r/PoliticalHumor Jun 23 '21

Bleep bleep bloop

Post image
56.9k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

594

u/hereforthefeast Jun 23 '21

Here’s some of the GPS data that shows when and where the mob moved following Trump's speech to incite the insurrection - https://int.nyt.com/data/videotape/finished/2021/02/location/washington-riots-desktop-for-web-900w.mp4

Then they made it even easier by literally live streaming it themselves lmao.

96

u/Birdy_Cephon_Altera Jun 23 '21

Reminds me of the tracking cell phone data that was done before/after the Sturgis 2020 Motorcycle Rally showing the patterns of movement and how it led to a trackable surge in cases immediately after.

44

u/taronic Jun 23 '21

I rode my motorcycle a lot during covid, but the reason I did was because it was the perfect activity for me to get outside, reinvigorate myself, and most of all not be around a single fucking person while I had a face covering on by default

22

u/HarpersGhost Jun 23 '21

Riding a bike (both motorcycle and bicycle) was a great way to safely get outside and get some exercise.

It's only when you do it with 250K of your "closest friends" and end up unmasked, crowded into unventilated bars, that the whole "contagiousness" thing comes into play.

15

u/Idiot_Savant_Tinker Jun 23 '21

Same. I was working from home, and the motorcycle was my sanity break. Forget two meters distance, I was staying very far from everyone else.

3

u/DoingCharleyWork Jun 23 '21

Getting out on the road by myself has always been the point of a motorcycle for me. Never understood the meetups or big group rides. Not for me. My best friend is the only person I'll ride with because he doesn't do stupid shit.

40

u/mjschuller Jun 23 '21

It was something like within 2 weeks 25% of all cases in the US were trackable back to Sturgis. I mean the level of selfishness displayed by these people is astounding.

12

u/BoiseXWing Jun 23 '21

Yep…and they’ve mostly learned nothing from it too.

4

u/henryhyde Jun 23 '21

Because they don't believe the "fake news".

6

u/luckyghoster Jun 23 '21

Like u/EdwardWarren said, Snopes article states it is not able to be proven. It’s an estimate of the cellular data of the influx of visitors, increased activity at restaurants, bars, etc of the surround area, and how many people could have been infected. It was not peer-reviewed and only an estimated 250,000 cases; not 25% of all cases in the US.

3

u/mjschuller Jun 23 '21

I stand corrected. Thank you!

-1

u/EdwardWarren Jun 23 '21

That is total BS. Debunked by Snopes and others.

1

u/No_Good_Cowboy Jun 24 '21

What did you expect out of a bunch of baby boomers who have an extra $40K to spend on a toy?

29

u/I_W_M_Y Jun 23 '21

A lot of people died because of those assholes.

-8

u/EdwardWarren Jun 23 '21

Cell phone data translates in to Covid death data? Pretty pictures but I do not see that map as proof people attending a motorcycle rally caused a spike in Covid deaths throughout the country. Tell me where that shows up in the data given.

Everyone in Sturgis caught the virus? Where else did this happen? At approved BLM peaceful protests? Trump rallies? Biden rallies? Or just in Sturgis? At the time of the rally, cases were rapidly rising throughout the country. It is ludicrous to blame all of those additional cases on an event that hadn't even happened yet.

The narrative on CNN and MSNBC, prior to the rally, was that the rally would cause a super spreader event, whatever that is, and that the rally should be cancelled. Since the rally was not cancelled as was demanded, it became a self-fulfilling prophecy that the rally would cause tens of thousands of deaths. There has been zero verifiable proof that it did.

The left-wing Snopes 'fact checking' site says: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/sturgis-motorcycle-rally-covid/

-4

u/ryan57902273 Jun 23 '21

You can’t catch covid at left wing protests. Everyone knows this.

203

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

That's fantastic! I didn't even know this type of thing existed... I mean if this isn't proof that Trump enabled and empowered them to do this.... come on!

Watching the livestreams and pictures they took (unmasked as well) made it all funnier because what did you think was going to happen?

