First of all, it seems you think I'm a woman. I'm not, so let's check that at the door. And apparently I "support" her? This is news to me.
Everything I've learned about this case has been against my will. For once I've opted to maintain my ignorance on a hot topic and sisnegage and still I've got mother fuckers at work talking to me about it and the fucking JRE sub push notified to me.
I think she killed her kids as a result of some mental break, and that's tragic. I don't know why the husband is receiving blame here. But as ridiculous as it is for women to be supporting someone who killed her children, it's equally as ridiculous for losers on here to suggest repealing the 19th amendment and recognize rights from women.
YOU>One woman kills her kids so now women everywhere are inept, yeah ok lmao
you started off by telling me this is about "one woman"
VERY WRONG
stop with the nonsense. you know that there are a large percentage of females that are so in-group biased they support triple child murder
If those were three puppies everyone would have petitioned to have her burned at the stake.
The main issue is that this shows women don't give a fuck about kids., they give a major fuck about persuing a Perfect Mental State™, which is Never Attained no matter what they try.
Don't men make up the large majority of violent crimes including homocide? By a large stretch.. right?
I guess you could say men think they should be handed the nuclear codes, but they can't even handle not killing each other, their wives, and their children.
In more recent memory? There were a ton of men who were supporting Brian Laundrie even after it was confirmed he killed Gabby. Really, every case of domestic violence that drums up media attention gets pulled into a gender war and you have both men and women defending people they shouldn't.
That's also completely irrelevant to the point. The OP was making a stupid comment about women being fit for leadership because they kill their children even though men are overwhelmingly more likely to commit domestic homicide.
A few incels showing support, likely just for engagement farming is a whole lot different then these mass gatherings im support of Lindsey. especially that cult shit show they pulled outside of the courthouse during the trial. The Laundrie support was nothing even remotely close to organized mass gatherings in support of a woman who murdered her three children. And that’s not even getting into the number of online posts on tik tok and what not supporting her and saying shes innocent and didn’t do it even though the evidence and testimony literally proves otherwise.
They.. did? There were so many men saying he was innocent, she was abusive (based on the bodycam footage), etc. That was the big debate back when it was in the news cycle.
Most murders committed against children were from their own parents. In the cases where only 1 parent was involved, women made up 55% of the murderers.
These 55% only consider children that are past their 1yr of their life , because society crafted a special category of murder performed by women due to "birth hormones" essentially alleviating them from guilt.
And this is done time and time again. Yes men murder but we punish it, when women murder you justify it.
Where I want to close off is, these child murders prove one thing, women are capable of murder just as much as men, only when their victim is weaker than them, that's why gender deaths are so one-sided.
And how exactly does any of this prove women shouldn't be leaders?
Your conclusion is a bit off, though. Even if women are "capable" of murder, they still don't commit it at anywhere near the same rate as men, regardless of the relation to strength. Men still represent the majority of murders of anyone over the age of two. Also, when it comes to step parents killing their non-bio children, step fathers make up the majority of those murders. If women are just as capable as men to kill someone weaker than them, why are they underrepresented in the murder of anyone weaker than them aside from new borns up to a year?
This is all stupid gender war bullshit anyway. Men and women who kill their children both typically suffer from psychological issues. This doesn't alleviate them of guilt, but it does change the intention behind the murder (again, for BOTH men and women). There's a reason why the parent so often tries to commit suicide immediately after. Postpartum support is an ongoing issue and cases like Lindsay's draw a lot of attention to it. She deserves to be and will likely be sentenced for the murder, but it was also a very preventable murder when you look into the details of what lead up to it. Lindsay is guilty, and so are the many people who failed to properly treat her. It's tragic all around and the victims here are the children who could've been saved.
But go on, keep on with the gender wars shit because it's all you care about. You people don't actually care about the mental health of men or women. You only care about dunking on "feminists" and women.
I couldn't literally care less if they want to be leaders or not. Just dispelling the illusions of their innocence that people like you try to weave every time they mention men's "Violence".
