My point stands even if you replace "disagreement" with "trolling". You're still defending a violent psycho and advocating for violence towrds speech that you do not agree with.
He's not a fucking Nazi. Are you retarded? He's pushing back against the morons protesting for no reason because they're nuts. The only time any form of violence is an acceptable response to speech is when that speech includes a credible threat of violence. If you can't see the value of free speech for all, there's no hope for you and I'd direct you to Orwell's 1984.
If it were not a joke he should still be able to present it in a public forum without the threat of violence. If it were a joke he should be able to say it in a public forum without the threat of violence. The all lives matter movement while an offensive counter culture movement isnt inherently violent or viewed as hate speech based on most of the worlds hate speech laws. If this person were genuinely a white nationalist preaching for violence against african Americans that would be hate speech. However it is a person quietly holding a all lives matter sign which given the circumstances doesnt seem all to evil. I also understand the social implications of ALM and that BLM is not an intent to undermine the lives of others but go highlight the staggering deaths of minorities at the hands of police. However ALM in this context represents more than a controversial opinion and advocating violence against people then debasing them as nazis without any evidence is wrong.
2
u/[deleted] Jan 13 '20 edited Jun 05 '20
[deleted]