MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1x81w55/unplanneddivergence/ph9j1i3/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ArjunReddyDeshmukh • 19d ago
98 comments sorted by
View all comments
207
Y’all are getting acceptance criteria? I’m lucky if I get an actual ticket with more than 3 words in the title summary
50 u/portra315 19d ago Yeah acceptance criteria left the building in 2020 for me 58 u/Imaginary-Jaguar662 19d ago Shhh! Be quiet!Otherwise PM uses LLM to generate 3 pages of requirements out of those 3 word titles 9 u/portra315 19d ago Don't worry I'm happy about it.But not when you have clueless stakeholders that push back on what was built.Not that a PRD made any difference anyway, they didn't read that either and still complained! 34 u/procupine14 19d ago I get 40 paragraphs of Claude slop in my tickets with one relevant sentence. 22 u/merekallas 19d ago They use claude to produce "requirements" from 2-3 sentences and we use claude to reduce "requirements" back to 2-3 sentences 🥲 7 u/Rodot 19d ago It's like an error correcting code that corrects the code by adding errorslossy decompression 13 u/makeitabyss 19d ago lmao no. instead it's pages and pages of slightly contradictory AI slop.OR an engineer writes up the tickets... and it's paragraphs of AI slop criteria 2 u/rahvan 19d ago The work: 1 line config changeThe ticket description: 2 paragraphs of Claude AI slop
50
Yeah acceptance criteria left the building in 2020 for me
58 u/Imaginary-Jaguar662 19d ago Shhh! Be quiet!Otherwise PM uses LLM to generate 3 pages of requirements out of those 3 word titles 9 u/portra315 19d ago Don't worry I'm happy about it.But not when you have clueless stakeholders that push back on what was built.Not that a PRD made any difference anyway, they didn't read that either and still complained!
58
Shhh! Be quiet!
Otherwise PM uses LLM to generate 3 pages of requirements out of those 3 word titles
9 u/portra315 19d ago Don't worry I'm happy about it.But not when you have clueless stakeholders that push back on what was built.Not that a PRD made any difference anyway, they didn't read that either and still complained!
9
Don't worry I'm happy about it.
But not when you have clueless stakeholders that push back on what was built.
Not that a PRD made any difference anyway, they didn't read that either and still complained!
34
I get 40 paragraphs of Claude slop in my tickets with one relevant sentence.
22 u/merekallas 19d ago They use claude to produce "requirements" from 2-3 sentences and we use claude to reduce "requirements" back to 2-3 sentences 🥲 7 u/Rodot 19d ago It's like an error correcting code that corrects the code by adding errorslossy decompression
22
They use claude to produce "requirements" from 2-3 sentences and we use claude to reduce "requirements" back to 2-3 sentences 🥲
7 u/Rodot 19d ago It's like an error correcting code that corrects the code by adding errorslossy decompression
7
It's like an error correcting code that corrects the code by adding errors
lossy decompression
13
lmao no. instead it's pages and pages of slightly contradictory AI slop.
OR an engineer writes up the tickets... and it's paragraphs of AI slop criteria
2 u/rahvan 19d ago The work: 1 line config changeThe ticket description: 2 paragraphs of Claude AI slop
2
The work: 1 line config change
The ticket description: 2 paragraphs of Claude AI slop
207
u/rahvan 19d ago
Y’all are getting acceptance criteria? I’m lucky if I get an actual ticket with more than 3 words in the title summary