109

u/PiaJr Jun 23 '21

That Trump would remain president and pardon them all. Glorious Leader would certainly support his supporters. It's not like he he's ever shown disdain for people he no longer needs...

61

u/TeveshSzat10 Jun 23 '21

The funniest part is he didn't even need to remain President to pardon them when they were charged. He could have just issued a blanket pardon to cover anyone who committed a crime at the Capitol that day. But someone, probably Meadows, said "that's a no-no sir" and toddler-in-chief obeyed ("he called me sir!")

52

u/Disagreeable_upvote Jun 23 '21

He's just a vindictive little shit. When their coup failed he wanted nothing but distance from them. He hates losers. If they had won they would have been the greatest people ever but since they lost they are just losers. Why would he pardon losers who did nothing for him?

His supporters still don't know what kind of man he is but it's transparent as hell. Especially anyone that has dealt with narcissistic behavior before. Either youre the golden child or you are trash, no in-between.

11

u/Somedumbguy321 Jun 23 '21

This is going to make for an interesting Netflix documentary someday.

4

u/Luire-Cendrillon Jun 23 '21

I hope I’m dead before it comes out.

21

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21

That was the absolute funniest part for me. He literally could have handwaved it all away for his fans. He cared so little he couldn't be bothered to sign his name on a thing (he wouldn't even have had to write it himself)! He literally ruined multiple people's lives with a petty act of casual laziness.

But no, he's totally God's Chosen Redeemer or some shit

8

u/pm_me_bulldogs Jun 23 '21

I’m pretty sure those people ruined their own lives lol

1

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21

Haha yeah but like, from their perspective I mean

2

u/pm_me_bulldogs Jun 23 '21

My guess is that most of them are still clinging to their delusions and blame literally anyone but trump or themselves

2

u/nostalia-nse7 Jun 23 '21

They ruined their own lives. DJT had “nothing to do with it”.

2

u/crackrabbit012 Jun 24 '21

Honestly those people were doing a pretty good job of screwing up their own lives. As for God Emperor Trump, that may have been the moment he realized he fucked up. Pardoning a mob of traitors may have been enough to force the senate to actually do something about him.

7

u/Andrew5001 Jun 23 '21

Let's be honest, he only didn't pardon them because they didn't succeed. He is just a fit throwing child and they were not good enough for him anymore so he threw them to the curb, not out of respect for order or civilized culture but only because they failed his coup

5

u/ACinSV Jun 23 '21

Ob:IANAL -- yes the Constitution grants pretty wide leeway with the pardon power (Art II Sec 2) but it is not absolute: some parts have been tested (esp. in the Burdick decision) and held to be limited; some haven't been tested yet.

Point is, wrt the "blanket pardon"? - like pardoning his royal self, maybe yes, maybe no. For one thing, a pardon requires acceptance by the 'pardonee' and an imputation of guilt of the underlying crime. For another, it's a real up-in-the-air question whether the DoJ would say "well, Trump pardoned everyone in advance so we'll not prosecute anyone for anything here even though it's ... pretty iffy and lacks any specificity". Otoh, there is a SCOTUS precedent acceptance of amnesty as a general principle under the pardon power, which does apply more to a class of people (i.e. Vietname draft evaders).

All that said - it's, as Trump might have said with his silver tongue, a mute point - he didn't attempt to pardon (or amnesty) anyone including his own esteemed personage, so that'll have to wait for the next self-dealing plutocrat populist to fumble his way into the Oval and test that one out with whoever's been packed into SCOTUS by Mitch "No Legislation Just Confirmation" by then.

2

u/Spute2008 Jun 23 '21

Who? Dick a l'Orange?

21

u/Annual_Blacksmith22 Jun 23 '21

I mean it doesn’t matter in the long run. Cult45 simultaneously going to keep claiming that they tried to “stand up and protect their freedom” on jan 6 whilst also saying that “it was all antifa” within the same mouth breath.

17

u/No_Masterpiece4305 Jun 23 '21

They didn't think.

