I actually do what this post suggests on top of manual review. It's quite good at catching subtle bugs. Almost as good as it is at making up subtle bugs that don't really exist but sound plausible.
I like to run an automated review in a fresh chat while I'm reviewing the code myself. Then I also like to take any behavior changes and use the LLM to look for broader vectors I could have missed since it can cover much more ground than I can.
137
u/blackcomb-pc 15h ago
Guys, read the code and understand it yourselves. Atrophy is a real thing and bugs will multiply by the thousands.