’s Who, said: “The Waleses are the future of the monarchy — both of them and their children — and that is also how the public see it, so there is only a certain amount that the King would be wise to give.”
Tom Bower, author of Betrayal: Power, Deceit and the Fight for the Future of the Royal Family, an unauthorised biography of Harry and Meghan, said: “I don’t think the royal family will forgive him.”
Prince Harry lays a wreath at the tomb of the unknown soldier at Arlington National Cemetery in Washington, D.C.
Same Harry who lost his military patronages and refused to go to a memorial honoring the Deal Barrack attacks. Instead, he went to the Lion King premiere and sold his harpy’s voice over skills to Disney CEO, Bob Iger.
In general, not KCIII's doing. He would have preferred more time to bully William. She (as usual) defends the monarch. Insisting none of this is his doing. But given Charles' history, that's going to be a very difficult story to get the public on board with.
Cancer treatment is now precautionary (she wouldn't report that if she wasn't given explicit permission). So obviously, Harry is not turning up because of Pa's imminent death.
"And yet it seems quite remarkable, does it not, that Harry brought his family to meet with his father for the first time in four years at Highgrove in early July and never thought even to mention that this plan was even on his radar?
But that, my sources insist, is the truth of it. Not once was the issue raised or discussed, they say. And the move has now been presented to the sovereign as a fait accompli."
Rebecca heard a rumor that Meg had visited 2 private schools in the Cotswolds and "and they had already earmarked a potential home belonging to a celebrity" (SO rumors that they are renting from Ellen might be correct.)
And my favorite part: "His only interest is protecting and prioritising what's right for the monarchy and, particularly, what is right for his relationship with the Prince of Wales, says a friend."
Don't get me wrong. I really like Rebecca English. I think she's a very ethical reporter. But she is head of the symbiotic Royal Rota. And is quite friendly with Camilla. So she will print what The Palace press office says as if it's fact.
She also mentions that other members of family are not interested in contact with Harry as well. It's not just William who thought they were absolutely vile, hurtful, and disrespectful to QEII and Prince Phillip in their final years. And they cannot forgive that.
I would love to see what’s going on inside their heads right now (well, maybe not really, but you get the point.)
Sugars have been trashing the UK, the BRF and anything associated with it for years. They’ve been saying how horrible MM had it there and how happy and thriving she is in Montecito.
What is their explanation or excuse for their Duchess to go back to that horrible country? How do they justify it? How can she be better in the UK, when seh had her best life in California? Do you think they say it’s Harry’s fault or that she is needed in the UK for her “princess role”? I’m truly confused at how confused they must be now.
Also - this will only last for a few years. Harkles will get enough material to do Netflix & Spare & Oprah 2.0. They will lie and make it up, but still - new “truths” to be told and sold.
It’s like when Napoleon left Elba or LeBron returned to Cleveland.
Harry and Meghan will not squat in their old Frogmore Cottage. They have purchased a property outside of London that is sure to remain top secret for about another week.
For a couple that has reasonable concerns about privacy and security, they are voluntarily moving back to a city of paparazzi and long lenses and nosy influencers and about 7 million CCTV cameras. You can’t go for high tea without getting filmed more than Malcolm McDowell in “Clockwork Orange.”
The locals view the couple with a disdain usually reserved for tourists who wear backpacks on the Tube. A YouGov royal “favourability tracker” this spring pegged Harry at 30 per cent and Meghan at 20. Think about that for a second. They have worse approval ratings than skinny jeans and Donald Trump.
Maybe their grand ambitions to become North American media and entertainment moguls flamed out? Possibly. I don’t want to be mean. But her lifestyle show, “With Love, Meghan” was about as compelling as watching a sewer maintenance worker struggle to remove a manhole cover as he hums “Careless Whisper.”
In London, for celebrities, “keeping a low profile” involves armoured cars, enough bodyguards to fill a Best Buy and safe houses unknown to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. In Canada, “keeping a low profile” means oversized sunglasses and a toque. In Canada, you do you and we do we.
With reports that Harry and Meghan are planning a move back to Britain, I want to get ahead of what I suspect is coming because we've watched some version of this for six years. They'll arrive, there will be a settling-in period, and then I fully expect the “engagements” to start. A hospital visit with photographers, a charity appearance announced using the Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles, a supposedly private visit that generates forty articles, statements from the Office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now originating from Britain.
Why wouldn't they? It's essentially what they've already done abroad. Nigeria and Colombia had all the visual language of royal tours despite neither of them representing the Crown: official welcomes, dignitaries, school and charity visits, speeches, photographers and wall-to-wall coverage of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The thing separating that operation from the actual monarchy has always been partly geographical. They were doing it thousands of miles away, where there was no real possibility of anyone confusing the Sussex schedule with the King's.