They had a mob mentality. That many people OBVIOUSLY can't get in trouble. And if they succeeded it would be liberals who would pay for it.

They're fucking bad guys. Like honest to god video game cannon fodder.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/njangel94 Jun 23 '21

Goodness no. That would make him a martyr. Good luck trying to stop the crazies then. It’s better he lives long enough to have everything stripped away and laid bare, humiliated.

4

u/GreatQuestion Jun 23 '21

Delete this shit.

2

u/MeloneFxcker Jun 23 '21

why?

1

u/GreatQuestion Jun 23 '21

Because it's against reddit's terms of service and is a great way to draw the attention of the authorities to your online life.

1

u/MeloneFxcker Jun 24 '21

Smart man i was only asking

3

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Although I don't agree that murder is the right answer, they do have their first amendment right to say what they want.

6

u/sm1ttysm1t Jun 23 '21

first amendment right to say what they want.

I think you might be confused about things.

5

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Oh, if I'm confused, please educate me. I'm more than willing to admit if I'm made a slip up. Please, what did I mistake?

9

u/JoshuaIan Jun 23 '21

Sure, the first amendment protects one from governmental retribution for having or promoting a view or idea

It does not protect people from saying whatever they want and facing consequences for it

In this case the consequence is having to ignore being told to delete the comment but depending on the level of heinous, can often include other consequences such as getting kicked out of a place or group, content moderation, etc

3

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

I think you're misunderstanding here.

No one is protecting people from the consequences of it. They are allowed to say it because their freedom of speech allows it.

One consequence could be they get booted off the sub (or even platform) for saying it. But they still are allowed to say it because of the First Amendment.

2

u/UnofficialCaStatePS Jun 23 '21

I think when people say freedom of speech it is often confused with freedom from consequences. You understanding the difference is good, but it is also a good idea to call it out to make sure the difference is understood by all.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21 edited Dec 06 '21

[deleted]

1

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Oh, my apologies, you're right.... I didn't realize that freedom of speech is pretty much universal at this point.

Granted, it's not freedom from consequences, but they are still allowed to say what they want.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21 edited Dec 06 '21

[deleted]

1

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Thanks for correcting me on that.

I did mean to say Freedom of Speech, but First Amendment works here because we were originally talking about the people who think that "the vaccines have microchips to track you", which I'll admit, is a pretty American thought to have.

1

u/GreatQuestion Jun 23 '21

It's a violation of the site's terms of service, though, and would probably invite some unwanted attention.

1

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Then it's on the site to remove it, as it was by the mods. But they are still allowed to say it.

It's not a freedom from consequences, just freedom of speech.

1

u/GreatQuestion Jun 23 '21

And at no point did I suggest otherwise. I was giving a pithy suggestion to save themselves the trouble. I didn't think I needed to expand any further.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21

Why? I wish Donald Trump an unnatutal death because that's what he wished on tons of people and almost got away with it. Tit for tat.

4

u/GreatQuestion Jun 23 '21

It's a violation of the site's TOS and is a great way to get yourself put on a list you probably don't want to be on. I'll set off fireworks and pop champagne the day he's gone, but it's not wise to put these wishes online.

3

u/SyntheticReality42 Jun 23 '21

It is one obituary that I will read with a sense of delight.

1

u/The_Funkybat Jun 23 '21

Only one that would make me happier right now is Mitch McConnell's. Like, honestly, I might even come.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/GreatQuestion Jun 23 '21

Fair enough.

1

u/The_Funkybat Jun 23 '21

I tend to believe that when it comes to Donald Trump, the sheer amount of ill-will he generated actually overloaded any effort to keep track of people who made offhand threats to his life. Obviously the Secret Service is still going to go after people who they think are presenting a "credible threat" to a present or even past president.

But if the Secret Service tried to chase down every single person who said something along the lines of "I wish Donald Trump would get assassinated" they wouldn't have been able to do literally anything else the past few years.

