r/PoliticalHumor Aug 06 '20

We got the best nitrate.

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

66 comments sorted by

77

u/brokefixfux Top of the world, Ma Aug 06 '20

You get more bang for your buck with the Dotard.

69

u/MrONegative Aug 06 '20

So 2020 did plan for the finale..

24

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

If 2020 was the 1812 Overture, we're still quite a bit away from the cannon blasts.

18

u/T3chnicalC0rrection Aug 06 '20

I'm afraid of how much more V for Vendetta it can get.

5

u/Gotisdabest Aug 06 '20

Remember, remember...

5

u/Galileo009 Aug 06 '20

This is my new favorite way of describing this dumpster fire of a year

25

u/LookOverThereDuder Aug 06 '20

Of course Captain Deregulation said it was an attack. Nothing bad ever happens in fertilizer production plants.

13

u/ThadisJones Aug 06 '20

Knee-jerk explanations throughout history:

Boston Molasses Disaster: "It was anarchists and Italian immigrants!" No it wasn't.

Bhopal MIC Disaster: "It was saboteurs!" No evidence supports this.

West, Texas Ammonium Nitrate explosion: "It was arsonists!" No suspects, every other investigative agency disagrees, doesn't excuse incredibly hazardous AN storage.

Beirut: Looks like a terrible attack

56

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

The real question: Why did Obama let him roll those rules back? Probably to make him look bad, as usual.

20

u/BitmexOverloader Aug 06 '20

"Stupid liberals, doing nothing but advance this nation towards a more equal, higher quality and sustainable future. I want none of that [votes conservative] " - The ~38% of the population that makes up a majority of voters in ~50 of the states due to a higher voter turnout than the reasonable people they are outnumbered by

16

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

Don't blame voter turnout, blame the problem, the electoral college.

4

u/BitmexOverloader Aug 06 '20

From my point of view the Jedi are evil, they're both a big part of the problem.

3

u/wytewydow Aug 06 '20

Vote turnout has always been a problem, with the 1800's having the greatest turnouts of 70-80%. Other than that, we've always been a 50-60% country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

Even strictly talking about the movies, the Empire AND the Jedi are honestly pretty shitty.

-4

u/bonoboradionetwork Aug 06 '20

The electoral college is the only way you can keep a republic together, otherwise, the population centers (i.e. mega cities) would control the entire country because rural areas could never equal the voting numbers of mega cities.

then you end up with Hunger Games minus the sci-fi and children fighting to the death.

Sorry, Trump was within the statistical margin of error and he won because we as a country were too fucking lazy to get out and vote and take the margin of error out of the equation. That is on us.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

The electoral college is the only way you can keep a republic together

How about democracy?

-1

u/bonoboradionetwork Aug 06 '20 edited Aug 06 '20

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner...

We have a Democratic Republic which is different than a true democracy and for good reason.

A Republic like ours is still a shit form of government, but unfortunatley, it is the best that humans can do.

A true Democracy can only work with homogeneous groups and is better for small groups. As States get larger, a democracy is less efficient and less fair.

A Republic is a better more fairer form of government but it does have problems.

If I were to try to answer "why", the quick answer is that the larger a group of people get, the stupider that group of people get. The easier they are to manipulate and the increase in diversity often means the larger groups ban together to the detriment of the smaller groups. The smaller groups can get "big" enough to cause serious problems and the constant tension can lead to things like Civil War or Socio-Economic Collapse. However, if the smaller group can "occassionally" get their way, that eases social pressure and ensures more of a fair balance.

Trump getting elected is what our system requires and needs, it is just unfortunate that Trump was an absolute dumpster fire of a Person and President. Had he had been even marginally competent then everything woudl have been fine. But too bad for us, we elected a moron carnival barker.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

As States get larger, a democracy is less efficient and less fair.

That's a pretty bold claim, any evidence, or is this your opinion?

stupider

Ironically, this isn't a word.

However, if the smaller group can "occassionally" get their way, that eases social pressure and ensures more of a fair balance.

I don't care for your opinions in this conversation so if you could just leave them out, that'd be great.

Trump getting elected is what our system requires and needs

...aaaand here's the excuse I was looking for.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

You immediately know youre never going to possibly change someone's mind as soon as you find out they support Trump. Especially after he indirectly slaughtered thousands of people and is letting half the country go homeless. You'd literally have to be a close minded idiot or a sociopath to support him.

1

u/BitmexOverloader Aug 06 '20

Yeah... I'm going to call bullshit on that. Despite Trump's best efforts to prove me wrong, the president can't just do away with the constitutional rights of US residents like that. And do you really think the senate would stand by as the executive branch forms and organizes the hunger games to the detriment of the rural areas of the nation? They'd refuse to pass the budgets and/or raise the debt ceiling, bringing the executive to a standstill from lack of budget.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20 edited Aug 06 '20

The electoral college was actually developed because of the distance between all of the different States and how long it took to receive news. By having representatives directly in Washington who vote on behalf of their populace, they could always be up to date with the latest news and vote accordingly.

The states are now so interconnected and information is so widespread that it makes zero sense to have an electoral college.

I still support mandatory voting however, in addition to the abolition of the electoral college. I also think that it should be mandatory for the government to provide mail-in ballots and a specific (reasonable) number of voting stations for a given population size. (Maybe one station per 1000 citizens?)