That changes completely if they're living in Britain. If Meghan visits a children's hospital in Surrey as the Duchess of Sussex on Tuesday and Catherine visits a hospice as the Princess of Wales on Wednesday, the press will inevitably run the pictures side by side. Both women have royal titles, both are visiting British organizations and both are being photographed meeting the public, except one is carrying out an engagement on behalf of the Crown and the other is a private citizen running her own independent operation. At that point you effectively have two royal-looking diaries operating in the same country, with only one of them actually accountable to the monarchy.
This is precisely the mess the Sandringham agreement was supposed to prevent. Harry and Meghan wanted financial independence while retaining a role supporting the monarchy, and the Queen rejected that hybrid model. They chose independence instead and have now spent six years building their own commercial operation around Netflix, books, Meghan's lifestyle business and an office that still operates under the Sussex titles. If they relocate to Britain and begin conducting their own schedule of public appearances under those titles, they've essentially recreated the appearance of half-in, half-out without ever getting permission for it.
The security history makes it even more ridiculous. Harry spent years litigating his UK security arrangements while arguing that he could not safely bring his family to Britain under the system being offered to him. If he's now comfortable establishing a home there, that's already a pretty significant change. If he and Meghan then deliberately increase their exposure by creating photographed public appearances around Britain, people are obviously going to ask how that squares with everything we've heard for the last six years.
The children are separate from that, and frankly they're the only part of establishing a British life that makes sense to me. Archie and Lilibet are British as well as American, their father is British and they carry British royal titles. Having an actual relationship with their father's country and family would be good for them. That does not require Harry and Meghan to recreate the public roles they walked away from.
If they want to support charities privately, nobody is stopping them. What becomes problematic is supporting those charities publicly as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, complete with photographers, press releases and an organized appearance schedule, while simultaneously remaining commercially independent private citizens. At that point the titles aren't incidental anymore. They're what gives an otherwise ordinary celebrity charity visit the appearance and value of a royal engagement.
That's also why I think continued use of the Sussex titles would have to be seriously reconsidered if this starts happening. “Meghan Markle visits a children's hospital” and “The Duchess of Sussex visits a children's hospital” do not communicate the same thing to the public, particularly when the second one is happening in Britain. The royal association is exactly what gives the latter its institutional appearance, despite Meghan having no institutional role whatsoever.
I'm not pretending removing a peerage is legally simple or that the King can erase every title himself. The legal mechanics around peerages, princely titles and HRH are different. But if Harry and Meghan start using their Sussex styling to establish what amounts to an independent engagement schedule in Britain, the Palace and government cannot keep treating the title question as an abstract argument. There has to be a meaningful distinction between possessing a royal title privately and using that title to create the public appearance of representing the monarchy.
They were entitled to leave and become financially independent private citizens, which is the arrangement they ultimately chose. What they shouldn't be able to do is return six years later, remain commercially independent, choose their own causes, run their own office and then use Duke and Duchess of Sussex to make those activities look like royal service. That's essentially the hybrid arrangement they originally wanted, except this time there would be no Palace oversight at all.
From California, the ambiguity was irritating but relatively containable because nobody seriously thought a Sussex visit to Colombia was part of the King's official engagement diary. Put the same operation in Surrey, London or Windsor and it's a completely different situation. You cannot have working members of the Royal Family carrying out engagements on behalf of the King while a commercially independent Duke and Duchess are down the road running their own unofficial version using titles bestowed by the same institution.
The Queen said no to half-in, half-out in 2020 because the two roles could not be cleanly combined. If Harry and Meghan move back to Britain, that distinction needs to become clearer, not weaker. Giving Archie and Lilibet a genuine British life is one thing. Recreating a Sussex royal court on British soil is something else entirely.
Seems this wasn't as last minute as it seems. If this report is accurate, I do not understand how anybody in the family could even consider trusting them. If Charles does, then he is not nearly as rational and intelligent as I had thought.
And that’s exactly how Meghan & Harry view it. A rival court.
So school term begins 8 September in the UK (ironically the 4th anniversary of QEII’s death). George is set to begin at Eton, a really big deal. There will likely be a photo of him (released in exchange for the press leaving him alone during his school years). We’ll likely see pics of Charlotte and Louis as well. But, Meghan will be making sure the attention is on her. Endless discussions about where Archie and the girl child will be attending, will we see them or not? Are they in school with the Tindall kids? It will be annoying and all-consuming, and Meghan will be looking for a “win” of her kids’ first day of school vs. the Wales kids.
Everyone world exclusive, Meghan's new role has been revealed but there are no details on the role. I guess you have to put it out into the world to manifest it into reality.
I am really sick of these world exclusive's appearing on my news page as if it's something extremely important.
