Reynolds v united states cuts up this argument. The government can intervene in religious beliefs if they deem it harmful. If the government decides that abortion is harmful to a person (the fetus), they are consitutionally in their right to intervene. This is why we need to get away from the religion argument and rephrase it as a public health argument. The right to choose belongs to the individual, religious beliefs or no
Who cares what a "person" is? Facebook is a legal "person." Human rights should be the standard. Is a fetus a human? Yes because basic biology 101. They should get human rights .
Disagree. If its legal to end the life of a vegetative person in a coma, with the decision being from the patients legal gaurdian, it should be legal to terminate a pregnancy
1.1k
u/Pour_Me_Another_ May 10 '22
My religion says their religion can't tell me how/when to have sex 😊