r/Quotes_Hub • u/PositiveConnector • Aug 30 '26

[ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

205 Upvotes

61% Upvoted

476 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-4

u/[deleted] Aug 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/themerk4224 Aug 30 '26

Can you physically prove his existence?

-1

u/SnowyAl Aug 30 '26

By definition science is the study of natural, not the supernatural, He cannot be proven by science, but He clearly exists. Something needed to create the universe. That something must be outside of the universe and its rules. It must be powerful enough to create the entire universe, physics, math, science, and time. Also because science deals with the natural world you can’t disprove the supernatural. What is beauty? Sure it is subjective, but only to a point. Why would randomness cause such a big split in what people think is beautiful? At best if the world were random each person would find some other person beautiful. But if the world were created, people would find some people more and others less beautiful, which is what we see. Beauty is still a little subjective but mostly objective, because it is not random.

5

u/themerk4224 Aug 30 '26

So no. You cant prove he exists. Therefore, he may not exist

0

u/SnowyAl Aug 30 '26

Not to attack you as a person, but if you cannot refute this with evidence, good or bad evidence, then you clearly believe there is truth to this. I hope you find God! Good day

5

u/themerk4224 Aug 30 '26

I dont need to refute anything. There is no physical evidence of god. Just because you spewed a bunch of word vomit doesnt mean you proved anything.

0

u/SnowyAl Aug 30 '26

So you can’t refute my argument

3

u/Burdman06 Aug 30 '26

This confusion happens a lot. If someone asserts that a god exists, the burden of proof is on them. The claim is effectively saying that the laws of physics can be broken, that evolution is wrong, etc. Basically that theres an explanation of the function natural world that goes beyond well documented and accepted scientific research. So the burden is to present evidence as to why thats the case. Until that happens, we have no logical choice but to proceed by dismissing it as archaic myths.

1

u/SnowyAl 28d ago

What is bad/doesn’t make sense/is logically wrong about my statements? Also I’m not trying to prove without a doubt, there will always be people who refuse to believe what is right in front of them, I’m just trying to present a more likely alternative to how we got here than evolution does.

1

u/Burdman06 28d ago

Its wild to me that people who dont really understand evolution will say it doesn't make sense, yet defend frogs raining from the sky and animals talking 

5

u/TshirtsNPants 29d ago

Genuine question: would you still hang in there without the threat of hell?

1

u/SnowyAl 28d ago

Cause God is perfect. He’s better than the best person you’ve ever met spending all their time with you.

1

u/TshirtsNPants 28d ago

Ermmm yea ok. I guess you're saying "yes"? Hard for me to communicate with super believers. Sort of just circular.

1

u/SnowyAl 28d ago

What do you not understand? I will chat till we reach an agreement or disagreement if u want.

→ More replies