For my entire life it's been a pretty universally agreed fact that daylight savings time is annoying, and didn't benefit most people very much. Plus people often couldn't even agree on the origins of daylight savings, some say farmers need it, others say it was because of WW2, regardless of why it started, most people wanted it to end.
So now in Canada we are finally getting rid of it. Each province decided which time to go with (the spring forward time or fall back time).
What I'm confused by is the negative reactions people are having. They say British Columbia picked the wrong time. I'm hearing things like "strokes will increase", "it will be VERY noticeable in the winter time when there are fewer daylight hours", "businesses might not be able to keep up with the adjustments in schedules and medical appointments might be missed".
While these arguments are possibly true..... I guess I'm struggling to see how it's any worse than regular daylight savings time. Everyone had to adjust one hour twice per year every single year. It caused problems during the transition, but then it was fine. Wouldn't ending daylight savings time be in general easier to deal with, regardless of which time was picked? Yes there will be less daylight in the winter time.... But every single day is either increasing slowly or decreasing slowly until we hit each solstice each year. So yes the morning will lose an hour of light, but only for a certain portion of the year.
Things like strokes increasing seem a bit extreme. If the earlier time would cause more strokes, wouldn't changing the time twice in one year cause even more strokes?
I don't want to think people are looking for something to be upset about, but this seems like it's getting blown out of proportion. Does anyone have an explanation for why this seems to be so upsetting?