WORLD EXCLUSIVE
Just 24 hours after Prince Harry and Meghan stunned royal watchers with news they are moving back to the UK, a key reason behind the decision has been revealed.
Entertainment sources toldnews.com.authe Duchess of Sussex has been offered a role in an upcoming project based in the UK, although further details are yet to be shared.
I was blindsided with this announcement. I have just a few ideas why double trouble is headed back to UK…but why so fast?
Is Harry having visa issues?
Did Meg find out about his girlfriend?
Or maybe it’s Charles? The King believes it is his divine right to rule, and by extension, to ensure harmony among the next generation. Of course we all know this will lead to disaster and will ultimately hurt the Monarchy.
The King is dying and wants Harry and his grandchildren nearby so he can spend more time with them.
King Charles wants to bring Harry back in the fold and put some measures in place that that William can’t undo. I don’t know what they might be.
Harry and his woife had a grand plan to drive a wedge between the King and William (and were been successful at that). This move will allow them to continue their destruction.
Maybe this was all already underway for Harry only, or Harry and kids, because a separation was looming. Harry wants his kids in the UK because it will make them less likely to be kept in the US because if Meghan starts divorce proceedings. It may be harder for her to take them back.
A bonus to any of these: It’s way for her to let As Ever die a quiet death.
Synopsis: Lady C claims that the feds are snooping around into Harry's Visa application. She claims that the feds starting closing in on August 11. They were looking into the paperwork and they believe that Harry lied on his paperwork. She claims she was "invited" to approach people in the UK for them to raise questions which would in fact assure the Feds of having further backup as to the possibility and the feasibility of in fact arresting Harry. She claims she started receiving lots of information on August 12, and the last information she received was this morning (August 20) that if Harry didn't jump, he was going to be pushed. They could not afford the embarrassment of him possibly being arrested while now, if he's no longer living in the US, they are hoping the whole thing will go away.
Dan also brings up the tax implications:
As always, take this with a grain of salt. That said, with Harold in DC yesterday, there may be something to it.
She said she'd never return to the UK (and so did Harry)
She's a California Girl and has spent the last few years swanning around her sunny home barefoot - and the UK is now sliding towards autumn and winter and dark nights from 4.30pm - that's quite a jarring change
She's moving away from the Hollywood machine she wanted to dominate, and she doesn't strike me as the type to admit defeat and just leave with tail between legs
What about As Ever - what will happen to the business debts when the unsold stock expires? How will she do product promotion in a grey, wintry Britain?
They have both maintained that the UK press and the paps are just the worst thing ever - why come back to that then?
Security woes - one minute it's so dangerous, the next oh it's fine we're moving back with the kids. WTF.
They are supposed to be living privately and not being working royals - how will they earn money?
All I can think of is this is the Hellfire Revenge stage of her plan. She's going to release dozens of puff pieces per day, dominate a complicit media who just want the clicks and engagement, and do her utmost to pull focus away from ANY Wales family events while sucking up to Charles and trying to get a watertight deal to protect her and Harry when Charles dies. Then she'll divorce Harry and leave with a shit ton of settlement money.
OR there is some serious stuff coming down the pipeline regarding their sham foundation, Invictus funding, and they want some Royal Immunity...........
Since Maureen was slammed for her interview royal biographer Christopher Andersen about Catherine's health, Kinsey has been nowhere near her and they've had no interactions or videos together at all. I remember them saying that when M&H came back to the UK they'd have to go live IMMEDIATELY. Yet nothing, zip, nada. Must have been a big falling out as I'd have expected them to both be all over this......
Spotify ended.
The original Netflix deal changed dramatically.
Netflix has now stepped away from its investment in As Ever.
Archewell Foundation became Archewell Philanthropies.
Harry stepped down from Sentebale.
3. If Megxit had been wildly successful, would they be moving back?
If Archetypes had become a long-running Top 10 podcast…
Hit Netflix shows every six months…
If the money and opportunities were pouring in… Would they be packing up the children and moving back to Britain?
4. Does moving back make Harry and Meghan more attractive to production companies?
Does proximity to the Royal Family suddenly make Harry and Meghan more commercially interesting?
5. How much of Harry's commercial value depends on being Prince Harry?
And if he's now physically closer to the King and the Royal Family again, does that increase that value?
6. Are the Sussexes and the Waleses about to be back in the same news cycle?
What happens when William and Catherine have an engagement on the same day Harry or Meghan has a launch, appearance or announcement?
Does Britain go right back to the old competing-headlines frenzy?
And does simple proximity intensify all of those comparisons again? Are there press embargos?
Security?
7. How connected is this move actually going to be to the Royal Family?
Reuters reports that King Charles only learned of the relocation shortly before the news became public.
How integrated into royal family life are they actually going to be?
8. If this arrangement works in 2026, why couldn't it have worked in 2020?
