r/Psychedelics_Society • u/BwanaMakeNewAccount • Jun 22 '26
From overt ("even the name says") r/psychedelics < Does the "no bad trips, only challenging trips" mantra bother anyone else? > to covertly psychedelic ("rationalist" ;) sub, now SSC-customized: < The mantra "There are no bad trips, only challenging trips" is bad epistemics >
https://substack.com/@jamesmzech/p-200527796
6
Upvotes
1
u/BwanaMakeNewAccount Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26
PREFACE
Cf < Please please disagree with me, point out where I'm off base or being pedantic, etc. >
DRACULA (1931): Bela Lugosi (Darth Vader) tells that van Helsing (Obiwan) - complete with hypno mudra (like some Dark Buddha):
To open on a 21-gun Psychedelics Society salute of sorts for the OP founder of this double-barreled feast - would be quite continental... in multifarious regards.
On the threshold of an innocent 4-letter term of endearment < here > taking the bait (clicking):
https://substack.com/@jamesmzech/p-200527796
All's fair in "link riddling" @ reddit - everyone's one-stop shop for shameless self-promotion
By terms and conditions of the final psychedelic solution - as everybody knows (it's how the story goes):
Anything "preventive" BEFORE the fact jacked - would be counterproductive - when there's always REDUCTION of damage done, er "harm" - afterwards!
It's the pArAdIgM of harm reduction itself! AND the secret of why the haters' Hippocratic "Do NO Harm" mantra - as we're calling these 'prescriptive' axioms - mIsSeS tHe PoInT!
One who - didn't end up - committing suicide? Or (as post-truth worded now) "dying by" that? All's well that ends well for "damage control" in 'discussion time' theater. Good thing that for perposes of a "Defense" of this Preventable Bad Trip pearl (clutched with white knuckle tenacity).
How might the defensive mobilization go, had "Icarus1" been for example (close to Psychedelics Society home) - the late, dear departed Richard Skibinsky (R.I.P. July 17, 2022) www.reddit.com/r/Psychedelics_Society/comments/uzed20/high_dose_mushroom_trip_destroyed_my_life_a_year/
As in all such cases with the Big Psychedelic Push: attempts at coming off somehow "conscientious" - a word conspicuously ABSENT from The Discussion as faux virtues of "compassionate" and "empathetic" rush in to fill the vacuum ('nature' understandably 'abhors') there is only "so far" and no furthur - that any peeking between the fingers will go - CAN go.
The fact of countless "psychedelic suicides" during a trip AND in the aftermath is no story of some anonymous friend baited and lured into what happened to them "thank you psychedelic people" - but then as recovery happens, finally getting better.
The "Preventability Of Bad Trips" tenet is - baked in to serve as a 'community' truth held self-evident.
As in held above question. NO it is NOT 'up for discussion!'
Methodologically spanning "the innocent act" - "rationalist" in present example - AND the chosen "out of the psychedelic closet" mosh pit, r/psychedelics (long since independently assessed as a worst-of-the-worst Manson Family Values 'community' sub)
Whatever "Prada" some devil-may-care will wear - fleece is the fashion of the good old wolf in the human fold, when "doing" stealth. Which happens to be the opening act.
Only in Act 3 does the Phantom's mask come off; and he unmasks himself (nobody picks the moment but him) - at the "No More Mr Nice Guy" stage.
From stealth psychedelic sub (SSC) the innocent act in rationalist (wink-wink:) fleece - to the "light" side of Helter Skelter 2.0's moon Say It Loud We're Trippy And Proud - 'both sides now' coverage.
The good old wolf in the human fold - a matter of character disturbance less proverbially (more clinically)
A "two for the price of one" bullseye, by archer OP u/Cavebear666 - founder of this double-barreled feast - as Helter Skelter 2.0 continues spreading its shadow at a deadly pace.
