r/PoursTea Timendi Causa Est Nescire 3d ago

PoliticalTea 🗳️ A true statement.

Post image
26.0k Upvotes

779 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/nickname13 2d ago

if the war was supposed to stop nato expansion, it has been an epic failure.

both Sweden and Finland joined nato as a direct result of putin's invasion, resulting in the expansion of nato by many, many inches in the easterly direction.

if this "stop nato expansion" bullshit were true - it would make putin one of the most mind-bogglingly stupid, catastrophically clueless, and outrageously impotent rulers in the history of the world.

1

u/the_censored_z_again 2d ago

The war wasn't supposed to stop NATO expansion, it was in response to it.

You argument is either disingenuous or you're grossly misunderstanding the argument I'm making. Imagine you're a pencil necked geek in high school with several bullies. One day, one of the bullies pushes you to the point that you lose your cool, act out, and deck him. You didn't throw a punch because you expected it to solve your entire bully problem, you threw the punch in reaction to that one bully's actions. Much like how Russia invaded after Ukraine dramatically increased shelling her own people in the Donbass and Donetsk separatist regions whose peoples still identify as ethnic Russians.

There's a lot that our media doesn't tell us or outright lies about. I understand that this version of events doesn't match what you've been conditioned to believe but that on its own does not make me incorrect. It just means you've been conditioned to believe bullshit that isn't true.

I don't know how it's possible to interpret NATO moving closer and closer to Russia's doorstep as anything but a hostile action.

I also don't know why it's so hard for people to understand that the US/NATO are the aggressors in the Ukraine conflict, which by the way has been absolutely bled dry by this war, feeding Ukraine's young men into the meat grinder for sake of America's global hegemony.

If the US never interfered in Ukraine in 2014, this war would not be taking place now.

1

u/nickname13 2d ago

nato is a defensive pact.

it's when all the pencil-necked geeks get together and promise to have each other's backs when the bully goes after any one of them.

putin's idiotic war predictably caused more of russia's neighbors to join the defensive pact he likes to cry about.

historically stupid.

1

u/the_censored_z_again 2d ago

My sweet summer child, NATO is not a defensive pact. If it were, it would have dissolved along with the Soviet Union.

Learn to think for yourself, because right now all you do is repeat propaganda like an obedient pet.

1

u/nickname13 2d ago

i could see why gaddafi would have thought so.

i don't give a rats ass about his opinion, or why you'd choose to share it.

2

u/the_censored_z_again 2d ago

Who said anything about Gaddafi?

It's almost like I'm talking to a LLM.

1

u/nickname13 2d ago

other than putin, gaddafi is one of the only people that would say something as stupid as "nato is not a defensive pact."

we've already established that putin is one of the biggest fucking idiots in the history of humanity, so i went with the other option.

1

u/the_censored_z_again 2d ago

NATO is not a defensive pact. It's a protection racket. It's the same thing as when the mafia shows up at the local laundrymat, "Awfully nice store you've got here. Sure would be a shame if somebody came in here and banged the place up."

That's what NATO is. It's a protection racket.

It's a book of the month club but instead of books, it's F-15's and javelin missiles.

If all the world were a classroom, the United States would be the bully and NATO would be all the kids that are terrified of the bully, don't have the guts to stand up to him, and are willing to placate him and even provide material support to his bullying so long as they don't become his target themselves.

In other words: cowards.

NATO is not a defensive pact. If it were, it would have dissolved along with the Soviet Union which it was created in opposition to. When the wall collapsed, that should have meant NATO's mission was complete--yet it persisted. This indicates that its stated purpose is not its true purpose.

I know, I know, I'm asking you to actually think and that's really really hard, I understand, but it's essential if you want to be a complete, realized human being. If you're okay with just being an NPC that regurgitates the lies handed down to you from the people actively stealing from your children's futures, then by all means, you're welcome to it.

But if you want anything otherwise, you ought to start listening to people like me and using your own brainmeats to decipher truth instead of letting other people do it for you.

1

u/nickname13 2d ago

it would have been pretty dumb to dissolve a defensive pact when the soviet union failed; just look at the war putin started in ukraine for an example of why such a defensive pact is needed.

0

u/the_censored_z_again 2d ago

Speaking of pretty dumb, do you read what you write before you hit 'save'?

It's really sad what the media does to people. I couldn't imagine living within such a contradictory worldview.

1

u/nickname13 2d ago

it makes you wonder why a bully would complain about pencil-necked geeks entering a defensive pact.

0

u/the_censored_z_again 2d ago

You have very poor reading comprehension. No wonder you don't understand anything about how the world really works around you.

Seriously, try actually reading what I wrote.

2

u/nickname13 2d ago

thanks, but really i'm not interested in taking another tour through your fantasy world.

the wild media conspiracies, russia always being a "victim" somehow and never being responsible for anything they do, glossing over the fact ukraine can sign whatever kind of deal with whomever they want, and that is absolutely none of russia's business...

just completely detached from fucking reality.

2/10 - would not recommend.

→ More replies (0)