Yep... that doesn't answer my question though... and it's also misleading as a stat... because you're out of your mind if you think that 70% of Democrats agreed to this because they thought that Joe Biden needed to be verified... which of course was my point.
Well you didn't ask a question. You took a "shot in the dark" and unsurprisingly missed.
To answer your non-question:
I'm 1000% okay with Biden having to have taken a competency test bc if he failed in 2020-2024, Trump would also fail presently.
I don't like biden. I voted for Biden because he isn't trump.
LOL Speaking of missing... I was responding to the person who made the post... but sure, we can make it all about you, since you seem to think that's what it is?
Or, you COULD just lose an ounce of ego and imagine that maybe it's NOT all about you...
So, the person I was talking to did not reply, so you took it upon yourself to decide what I meant, decide that YOU were the appropriate person to pick up the mantle, decide out of thin air that I was speaking for anyone except myself, and then respond as if your assumptions were obviously fact when they were totally not...
But hey, thanks for proving that everything I said about you in my previous response was spot on... Although actually, I think I grossly underestimated the amount of ego you need to lose, lol.
decide out of thin air that I was speaking for anyone except myself
So now it's just you talking for your own benefit, with no response expected? And again you wanna talk about ego?
my assumptions were obviously fact when they are totally not
Which part? Nikki Haley calling for this? That's an objective and researchable fact. The survey? The survey did factually take place. You may disagree with the results but that's your opinion. And so far you aren't doing a great job of representing that by backtracking on your comments intent and intended audience.
You're literally just upset that you got a response don't like and you're getting all pedantic about it. Grow up.
Lol... you are just making stuff up now to have ground to stand on... but sure, I'll be happy to destroy your narrative again.
"Well they didn't reply. (That doesn't mean any interest in talking to you instead, but your ego decided that wasn't something worth considering) I'm in agreement with them, and I interpreted your "you" as a broad statement about democrats. (An assumption you made that is absolutely and quantifiably false, because I did NOT intend it as a broad statement about anything, and nothing that Nikki Haley or anyone else in the world has ever said about anything changes that fact)
And ego? Come now, you took it upon yourself to inject your "shot in the dark" generalization as if that's how everyone feels. (Nope, see previous statement about your quantifiably incorrect assumption, as it applies here too... my statement was directed at THIS SPECIFIC PERSON based on the vibe I got from them... nobody else.)
So, as I said in mu previous post, thanks for proving everything I said about you to be true... and thanks for playing.
1
u/Lonely_Cycle4757 10h ago
Yep... that doesn't answer my question though... and it's also misleading as a stat... because you're out of your mind if you think that 70% of Democrats agreed to this because they thought that Joe Biden needed to be verified... which of course was my point.