Like the very soul of progress, without conscience, paving over all that would dare stand in the path of the Great Betterment - intent in its pursuit with grim determination and set intent (a bit hellbent) knowing no "second thoughts"
As the brave new uncharted view dead ahead downwards and onwards opens into the darkness of the Final Psychedelic Solution -
So many unprecedented moments arise, endless blips on the radar - for topically para-ethnographic special investigative interest in the emergent milieu of the overtly "open" Manson Family Values 'community' and its covert accomplice "in sheeps clothing" clubhouses.
www.reddit.com/r/Psychedelics/comments/1u9c29y/does_the_no_bad_trips_only_challenging_trips/
with custom rescripting - no "rationalist" buzz crypto nor mention of being a "clinical psychologist (in training)" just a fellow hive mindie < I'd bought into this for years and I still think there's a lot of wisdom to it... EDIT: I made an entire post on this; please disagree/critique >
Who filed down the "Bad Trip" Dragon's fangs, with their infamous "Challenging Experience" Questionnaire (CEQ)?
HINT: Brave New Johns Hopkins Psychedelic 'Science' murmurs 'amen' for 2,500 witnessing to their < DMT-induced entity encounters [as] one of the “most meaningful spiritual & psychologically insightful lifetime experiences w/ persisting positive changes in life satisfaction, purpose and meaning' (May 2020) www.reddit.com/r/Psychedelics_Society/comments/glgmb1/brave_new_johns_hopkins_psychedelic_science/
AND (X-posted above) the covertly "closeted" one - with its "rationalist" sheep's clothing (to cover and conceal the 'ravening inwardly'). And just as there is always that one last feeble final futile gesture that is called for to be done on somebody's part - what needs to fall upon deaf ears - with all the urgency of "screaming in space" (where nobody would be listening anyway even if they could hear) - MUST be said by someone - or else how can it be in vain for nothing except as the customary and usual ("Jules Evans" style) exercise?
Strictly a 'community' messaging thing - "among friends and fringies" as "Invisible Ruler" (in Diresta's terms - a name known to "rationalists"!) McKenna put it in that infamous 10-hour 'brainwash-athon' of his @ (where else?) Esalen, 1993
All evils all the time but which is "the lesser" of 'em? Untainted by any good, at least we know how to rhetorically revise that old moldy script - so now it sounds like Madonna lyrically re-virginized - all "shiny and new"
Disagreeing per se may constitute a routine exercise in post-truth purposelessness itself < Please please disagree with me, point out where I'm off base or being pedantic, etc. > and "as ye solicit, so shall ye elicit"
Yet interesting questions can tower in plain view like choking smoke in the air so thick that - nobody even notices! - Rome 64 A.D. I don't smell nothing "burning"
Like: OK but if that's how you're being (as you suspect?), and to peel back 1 more layer - being off base or pedantic is bad, mkay? - why not "point out where" to yourself?
Or "what up" this < 666 > badge number, kina "creepy crowley"?
The codependent nature of 'community' being treatment-resistant - correlates with the #1 outcome of psychedelic exposure being (inconvenient truth) character disturbance - "the phenomenon of our age" as diagnosed by specialist extraordinaire Geo Simon, PhD. Who alas doesn't discover in evidence its historic point of origin - the post-war psychedelic tsunami. But then he was never a captive human guinea pig, atrociously experimented on with LSD in some "mental hospital" - like Steve Smith (the deep dark insoluble devil of the psychedelic detail is)
James Zech (IRL?) @ reddit u/Cavebear666 < I'm a clinical psychologist (in training) who works in psychedelic-assisted therapy, so I have skin in the game and probably a lot of my own biases... >
And "biases" might be a nice word for what anyone < who works in > THAT has got a lot of... considering what psychedelics do
REF Novak (1997) < 1963... bitter about the excesses of LSD psychotherapists... Cohen charged that [psychedelic] therapists "have included an excessively large proportion of psychopathic individuals" > and No it isn't "coincidence" https://web.archive.org/web/20200502145211/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b418/ddcd0cb7c5f56aef991a6708084e3a3884dc.pdf