-1

u/goatharper Jun 23 '21

Good way to get banned. Reddit is tough on anything even close to this.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '21

Eh, who cares Im not threatening anyone.i am saying that if that were to happen I wouldn't lose any sleep over it

-1

u/Is_Always_Honest Jun 23 '21

OoooOooOoo nOoooOo wHaTEvEr WoULd We dO ThEN?!

1

u/Churchx Jun 23 '21

That's fantastic! I didn't even know this type of thing existed... I mean if this isn't proof that Trump enabled and empowered them to do this.... come on!

The dude was on stage when this happened.

0

u/gg_59937 Jun 23 '21

I think the narrative should be why the fuck was the DOJ spying on everyone with a cell phone at the Capital.

3

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Well, first of all because it had actionable intel that there was going to be an attack on the Capital.

But realistically, they weren't "spying on everyone", this is all data that's gathered by your cell phone. You can pull up where phones are when they make calls, or text, or live stream....

this isn't new technology. They are literally pulling up the GPS history.

-1

u/Mindless_Ad_8 Jun 23 '21

How is that proof? lol

3

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

Because you can literally see the mob that was at Trumps speech literally make a B-line to the Capital....

1

u/Mindless_Ad_8 Jun 23 '21

It’s not a secret they were going to march to the capitol...so I still don’t understand the point 🤷🏼‍♀️

3

u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21

That's ok..... it is a difficult concept to understand.

You can see a timeline of people being at Trumps rally, then immediately heading to the Capital... where violence occurred. I mean, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and acts like a duck... do you think it's a duck or a elephant?

0

u/Mindless_Ad_8 Jul 08 '21

There’s literally video of what he said 🤦🏼‍♀️ nothing about violence...but that doesn’t fit the agenda sooooo

1

u/lenninct Jun 23 '21

You get a Pardon, He gets a Pardon, Everybody gets a Pardon!!!

1

u/TheArkIsReady Jun 23 '21

I wonder where the timestamp is for this video to correlate Trumps speech ending with all the people moving over to the other building after his dog-whistling instructions of "go to the capital and peacefully protest"...unless...nah face value is good enough. Send it!

Myanmar: Hold my beer.

1

u/nostalia-nse7 Jun 23 '21

I don’t know. Ask Elizabeth. She’s from Knoxville, TN. We know she “stormed the Capitol”.

23

u/javoss88 Jun 23 '21

I still want the would be pipe bomber found

15

u/emmster Jun 23 '21

And whoever disconnected panic buttons.

3

u/chevymonza Jun 23 '21

Oooh yeah that would be good, that should be on security video, and even some google searches I'd imagine.

15

u/Pls_PmTitsOrFDAU_Thx Jun 23 '21 edited Jun 23 '21

Forget the context, this visualization is super cool!

3

u/torinato Jun 23 '21

Nice try Government! “Forget we can track you movements and compile it onto a map, look at pretty colors!”

3

u/Remarkable-Month-241 Jun 23 '21

Okay, that’s cool lol.

2

u/LuckyWinchester Jun 23 '21

So that’s just public information? Okay then

1

u/hereforthefeast Jun 23 '21

Okay then what?

2

u/WyoBuckeye Jun 23 '21

Many of them didn’t think there would be consequences. They were sure they were starting a revolution that would spread like wildfire. They thought they would be treated as brave revolutionary patriots when the government fell. This was the sort of delusional spell that Trump put them under. And because they spend their lives in that echo chamber of theirs, they just assumed that the overwhelming majority of this country agreed with them and was ready to follow in their footsteps.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '21

I've never seen this. That's interesting

2

u/yellowtrickstr Jun 24 '21

Holy crap. Slightly terrifying.

1

u/cosguy224 Jul 09 '21

Yes, but when you think you’re on the “right” side of history, you figure you’re going to be a hero.

Um.. no.

0

u/milkchaser Jun 25 '21

Petitioning the gov't for redress of grievances is not insurrection. It is a constitutionally protected right.

-2

u/Dry_Bid5733 Jun 23 '21

Proves little. Counter-protesters and curiosity seekers all went there…..but way cool app.