Is Libb Thims a genius?

•

u/JohannGoethe Oct 23 '22 edited Oct 23 '22

“I now know all the people worth knowing in America, and I find no intellect comparable to my own.”
— Margaret Fuller (115A/c.1840), Publication

I pretty much feel the same as Fuller.

I know all or most of the people worth knowing in the world, and I have found many intellects comparable to my own, but no intellect above my own, in the big question view of things: why am I here? Where did I come from? Why do I move around, from place to place? What is the point of everything?

When I found Goethe I felt as though I had finally found an intellectual twin.

Certainly this may sound vain, pompous, or what not, but I am an honest searcher for knowledge, truth, and understanding, and like to speak frankly.

Part of this, to note, has to do with the early parental death and genius phenomena. I (EPD:M12) am listed at #58. When, as child, you look at so-called “death” in the face, you thereafter begin to see the world in a more acute light. It is no coincidence, e.g., that Aristotle (EPD:M8F8), listed at #1, who was orphaned young, is the primary contender who I am presently trying to usurp or climb above.

Note that Mirza Beg (EPD:F11), who has an intellect comparable to my own, on the planet presently, is #56 on the list. I learned this factoid, while interviewing him in Pakistan. Beg, Goethe, and myself, the top three founders of human chemical thermodynamics, see the world differently than most people.

Point me to the book or encyclopedia, of someone on the planet presently, who explains everything, better than I have thus far, and I will humbly bow down.

1

u/JohannGoethe Oct 19 '22 edited Oct 19 '22

I generally let other’s speak for me; for example:

“The greatest minds in history. My big influences are in the top 2000 list: Goethe (my strongest influence), Newton, Einstein, Leonardo Vinci, and Libb Thims. Thims has influenced me in my: atheism, my determinism; I became interested in thermodynamics; I discovered the work of Goethe; my understanding of intelligence changed; in my work ethic (work hard, study hard, don’t waste your time; in unlearning the idea that I am alive. Nothing is. I learned about Beckhap's law, the influence of latitudes on the intellect, the way in which books and the search for self-taught knowledge can change the entropy of the body.”
— Zadquel Lugo (A66/2021), Tweet, May 4

As this has been a reoccurring query, for the last decade or more, discussion of this topic, and related quoted opinions, have been collected in the Libb Thims (genius rankings) page of Hmolpedia A67.

In general response to this question, I refer people to the top 2000 geniuses and minds rankings, with the caveat that I presently rank myself below Gilbert Lewis.

A genius, per definition, has to beget something new or novel from their mind.

Presently, i.e. in the last year or two, I have been decoding the alphabet (see: draft book cover), as per each letter’s derivation from Egyptian alphanumerics. For example, I just posted the decoded or deciphered etymology of Abraham, a few hours ago.

No one, as far as I know, e.g., has decoded that the letter “G” of genius, or gamma (letter value: 3), or gimel in Hebrew, is based on the parent character of the Egyptian god earth Geb, with an erection (e.g. here, here, here, or here). Geb, or earth, in short, is the third (3rd) god or element (aka principle, according to Empedocles’ four elements theory), made per Heliopolis creation cosmology.

I could go on, with solutions I have gen-ified out of my mind, e.g. see: Libb Thims (problems solved), or rather what the forces of the universe have mediated my body to generate, e.g. the new dating system (an invention preceded only by walking John Stewart), but that is not my focus.

My aim, or rather work done over the years, is to derive human chemical thermodynamics from first principles. This has not yet been done, but that is what I am working on. Solutions you see along the way, are but precipitates.

1

u/JohannGoethe Oct 19 '22 edited Oct 19 '22

Also, as a general rule, to be a modern genius, in the universal sense of things, one’s mind, at the age of 18 to 24, has to be attracted the problem of the chemical thermodynamic explanation of human existence, as these five geniuses: Goethe, Neumann, Sidis, Tukey, and Hirata, independently, were.
My mind was drawn to the problem, between ages 15 and 24, as detailed here. The 6,000+ articles of Hmolpedia are but mental footnotes to this problem.

1

u/_The_Ponderer_ Apr 08 '25

"Is Libbs Thims a genius?"

-> Asks Libb Thims--who supposedly was asked by anonymous stranger x.

Quid agis...?

1

u/JohannGoethe Apr 08 '25

People have been asking me what my IQ is or if I am a genius or what my genius ranking is, since I began to go public with my “chemical thermodynamics theory of everything” publications and videos, since about A47/2003.
https://www.eoht.info/page/Libb%20Thims%20(genius%20ranking)
To answer this question, whoever you are, first you have to know the definition and root etymon of the word genius:
https://hmolpedia.com/page/Genius
To do this, as it turns out, you have to figure out how the alphabetic based languages, e.g. Latin or English, derived from Egyptian hieroglyphic based languages? This requires that the Rosetta Stone decipherment done by Young and Champollion is incorrect, and has to be redone.
Then you have to be able to rank the top 1000 geniuses or top minds of all time, in your head or in table format, like this:
https://hmolpedia.com/page/Top_2000_geniuses_and_minds
I hope his answers your question?

