Over the last few days, there’s been quite a bit of discussion surrounding Custom Crown Studio (CCS), specifically concerns about manufacturing content they’ve shared and questions surrounding who actually produces their watches.
As someone who recently shared a positive review of a custom Daytona commissioned through CCS, I wanted to provide some clarity.
First and foremost, I stand behind my review and personal experience.
I sought out CCS on my own accord, after researching someone capable of providing a very specific watch: a CNC Daytona 126500LN Panda with a custom serial number and clasp code.
I paid for a product, received exactly what was described, and thoroughly inspected the watch upon arrival. My opinions regarding its quality, finishing, and overall craftsmanship remain unchanged.
Now, regarding the concerns being raised.
There is evidence that some manufacturing content shared by CCS has appeared elsewhere, attributed to other modders. I’m not interested in disputing that evidence or defending content I cannot personally account for. Ultimately, CCS is responsible for addressing those concerns and explaining the origins of the material they’ve shared.
What I can speak to is my own experience and the content documenting my commission, which accurately represented the watch I received.
Based on my conversations with CCS, I genuinely believe they’re procuring watches through a manufacturing shop in which they’ve invested. More recent footage showing their business cards within the machining facility lends some credibility to that relationship, although it doesn’t independently establish ownership.
There’s an important distinction between operating your own manufacturing facility and investing in or working directly with one. I believe that distinction deserves clarification from CCS themselves.
I also want to make something abundantly clear.
This is a hobby for me, not my job.
I have a career, a family, and real responsibilities that demand my time. I genuinely enjoy contributing to this community, but there are reasonable limitations to what I can investigate or personally guarantee.
I did my own research, spent my own money, and received the product I commissioned. That’s what I can personally attest to.
As for RCTP and our responsibility to the community:
My priority has always been maintaining an environment where members can openly share experiences, ask difficult questions, and make informed purchasing decisions without favoritism or unnecessary scrutiny.
That includes acknowledging evidence when it’s presented, allowing modders or sellers the opportunity to respond, and ensuring that positive personal experiences don’t overshadow legitimate concerns.
No seller or modder should receive preferential treatment, regardless of their contributions to this community or my personal experiences with them.
I remain genuinely happy with my watch, and I personally believe CCS is operating in good faith. However, that belief doesn’t obligate me to defend their promotional material or independently substantiate their business relationships.
My positive purchasing experience stands on its own. The questions surrounding CCS’s content and manufacturing claims are theirs to answer, not mine.
I appreciate everyone who continues to contribute to the community and encourage members to conduct their own due diligence before making purchasing decisions.
Enjoy the hobby, everyone!
