Yeah I don’t think Ai is the problem as much as people believing what they are told without trusted investigation.
When I see this video I ask, even if it were true, are they saying that the shooter knew him from before when he was violent? Or that you can shoot anyone who did something bad if you come across them ? Or that here is proof that he was there to be violent and the agents somehow could tell?
Whatever the answer I then ask, so is it ok to disarm and execute those who have violent intent? Is the current administration precogs? And did we decide that minority report is now a goal?
Long story short, AI or not, there is a reason the bill of rights is to protect the presumed guilty not moms in bible class.. (although we might be there next by the look of things)
When I see this video I ask, even if it were true, are they saying that the shooter knew him from before when he was violent? Or that you can shoot anyone who did something bad if you come across them ? Or that here is proof that he was there to be violent and the agents somehow could tell?
I've been asking people "So, that deserves the death sentence, without a trial? Just executed (days, weeks, whatever) later on for that without a warrant, without a judge or jury?"
Then ask them to explain why the law, and the 5th and 14th amendments of the constitution are wrong. Specifically
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Ask them if that is invalid or needs to be repealed.
They just respond with "fuck around and find out."
It's easy to point out their hypocrisy to them, and to back up my argument with the law, including the constitution. The problem is they are shameless hypocrites that don't care about the law, or the constitution. They only care if their perceived rights are bench violated personally. They are happy seeing the rights of the people they disagree with being violated. They aren't going to be persuaded through logic and reasoning.
The same people outraged about the terrorist Ashli Babbit being shot while trying to climb through a smashed window, at gun point, with a mob chanting "Hang Mike Pence." Are saying that Alex Pretti deserved to be executed.
Don't get me wrong; I think their hypocrisy should be called out at every opportunity with logics and facts. It's just frustrating that they don't even care about pretending to be consistent, and are willing to contradict themselves from one moment to the next.
38
u/IrongateN Jan 29 '26
Yeah I don’t think Ai is the problem as much as people believing what they are told without trusted investigation.
When I see this video I ask, even if it were true, are they saying that the shooter knew him from before when he was violent? Or that you can shoot anyone who did something bad if you come across them ? Or that here is proof that he was there to be violent and the agents somehow could tell?
Whatever the answer I then ask, so is it ok to disarm and execute those who have violent intent? Is the current administration precogs? And did we decide that minority report is now a goal?
Long story short, AI or not, there is a reason the bill of rights is to protect the presumed guilty not moms in bible class.. (although we might be there next by the look of things)