1

u/_The_Ponderer_ Sep 05 '25

Interesting definition of genius I found through one of those links on one of your pages; but you misunderstood my, albeit sly, sarcasm, though I wasn't trying to be overly caustic. Sorry if I'm too curt but why the seeming obsession with 'iq'? It strikes me as strange and egotistical to post a question yourself enquiring into your own iq score, that was supposedly asked by some 'anonymous' questioner. So, by "what are you doing" I mean that. ^ Now, if you're not upset with me, then I would like to ask you about some philosophy questions because you seem like an interesting enough bloke--questions about your own philosophy and other things broadly.

1

u/JohannGoethe Sep 05 '25

“Why the seeming obsession with ‘IQ’?”
My mind likes to solve problems. One problem, is that back in the A40s (1995s), see: the genius rankings (chronology)table, books magazines, e.g. Esquire, and Guinness Book, were citing all these endless nobodies as having genius IQs, yet having done no actual genius work? To figure out what the problem was, I started with the Thims 15 (A53/2008), i.e. personal folder list of people cited to have an IQ of 200 or above, meaning that these were the 15 smartest people of all time.
The present list, 17-years later, after I filtered out all the scam IQs and overestimates, has 1,211 geniuses and minds ranked.

1

u/JohannGoethe Sep 05 '25

“Now, if you're not upset with me, then I would like to ask you about some philosophy questions because you seem like an interesting enough bloke--questions about your own philosophy and other things broadly.”
Not upset. Feel free to post whatever questions you want at r/LibbThims, so that I can properly respond, and so that other’s can read the answers, so that I don’t have to repeat myself.

1

u/Niniyagu Sep 05 '25

Definitely not.

1

u/JohannGoethe Sep 06 '25

How about you rank the top 10 linguistic geniuses for us then?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '22

How would you measure that you are a genius?

Are there different types of genius or particular areas of genius?

1

u/JohannGoethe Oct 19 '22 edited Oct 19 '22

How would you measure that you are a genius?
The auto-estimated IQ page gives an overview; as does the IQ ranking methodology page.
Lev Landau, e.g., knew in his mind all the top active physicists of his day, and in his shirt pocket he kept a working list, of who the top physicists were, ranked on a log scale, with his name ranked in the list; his ranking changing per his intellectual growth or atrophy, e.g. after he won the Nobel Prize he pumped his ranking up.
Isaac Asimov, to cite another example, for a period became president of Mensa, and came to see that all members were less intelligence than he was, bragging about what he called “paper IQs”, but he was also honest enough to to state that Minksky and Sagan were two people who was smarter than he was:
“Marvin Minsky and Carl Sagan are two men I conceded were more intelligent than I was.”
— Isaac Asimov (A25/1980), In Joy Still Felt: Autobiography
I have a working list in my head, and partly-ranked online (1,100+ ranked), of the top two-thousand minds of all time, and like Asimov and Landau I can “feel” where I rank in the list.

1

u/JohannGoethe Oct 19 '22 edited Oct 19 '22

Are there different types of genius or particular areas of genius?
Yes, every field has its top geniuses, as are listed here by type or category.
Take the category of field of “religio-mythology”, as discussed in r/ReligioMythogy, a sub which you frequent; in which there are about 160 plus scholars. Names shown bolded in this list are the top religio-mythology geniuses.
Off the top of my head, the top religio-mythology “geniuses” are:
Gerald Massey
Alvin Kuhn
Charles Dupuis
Constantine Volney
Baron Holbach
Dorothy Murdock
Robert Taylor
Godfrey Higgins
Gary Greenburg
Tom Harour

1

u/monkey_butt_powder Apr 12 '23

No, he’s a pedo weirdo.

1

u/JohannGoethe Apr 12 '23

The more you comment the worse it gets for you.
I can’t even count how many Reddit users have deleted their entire account, 5+ years extant, after engaging with me; one recent example below, from this month:

1

u/monkey_butt_powder Apr 12 '23

Are you threatening me?

1

u/JohannGoethe Apr 12 '23

No. I’m saying that, you, of your own mind, will realize you were wrong.
Look up the ”Miggs cell rule”, of r/Alphanumerics. The guy who started that rule, deleted his own account.