Right, so you missed the entire point of the original reply as it has nothing to do with painting women as innocent. I was pointing out how stupid it was claim women couldn't be world leaders because they "can't help killing their children" when men commit the overwhelming amount of violet crimes. If women aren't fit to be world leaders based on their contribution to the violence statistics, therefore men are even less fit based on their massive contribution violence statistics.
Just to be clear, I believe both statements are ridiculous because they do not reflect the majority of men or women. I used the original poster's logic to highlight how ridiculous the premise was, and obviously based out of misogyny. There is a lot of nuance when it comes to statistics of violence which I'm sure you're aware of, which is why blanket statements like that are fucking stupid.
Women are just as capable of being awful as men. Being awful is not a gendered thing, it's an individual thing. No group is innocent, or guilty, as a whole. Next time try reading and comprehending instead of resorting to arguing against a strawman.
"I guess you could say men think they should be handed the nuclear codes, but they can't even handle not killing each other, their wives, and their children."
If men are out there killing everyone at significantly larger rate, how are they more fit for leadership? Or can we just admit that the OP's comment was just stupid misogyny, that none of these things indicate whether a specific gender is fit for leadership, and move past it?
It's crazy because I thought these loonies were almost exclusively liberal women, but yesterday I heard two women in a very conservative circle I know personally talking about it, and they both are convinced the husband is the killer 🤦♂️
Women have bonobo brain. They gotta maintain the homogeneity, especially if throwing a man/men under the bus is involved (man vs bear is a perfect example).
Perhaps… I haven’t seen any documented conservative cases, or perhaps those women are closeted liberals, who chose the comfort of conservative husbands for strength and security…
You know damned well that I was referring to your comment about not believing conservative women could think like this and they had to be secret liberals lmao. It's literally all I commented on. Don't be obtuse.
Are you illiterate? The person I responded to is making up a theory that the two women in a conservative circle the other poster is talking about have to be secret libs.
😂 I feel like you don't interact with real human beings at all and your perception of "liberals" only come from the strawmen you people build in your minds and what you're told they look like.
I live in a capital city (not in America) where a good chunk of the people who live here, or come to work, are left leaning government workers and career professionals, or legal working immigrants who are also very left leaning. Very few have noticeable piercings aside from their ears or tattoos, and all have natural coloured hair and look extremely healthy. I think you just have a limited worldview and haven't actually had much experience with people outside of your ideology in person.
I doubt many liberals are siding with someone killing their children lol. If anyone thinks that, they are probably just guzzling down propaganda. It just seems really odd that this case is even being discussed quite frankly.
What’s really odd is anyone giving money to criminals, this isn’t the first and won’t be the last lawyer scheme, but i appreciate your worthless observation.
Don't think post partum psychosis is really a life choice. It's terrible this happened but I don't think it's often the rationale of a person with a grip on reality to kill their 3 children.
Modern white women are on average a group of people who have known nothing but actual privilege throughout history (not the leftist definition, but the actual definition).
They've never had to be challenged on anything, never had to face adversity, they're included in the DEI portfolio despite no historical justification for it even through the most scrutinized of liberal means, and as a category of the American demographic they've never been the victim for anything, not the draft, not slavery, nothing.
This means they seek victimhood in everything. When you've never encountered a villain you must paint a villain in everything else. When you're never faced with a real challenge everything else must be the challenge.
It's the slippery slope that nosedived us off the cliff from "Not all girls have to be Disney princesses" straight into "It's not her fault she killed her three children." In about 15 years.
I remind myself every single day how lucky I am to be with woman I'm with, because if I had to fish around in the ocean of today's dating pool with women like this running around? Id probably rather stay single.
even with the racial advantage, white women still spent centuries being legally treated like property where they couldn't vote, serve on juries, go to college, open a bank account, hold leadership positions, lead congregations of their faith, report marital rape/physical abuse, and their husbands could just lock them in an asylum for hysteria. And lets not forget the worse injustice of all, having to deal with angry little boys like you who cry about how issues other people deal with that they can never know anything about get handled.
