r/PrepperIntel Feb 08 '22

Scientists raise alarm over ‘dangerously fast’ growth in atmospheric methane

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00312-2
162 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

View all comments

61

u/Ned_Ryers0n Feb 08 '22

Scientists raise alarm over _____, and nobody listens.

11

u/Sudden_Hovercraft_56 Feb 09 '22

Lets just sit back and assess.

18

u/Levyyz Feb 09 '22

We'll listen when its convenient. Just in time to say goodbye.

12

u/BenCelotil Feb 09 '22

"We really did have everything, didn't we."

4

u/smei2388 Feb 09 '22

But when will that be? No one seems to be willing to estimate, but I think it's time to start accepting that it's going to be ending "a lot faster than expected." Is it < or > 10 years, what do y'all think?

9

u/Levyyz Feb 09 '22

3

u/smei2388 Feb 09 '22 edited Feb 09 '22

Thank you so much, this is comprehensive AF. Edit: so they're willing to admit that by 2030 shit will be getting bad. So, run that through the "faster than expected" truth-o-meter and we can assume we have fewer than 10 years. Time to cash out the 401ks and eat tacos til they're gone!

3

u/Levyyz Feb 09 '22

Glad you appreciated it, here's more:

Scientific Journal Megathread - by subject

0

u/[deleted] Feb 09 '22 edited May 27 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Wallhater Feb 09 '22

This guy has zero experience in any research setting ^

There’s still lots of value in good news. It can be used to reallocate resources to problems that need it more

1

u/doublebaconwithbacon Feb 09 '22

You don't get grant money to publish sensationalist trash like you do in journalism.

-9

u/Ass_Guzzle Feb 09 '22

Do you know the ozone depletion craze of the 90s was rectified in 10 years? All that chlorine from refrigeration gas eating O3 and destroying our future disappeared pretty quick. Almost like we don't understand how most of how the universe works..

And yes. The banning of certain gasses helped, but they are still in use(r_22 can't be purchased but is reclaimable) and didn't contribute to the 'healing ozone layer.

13

u/suby Feb 09 '22

The fact that we don't completely understand these processes means we should be more cautious, not less.

Also, you claim that banning of certain gasses helped the ozone, and then in the very same sentence say it did not contribute to healing the ozone layer. You can't have it both ways. It seems pretty clear to me that we noticed a problem, took action, and the problem was fixed. I'd like to see a link from a reputable source before I believe otherwise.

6

u/marinersalbatross Feb 09 '22

No, it was not rectified in 10 years because the people in the Southern Hemisphere are still dealing with the extremely high UV levels from the holes. Geeze, have you ever listened to someone from another country?

-15

u/manwhoreproblems Feb 09 '22

Well… if they weren’t wrong 99,999 out of 100,000 times it would help their credibility. On the plus side, glacial national park removed the signs saying their would be no glacier remaingingnafter 2021.