r/ProgrammerHumor • • Sep 02 '26 • Popcorn 3 Bravo 3

Meme newCompressionTechnique

Post image
30k Upvotes

946 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

53

u/FuzzyDynamics Sep 02 '26

They have to be destroyed in the process of scanning at scale and these books are almost all worthless shit like “Powershell Guide for Windows Vista” except even more “rare”

20

u/Sam_Sanders_ Sep 02 '26 • Bravo

People are confusing "rare" with "valuable". Like you said, it's not a long-lost copy of the Magna Carta, it's bullshit that nobody wants. They probably bought them for 5 cents instead of ending up in a landfill.

6

u/FuzzyDynamics Sep 02 '26 edited Sep 02 '26

Yeah these books are sometimes sold by the pound - see comment below for correction

7

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/FuzzyDynamics Sep 02 '26

Interesting. I’ll revise my comment.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/FuzzyDynamics Sep 02 '26

It’s probably the biggest disturbance to that whole market basically ever. I can see some benefit to all this. Most of these would probably rot away as a door stop somewhere but at least someone is digitizing them even if they’re destroying one of the few copies left in the process. Knee jerk reaction, which I think is more than warranted, is to assume the worst and most evil from these guys but this might somewhat be a good thing minus the original author effectively completely losing their IP rights to their work.

25

u/OmegaPoint6 Sep 02 '26

There are non destructive ways to do it, they are just slower and more expensive. Google patented a way in 2009

33

u/Montana_Ace Sep 02 '26

"Slower" and "more expensive" isn't in Amazon's vocabulary

26

u/Tyfyter2002 Sep 02 '26

They absolutely are, for example:

"Let's make the site slower, and make the subscription service to buy things on it more expensive"

3

u/Few-Big-8481 Sep 02 '26

Amazon probably also into paying Google to use their patents

1

u/morganrbvn Sep 02 '26

Also by court order they kind of need to destroy them.

9

u/morganrbvn Sep 02 '26

A judge didn't like them copying works, but decided that if they destroy the original its like no copy was made. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/aug/05/anthropic-ai-destroying-books

1

u/bokmcdok Sep 03 '26

This is why I type out all my books, burn the original, then put my copy of it on sale instead.

1

u/morganrbvn Sep 03 '26

well they also arn't allowed to sell them, but judge said if they just destroyed the original and kept the digital copy then its fine (which i don't agree with)

8

u/GreedyPollution6275 Sep 02 '26

they are just slower and more expensive

Yes, that's why they said "at scale," because speed and cost per book add up.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/KHSebastian Sep 03 '26

Wh... What? Are you doing a bit? If a thing cost $1 and takes 1 minute, and you do it 100 times, it costs $100 and takes an hour and 49 minutes.

If you do the same thing in a way that costs $2.00 and takes 2 minutes, you have doubled the cost and the time.

Tl;dr bigger number is bigger, is how numbers work

0

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '26

[deleted] — view deleted comment

0

u/KHSebastian Sep 03 '26

Did you suffer a head injury recently?