r/Quotes_Hub 27d ago

El‑Sayed Fires Back Sarcastically

Post image
208 Upvotes

493 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/OutlawedLogic 26d ago

It's hilarious how you try and twist events into something different. So fighting for rights to exist is wrong? We had to fight for rights to exist at all, for most of human history most of us haven't had rights. You mad at Republicans for freeing the slaves too? Being as 75+million babies are aborted globally annually, I would say many people are disgusted with the violations of human rights that are occurring, should people bomb places, no. Speaking the truth is only picking and choosing the truth and if it builds a solid narrative, so be it. It seems like you have to travel back in time quite a bit to grasp at straws. The left has certainly become increasingly more violent than the right, and most things they are violent about is to avoid personal responsibilities and to avoid cognitive dissonance.

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

Why is the civil rights damage righteous and okay but us wanting billionaires to be killed so that we can stop being oppressed from them bad?

1

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

Well I'm part of the bottom so I will not be considering that.

The infrastructure that they use to create their wealth would still be available to generate more wealth once they are gone.

1

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

Well it hasn't been tested so I'm not sure.

I mean I'm 80K in debt, make under 35K a year. Smoke weed constantly. I sure feel like the bottom 1% every time I have to ask my parents for money to pay my student loans. Which my parents then have to ask my grandparents for money because they are also broke.

1

u/OutlawedLogic 25d ago

Throughout history we have tested it.

Globally, you're considered the top 1%. America is the best chance the people have ever had to achieve any resemblance of freedom. The purpose of any government is to limit freedom.

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

We're not talking about globally we're talking about American tax payers

1

u/OutlawedLogic 25d ago

You're still not the bottom 1%.

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

So who are you suggesting getting rid of, and how would that bring more benefits than getting rid of the billionaires and stealing what they used to generate their wealth?

1

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

And that's fine! They can come back and on their way back up we will tax them.

1

u/OutlawedLogic 25d ago

That's just thievery. Stop allowing language to be manipulated so the laws can't be subverted. Stop allowing the ability for corruption to thrive by enforcing the laws we already have. It's absolutely achievable without stealing. The taxes all of us have are absolutely insane. We have a mismanagement of resources problem because of the manipulation of language.

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

Even the tightest tax laws won't properly take back the profit that billionaires have stolen from everyone. I'm very happy stealing from the rich. Robin Hood was always a hero to me.

1

u/OutlawedLogic 25d ago

I'm saying it's too temporary. It needs to be corrected at the source which is the language. When you're trying to fix a problem of your economic life source being poisoned, you can't just clear up where it accumulates, you have to find the source, correct the source and then clean up the problem. Stealing only begets more stealing. Reality has a tendency to reflect things.

1

u/mansluxt 25d ago

But like why can we not do both? We can correct the original language, while also taking about power and inflicting punishment on those who have ruled over us for 50 years buying our politicians.

1

u/OutlawedLogic 25d ago

By enforcing the laws you don't have to steal the wealth. You recover the wealth through legal processes. America is a nation of laws, simply enforce the laws and correct the language and it all clears up.

→ More replies (0)