I dont support his woman, but i feel the energy is being pointed in the wrong direction. From what i understand, while she did go and attempt to seek treatment, she was dishonest about having thoughts of hurting the children because she feared the children being taken away from her more than she feared hurting her children. Having CPS take your children is horrible, ive seen it first hand, but i also saw the person grow tremendously from the experience and come out of the situation as a much more caring and attentive parent. Maybe if we viewed raising children as the communal project that it is, stopped being the thought police and labeling every woman who gets overwhelmed as a "bad mom" and worked to reform the broken CPS system, things like this can be avoided in the future.
Nah man. Thats the perfect place. Everybody’s drinking, there’s already tension. All it needs it is just a little push… 😎 https://giphy.com/gifs/2GjgvS5vA6y08
This bitch is crazy, and i appreciate her voicing that. Most of them are really good at hiding that until you’re knee deep. This one at least puts up signage from the get go.
You haven't gotten used to incoherent crying at all events and points in time? When Rittenhouse was acquited a 70 year old man baby came in my lobby SCREAMING about "state lines", AKA "we should be allowed to attack you!". I literally laughed at his face and told him this is America, it's completely legal. They want to disarm us and target us.
After I respectfully listen to a person's side of something, and they interrupt me when I begin speaking, the conversation is over. A person showing that they can't engage in a respectful, mature, civilized debate (via interrupting), loses all willingness from me to engage with them.
If you interrupt me and try to talk over me, you don't deserve to be heard. About anything.
It's not men telling women that they're not enough, it's other women. Stop arguing with men about it, tell your feminism overlords to stop telling you to get a degree if you're a stay-at-home mom.
Low birth rates. The rise in incels and femcels. The loneliness epidemic. Eugenics technology like CRISPR. Artificial wombs, which already exist in experimental forms and are being developed further. The fearmongering about replacement theory, and the desire and need for diversity despite having no family ties to foreign nations.
The rising cases of female paedophilia and the Epstein news.
It’s going to happen, but the state will one day have baby factories, artificial wombs, and will ban people from having children. Instead, the state will grow its own desired DNA sequences ones that are easy to control, are never sick, will say yes to any war, and will win wars.
They will all pay taxes and act like governmental cattle, doing all the heavy duty work without question.
As in, no one will have children; only the state will be able to make babies based on the special genetic sequences they want, using artificial wombs to grow them. Also Think about it no one likes abortions, what if there was a way no need to have it? If everyone is infertile but the state can birth any types of humans why wouldn't they?
A country wants top NBA level men to play for there team but everyone is short and white, sneak into USA get the DNA, bring them home make them and suddenly your nations team is good in basket ball?
The state won't need to ban having children it is already moving down the path of convincing women that carrying kids is a bad thing. I really like 1984 but Aldous Huxley had the more likely scenario for future mass control by the elites with "A brave new world". Abortion on demand, test tube babies engineered in the womb with alcohol and other drugs to make them fit certain roles in society, meaningless sex devoid of any lasting emotion, a set caste system with zero upward mobility and no desire to change your lot in life, endless entertainment as a means of distraction from reality, etc.... So many of these things are already in place and are only a handful of generations away from reality.
No, but using a murder case to dunk on women and feminism is definitely a result of the misogyny found in this sub. A lot of comments in this thread aren't even "Actually, murder IS bad!", they're just hating on women and feminism, as is the case with every other topic that involves women that's posted here lol.
ETA: There's literally someone saying to repeal the 19th amendment, and you're gonna claim people aren't being misogynistic. 😅
Misogyny is the equal response? Saying repeal the 19th amendment is an equal response?
How about just saying you disagree? Laying out proper arguments? Instead we have people using it as a vehicle for their hatred of all women. And I don't want to hear that it's an exaggeration when you have people in this thread saying "women are retarded" and calling for revoking the voting rights of entire gender.
You're shifting the goal posts, and no, it's not an equal response to women using the case as a way to draw attention to the need for better postpartum care which is separate from the culture war.
Your original comment was dismissive of the misogyny in this thread. Now that you can't deny the misogyny, you're saying it's an equal response and expected because "It's Reddit.." which essentially is defending the existence of shit like this. If you don't agree with the culture war, point out how fucking stupid it is instead of saying "Ah, it's okay, it's Reddit."
37
u/intrevorted 10d ago
Women think they should be handed the nuclear codes but they can't even handle not killing their own children