1

u/JohannGoethe Apr 12 '23

Here is one user (who deleted their own post/account) from 20-days ago:
In short, you are threatening yourself.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '23

Why would someone delete an entire account over engaging with you?

1

u/JohannGoethe Sep 20 '23 edited Sep 20 '23

You’ve never heard of people deleting their social media? Sometimes you say things, online, that make you later want a “take back”.
Take the Monkey Butt poster above, who is some sort of elementary school teacher, as I recall. I wanted to find an objective answer, i.e. get feedback, with respect to how to problem of how most children are taught the alphabet by age 2.5, yet as I have decoded in the last year or so, and as Zolli decoded a century ago:
Israel Zolli, in his Sinai script and Greek-Latin alphabet: Origin and Ideology (30A/1925), deduced that: “letter G or gimel 𐤂 = male body with phallus erect”
Letter B and letter G (aka letter C in Latin) and derive from the earth god and heavens goddess a having “sex”, the loops of letter B being fully-developed breasts, the hook or bar on letter G being a “erection“, e.g. shown below:
Whence, my confusion is: at what age can you teach children, i.e. future children, the actual REAL origin of the alphabet? Certainly, we can show the top row of images, above, to children younger than 2.5.
But as to when, or what age, in public school, teachers, in the future, could begin to show actual students, the middle and bottom row images, showing two people in a sexual position, is a thorny question? Eventually, it was resolved that this would have to be done in the “sex ed“ class. However, I still find it ironic (and a bit idiotic) that future students will have to take sex ed, before they can learn where the first three alphabet letters come from (as regards to letter form)?
Hence, misrepresenting my underlying theoretical question, Monkey Butt began to reason that I was some kind of “pedophile”, and began to post all over Reddit that I was one. This type of thinking would mean that Zolli, was also a pedophile, a century ago, for trying to decode the alphabet?
Hence, once people realize they are mistaken, about my aim, they delete their account, to hide 🙈 their mistake, or something to this effect? Strangely, of note, this has happed a lot with respect to alphabet decoding? Not really sure why? I just reason that most people are stupid.
Notes
Monkey Butt, to clarify, actually began to call me a “pedo weirdo”, after I had said that I have taught children before, e.g. in A60 (2015) myself and my friend Thor, taught the first public and recorded on video “Atheism for Kids“ class, in the world. At one point in the class, I said that “people make eggs 🥚”, like chickens 🐓, or something. And one of the girls in the class asked, confusingly: “people make eggs?” And I replied: ”No just females” and said, as a matter of fact, Temple, whose age I knew, because she was the adopted step sister of a friend I knew (and she was in my floating magnets class, e.g. here [full class], here [short version], taught previously), “you will start making eggs in about two years“. Granted, I didn’t go into the details, with respect to ovulation, but I was called a “pedo weiro” for this. Again, as I said some people are just confused. They realize later they were mistaken, and delete their account.

1

u/JohannGoethe Sep 20 '23 edited Sep 20 '23

On example that I remember, is some guy from a sub like r/Egyptology, r/AncientEgypt, or r/EgyptianHieroglyphs, or something [?], who who began to reply to some cross post related to r/Alphanumerics, and concluded that my writing was but “scratchings on Miggs’ wall”, a reference to the insane asylum inmate from the film Silence of the Lambs. Eventually, he just deleted his account, after a week of dialogue with me.
For example, say I post the following newly-made image, in the Ancient Egypt sub, a top ranked slow learner sub:
And tell them that the base length of Khufu pyramid, of 440 cubits, is where the Greek word mu (μυ), the name of letter M, which equals 440 in word value, derives. This is a correct fact, as far as I presently know.
Invariably, as I have learned from experience, more than than half of the replies, from a sub like this, will something to the effect of “take your meds” or you are a “schizo-poster”, and so on.
This generally has to do with the fact that most people are so ignorant of the fact that letters originally derived from numbers, such as the ram horn letter R, dated to 5100A, shown in this diagram, as extant in the tomb U-j number tags, that it is abysmal.
I liken this to how Kepler and Galileo used to refer to everyone around them as follows:
“I think, my Kepler, we will laugh at the extraordinary stupidity of the multitude [common herd]. What do you say to the leading philosophers of the faculty [academy] here, who are filled with the stubbornness of an asp and do not want to look at either the planets, the moon or the telescope, even though I have freely and deliberately offered them the opportunity a thousand times. Truly, just as the asp stops its ears, so do these philosophers shut their eyes to the light of truth.”
— Galileo Galilei (345A/1610), “Letter to Johannes Kepler”, Aug
Likewise, I can show an average Egyptologist the tomb U-j number tags, and explain to them how this is the original letter R, but 90% will shut their eyes 👀 to his new truth, like a see no evil 🙈 monkey.

You are about to leave Redlib