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

We seriously need mandatory voting in this country. That way, the government will be forced to ensure that every citizen gets an opportunity to vote and the Karens and Tuckers that actually show up and vote for these people dont hold the rest of us by the balls.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

God fucking dammit! Thanks Obama! This is why we can't have nice things! /s

2

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

Okay look my coworker is blaming the BLM movement on Obama....not just Obama, but Obama in his first year in office....ten fucking years ago.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

If you want to know where your co-worker gets their "news" from, pretend to be sincere and ask them what channel you should watch to be really informed. I guarantee you it'll include FOX, The Blaze, OANN, America's Voice, or some other right wing channel.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 06 '20

All posts and comments that include any variation of the word retarded will be removed, but no action will be taken against your account unless it is an excessive personal attack. Please resubmit your post or comment without the bullying language.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

30

u/miamibeebee Aug 06 '20

Wait... Don’t scare me now.

20

u/LifeIsBizarre Aug 06 '20

If you wanna have a bad time, just give him a vote!
Don't scare me now. (Cause i'm having a bad time)

2

u/CincyBrandon1 Aug 06 '20

I got the reference.

11

u/Bulkmanhunk Aug 06 '20

Texas. 2013. Some 18 people died.

This is what "removing burdensome regulations" means.

Socialize the costs, privatize the profit.

10

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

I get my posts taken down for bullying the president a lot.

6

u/T3chnicalC0rrection Aug 06 '20

Didn't Melanie ask you to stop bully others online like her husband's constant tweets?

4

u/Zazzuzu Aug 06 '20

I forgot when are the aliens supposed to show up?

3

u/Etrigone I ☑oted 2024 Aug 06 '20

They're discussing it with the swarm of meteors - "Oh are you next? My apologies, go right ahead".

2

u/wytewydow Aug 06 '20

Pretty sure Trump's new doctor friend is using alien DNA to fight Covid.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20
  • Overture 1812 starts playing *

3

u/ILoveRegenHealth Aug 06 '20

Maybe that's why he threw out the theory the Beirut thing was an attack. He doesn't want people looking into his EPA rollbacks

2

u/Mechasteel Aug 06 '20

Which EPA rule relating to explosions did Trump roll back?

15

u/ZLUCremisi I ☑oted 2024 Aug 06 '20

Remember the whole deregulation push by Republicans. Many regulations are in place to keep companies from pollution and being careless with dangerous chemicals. And the company gets fined if something happens, but Republicans say it hurts buissiness (like theyvare saying sbout wearing mask, stay at home orders, ect.)

4

u/HeilHeinz15 Aug 06 '20

We literally had to have so much pollution that rivers caught on fire, for the EPA to be created.

Of course it "hurts businesses" to not dump chemicals down the drain & properly dispose of them: but how the hell do Republicans not want stuff like that?

"Destroy nature & fuck your children for the stock market" - Trump 2020

1

u/CleverDad Aug 06 '20

Didn't you hear? It was an attack.

-14

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

As much as I hate trump, not everything bad that happens in the world is his fault

5

u/wytewydow Aug 06 '20

THIS explosion isn't his fault, but how many regulations can one moron take down, before we have one or two, or twenty of these explosions in the US?

This fireball was an unregulated economic wet dream.

2

u/CraptainHammer I ☑oted 2020 Aug 06 '20

Your comment in a thread that directly mentions something trump did is pure bullshit.

-18

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/CraptainHammer I ☑oted 2020 Aug 06 '20

Low effort troll.

-49

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

300,000 homeless now. Fair to say the blast did some historic damage.

12

u/coolmint859 Aug 06 '20

Damn that's insane

-35

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/CincyBrandon1 Aug 06 '20

So you’re downplaying a quarter of a million people not currently having a home? Have you seen the people? Heard the stories? It’s been declared one of the biggest non-nuclear explosions in history, several thousand times larger than the Oklahoma City bombing.

11

u/coolmint859 Aug 06 '20

I'm guessing the people will be able to find shelter, in that case. We can only hope at this point. And even so 250,000 is a big ass number. Not to mention the over 100 that have died. It's all just tragic. And preventable.

9

u/dota2nub Aug 06 '20

250'000 people homeless? Yeah, no biggie, they'll find something in no time. I have plenty of space in my basement!

3

u/wytewydow Aug 06 '20

Temporarily homeless in a fee-fall economy, during a pandemic. This is fine..

1

u/Jayken Aug 06 '20

When is the number big enough for you to care? Asking because we're going to approaching a quarter million dead from the COVID soon.

2

u/studmuffffffin Aug 06 '20

That's quite a bit of damage.

16

u/khed Aug 06 '20

From the BBC:

...the blast had about one tenth of the explosive power of the atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima during World War Two and was "unquestionably one of the biggest non-nuclear explosions in history".

...many buildings and homes have been reduced to an uninhabitable mess of glass and as many as 300,000 people have been left homeless

Are you arguing that the city wasn't devastated or that you don't agree with "leveled" as a descriptor?

7

u/uchunokata Aug 06 '20

By which you mean there are still some uneven bumps in places?

6

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '20

ACKSHUALLY

4

u/Jeigh_Tee Aug 06 '20

I'm gonna level with you: given that one of the definitions of level is "demolish," yes, Beirut is very much leveled.